Hazardous Waste News

Volume 8, Issue 51

December 20, 2007 

In light of the holiday season we have sent this edition of the newsletter early. Thank you, Lion NewsInfo Links Team

Question of the Week

“No-Smoking” Signs — Large and Small Quantity Generator Requirements

Q. We have two facilities. One is a large quantity generator and one is a small quantity generator. Both facilities generate ignitable and reactive wastes. We know that there is a requirement in the hazardous waste rules to post “no-smoking” signs. Are there different standards for each site? What if the site is already a non-smoking facility?

A. According to the rules at 40 CFR 265.17(a), “The owner or operator must take precautions to prevent accidental ignition or reaction of ignitable or reactive waste. This waste must be separated and protected from sources of ignition or reaction including but not limited to: open flames, smoking, cutting and welding, hot surfaces, frictional heat, sparks (static, electrical, or mechanical), spontaneous ignition (e.g., from heat-producing chemical reactions), and radiant heat. While ignitable or reactive waste is being handled, the owner or operator must confine smoking and open flame to specially designated locations. “No Smoking” signs must be conspicuously placed wherever there is a hazard from ignitable or reactive waste.” (Emphasis added.)

40 CFR 265.17(a) is incorporated by reference into §265.176, which states “containers holding ignitable or reactive waste must be located at least 15 meters (50 feet) from the facility's property line. [Comment: See 262.17(a) for additional requirements.]” Therefore, if you are required to meet §265.176, you are also required to meet §265.17(a).

Large Quantity Generators are required by 262.34(a)(1)(i) to comply “with the applicable requirements of Subparts I, AA, BB and CC of 40 CFR Part 265.” 265.176 (and by reference 265.17(a)) are part of 265 Subpart I. Therefore, you must post “No Smoking” signs conspicuously near any ignitable or reactive waste in your 90-day storage areas at that facility.

Small Quantity Generators are required to comply "with the requirements of Subpart I of Part 265 … except for §265.176 and §265.178." Since Small Quantity Generators are not required to follow §265.176, they are also not required to follow §265.17(a). You do not need to post conspicuous “no smoking” signs near your ignitable or reactive waste in your 180-storage areas at that facility.

The rules do not provide an exclusion from the posting of “No Smoking” sign for sites with a facility-wide smoking ban. The EPA has not addressed this in any formal interpretations either. So, unless your authorized state provides an exception, you are in the most defensible position if you go ahead and post “No Smoking” signs.

Because state programs can be more stringent, some states may require even Small Quantity Generators to have those “No Smoking” signs. Check your state regulations to be sure. Remember that OSHA, as well as local health and fire regulations, may require additional safety notices.


 

Join the conversation! Visit the waste Discussion Group to post comments, ask questions, and get answers!

Getting More Answers
Lion Members gain access to our extensive online databases of helpful compliance advice, regulatory documents, and resources. E-mail your question to our regulatory experts or open your own hotline account. Membership services are free to workshop attendees for one year. Or, purchase or renew your membership online.

Back–to–top

RCRA News, Rules, & Interpretations

12/12/2007—U.S. EPA Fines Nevada Developer $43,000 Over Injection Well Violations
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently fined a Nevada-based developer $43,000 for violating its underground injection control permit at the 240-home Pineview Estates subdivision in Gardnerville, Nev., a violation of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act.

Read more...

12/12/2007—National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Polymers and Resins, Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards
This proposed rule requests public comment on the residual risk and technology reviews for eight industrial source categories regulated by four national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (HAP).

Read more...

12/10/2007—EPA Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the semiannual regulatory agenda to update the public about:

  • Regulations and major policies currently under development,
  • Reviews of existing regulations and major policies, and
  • Rules and major policymakings completed or canceled since the last agenda.

Read more...

12/07/2007—Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries
EPA is issuing this Notice of Data Availability (NODA) in support of the proposed rule published on May 14, 2007, entitled Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries. EPA received a number of comments on the proposed rule and is in the process of evaluating those comments. During the review of recently received comments, we determined that data and analyses were inadvertently left out of the docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0011. This NODA notifies the public that we have added data and analyses to the docket and provides an additional comment period for the proposed rule. Comments on all aspects of this proposal are welcome.

Read more...

12/06/2007—EPA Orders Lamb Creek Wetlands to be Restored
Chantell and Michael Sackett, residents near Priest Lake, Idaho have been ordered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to restore damaged wetlands on their property near Lamb Creek, Bonner County, Idaho.

Read more...

12/05/2007—U.S. EPA Settles With Arizona Mine for $28,950 for Toxic Chemical Reporting Violations
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today settled with an Arizona mining company for $28,950 for failing to submit required toxic chemical reports, a violation of the federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act.

Read more...

11/29/2007—Neglected Oil Spill Nets Pocatello Quarry Owner a $9,250 EPA Penalty The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has issued a compliance order to PSC Industrial Outsourcing, Inc. of Houston, Texas, for violating the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The order also requires PSC Industrial Outsourcing, Inc. to fund a $100,000 Small Scale Chemistry environmental project in Lake Charles, Louisiana.

Read more...

View more RCRA news


For Lion Members and Recent Course Attendees: Visit the Lion Online Library to view the most recent RCRA rules and interpretive letters.

Back–to–top

State Hazardous Waste News

California

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control has not issued any recent hazardous waste news.

More California Resources

New York

12/7/2007—DEC Announces Annual Environmental Excellence Awards

DEC named six award winners for the 2007 Environmental Excellence Awards, with the winning projects coming from industry, local governments and an environmental advocacy group.

Read more...

More New York Resources

Texas

12/05/2007—TCEQ Approves Fines Totaling $563,554
Included in the total fine figure is a penalty of $128,043 against Cerrito Gas Processing, L.L.C. in Webb County. The fines are assessed because the company failed to prevent unauthorized air emissions in the spring of 2006. The plant has been shut down since September of 2006.

Read more...

More Texas Resources

For hazardous waste news from your state, visit Lion's State Links page.

Back–to–top

2007–2008 Course Catalog
Upcoming Web Seminars
Managing Used Oil
    Jan. 15, 2008
TSCA: Chemical Reporting & Recordkeeping
    Jan. 17, 2008
Hazardous Materials Air Shipper Certification—IATA
    Jan. 29, 2008
Managing Hazard Communication
    Jan. 30, 2008
Land Disposal Restrictions
    Jan. 31, 2008
Upcoming Workshops

Hazardous/Toxic Waste Management
Jan. 7–8 — Orlando
Jan. 10–11 — Mobile
Jan. 14–15 — Baton Rouge
Jan. 17–18 — Memphis
Jan. 21–22 — Nashville
Jan. 24–25 — Richmond
Jan. 28–29 — Charlotte
Jan. 31–Feb. 1 — Atlanta
Feb. 6–7 — Houston
Feb. 20–21 — Dallas
Feb. 25–26 — San Antonio

Advanced Hazardous Waste Management
Jan. 24–25 — Albany
Jan. 28–29 — Boston
Jan. 31–Feb. 1 — Hartford
Feb. 7–8 — Philadelphia
Feb. 11–12 — Northern NJ
Feb. 14–15 — Baltimore
Mar. 10–11 — Memphis

Hazardous Waste in California
Jan. 7–8 — Los Angeles
Jan. 10–11 — Santa Barbara
Jan. 14–15 — Fresno
Jan. 17–18 — San Francisco

Industrial & Hazardous Waste in Texas
Feb. 8 — Houston
Feb. 22 — Dallas
Feb. 27 — San Antonio

The Complete Environmental Regulations
Jan. 7–8 — Philadelphia
Jan. 10–11 — Northern NJ
Jan. 14–15 — Long Island
Jan. 21–22 — Boston
Jan. 24–25 — Hartford
Feb. 21–22 — Orlando
Feb. 25–26 — Atlanta

Hazardous Materials Transportation Certification
Jan. 7–8 — Boston
Jan. 10–11 — Manchester
Jan. 14–15 — Hartford
Jan. 17–18 — Albany
Jan. 21–22 — Central NJ
Jan. 28–29 — Philadelphia
Feb. 4–5 — Baltimore
Feb. 5–6 — Northern NJ
Feb. 11–12 — Orlando
Feb. 19–20 — Atlanta

Hazardous Materials Air Shipper Certification—IATA
Jan. 9 — Boston
Jan. 16 — Hartford
Jan. 23 — Central NJ
Jan. 30 — Philadelphia
Feb. 6 — Baltimore
Feb. 13 — Orlando
Feb. 21 — Atlanta

Hazardous Materials Vessel Shipper Certification—IMDG
Jan. 10 — Boston
Jan. 17 — Hartford
Jan. 24 — Central NJ
Jan. 31 — Philadelphia
Feb. 7 — Baltimore
Feb. 14 — Orlando
Feb. 22 — Atlanta

Online Training
Generating/Accumulating Hazardous Waste
Generating/Shipping Hazardous Waste