Question of the Week
Does "New Source Review" Apply to My Facility?
Q. My company is planning to install some new equipment on our production line that will increase the amount of carbon monoxide we release. We are trying to figure out if we need to go through New Source Review (NSR) under the Clean Air Act. Which pollutants are regulated under that rule? Do we need to follow the NSR requirements before we install the new equipment?
A. The NSR rules [40 CFR 50-52] under the Clean Air Act are among the most complex of EPA's regulations. Whether you're subject to them is dependent on some very specific information, including your location, your operations, and the type and amount of pollutants you release.
You must first determine if your facility is in an attainment or a non-attainment area for carbon monoxide. If you don't know the answer, you can look up the status at 40 CFR 81 or on EPA's air data Web site.
Second, you need to find out if your facility (as it currently operates) is considered a "major stationary source" by EPA. Be cautious in this determination, as the definition of "major stationary source" differs for facilities in attainment areas versus facilities in non-attainment areas. Carbon monoxide is included in the regulatory definition of a "regulated NSR pollutant," as are many additional air pollutants.
If your source is a "major stationary source," you need to calculate how much carbon monoxide your new equipment could potentially release on an annual basis. This amount will determine if you are planning a "major modification" and whether NSR applies to your situation. If it does apply, then you'll be required to obtain a pre-construction permit, install modern pollution control equipment, and possibly fulfill other regulatory obligations.
Finally, consider that other regulations affecting air emissions may be triggered by a modification to your facility, including New Source Performance Standards [40 CFR 60], Title V permitting requirements [40 CFR 70], and possibly state-specific regulations.
Related Rulemaking
Proposed Changes for Electric Generating Units
The EPA has published a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (SNPR) [72 FR 26202] to the October 2, 2005 notice of proposed rulemaking [70 FR 61081] to offer further options for changing the emissions increase test used to determine if the New Source Review (NSR) permitting program would apply when an existing power plant makes a physical or operational change. This proposal would affect only the application of the NSR program to existing electric generating units (EGUs) at power plants. In its October 2005 proposal, EPA proposed an hourly emissions increase test alone, whereby EPA would remove the annual emissions increase test in the current regulations and an EGU would be subject to NSR if the hourly emissions would increase. In this SNPR, EPA is including a new (and preferred) option. Under the new option, the current annual emissions increase test is retained and applied in situations where an EGU’s hourly emissions would increase.
Join the conversation! Visit the environ-mgmt Discussion Group to post comments, ask questions, and get answers!
Getting More Answers
Lion Members gain access to our extensive online databases of helpful compliance advice, regulatory documents, and resources. E-mail your question to our regulatory experts or open your own hotline account. Membership services are free to workshop attendees for one year. Or, purchase or renew your membership online.
Back–to–top
EPA News
05/02/2007Company Fined for Tainted Fuel
Kinder Morgan Transmix Co. has agreed to pay the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency $600,000 to resolve numerous violations of federal air and hazardous waste regulations, including mixing hazardous waste with gasoline. "Illegally adding hazardous waste to gasoline can injure people's health and foul our environment," said Granta Nakayama, assistant administrator for EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. Read more...
05/02/2007New EPA Web Site Makes It Easier To Be Good Environmental Stewards
The new EPA Web site on stewardship programs, launched May 2nd, can help business, government and private citizens make intelligent choices on sustainable environmental benefits. Simple everyday decisions by organizations and individuals on such issues as recycling, reuse or choice of fuel support pollution prevention and environmental stewardship. Read more...
05/01/2007Texas Refinery Will Pay $2.9 Million to Resolve Air Violations: Company Will Take Significant Steps to Reduce Harmful Emissions
Total Petrochemical USA Inc. (Total) will pay a $2.9 million penalty and upgrade pollution controls at its Port Arthur, Texas refinery, to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Air Act, the Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced May 1st. Read more...
04/26/2007Acid Manufacturer Will Spend $50 Million to Reduce Air Pollution
Acid manufacturer Rhodia Inc. will pay a $2 million penalty and spend approximately $50 million on air pollution controls at eight production plants in four states across the country, to resolve allegations that the company violated the Clean Air Act. The pollution controls are expected to reduce harmful emissions from its production plants in Texas, Louisiana, California and Indiana by 19,000 tons per year.
Read more...
View more EPA news
Back–to–top
Recent EPA Rules, Standards, and Interpretations
05/03/2007National Air Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Halogenated Solvent Cleaning
EPA is promulgating revised standards to limit emissions of methylene chloride (MC), trichloroethylene (TCE) and perchloroethylene (PCE) from facilities engaged in halogenated solvent cleaning. Read more...
05/01/2007Prevention of Significant Deterioration, Nonattainment New Source Review, and Title V: Treatment of Certain Ethanol Production Facilities Under the “Major Emitting Facility” Definition
This final rule finalizes proposed changes made to the definition of “major emitting facility” in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR) and Title V regulations. Two of the regulatory changes proposed addressed the major source threshold for PSD sources. The remaining proposed regulatory changes finalized in this action address when fugitive emissions are counted for purposes of determining whether a source is a major source under the PSD, nonattainment NSR or Title V programs. Read more...
05/01/2007Drinking Water: Regulatory Determinations Regarding Contaminants on the Second Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List—Preliminary Determinations
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), requires EPA to make regulatory determinations on at least five unregulated contaminants and decide whether to regulate these contaminants with a national primary drinking water regulation (NPDWR) every five years. This action presents the preliminary regulatory determinations for 11 of the 51 contaminants listed on the second Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 2) and describes the supporting rationale for each. Read more...
View more EPA Actions
Back–to–top
|