Question of the Week
Do Hearing Protection Requirements Apply to Hearing-Impaired Employees?
Q. We have certain areas in our facility where noise levels exceed OSHA's
TWA (time weighted average) permissible noise exposure levels. I know that employees
working in the area are supposed to be given some sort of "hearing protection," but
what about employees who have suffered a loss of hearing and wear hearing aids? Is it
acceptable to just tell them to turn the hearing aids down or off when they are working in the area?
Would employees who are diagnosed as being deaf need to be provided with hearing protection in
these noisy areas of the facility?
A. Whenever employees are subjected to sound exceeding OSHA's permissible exposure levels,
administrative or engineering controls should be implemented to try to reduce the noise to acceptable
levels. If these controls fail to reduce sound levels to acceptable limits, then personal protective
equipment must be provided and used to reduce sound levels to permissible levels [29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1)].
In addition, employees who are exposed to an eight-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) noise level of
85 dBA or greater and who have experienced a standard threshold shift (defined as a change in hearing
threshold relative to the baseline audiogram of an average of 10 dB or more at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz
in either ear [29 CFR 1910.95(g)(10)(i)] must be provided with, and must use, hearing protectors with
sufficient attenuation to reduce noise levels below 85 dBA [1910.95(i)(1) and (2)]. This standard applies
to all employees; there are no exceptions for employees who have diminished capacity to hear or for employees
who have been diagnosed as deaf.
Employees with a diminished capacity to hear cannot satisfy the requirement to wear hearing protection
simply by turning off their hearing aids when working in a high noise area because hearing aids are not
hearing protectors. Turning the hearing aids off will not protect them from further harmful effects of
excessive noise. The proper course of action would be for them to leave their hearing aids on and wear
ear muffs with sufficient attenuation to reduce all workplace noise below 85 dBA TWA. Since even employees
who have been diagnosed with severe or profound deafness may still hear some noise, they would also need to
be protected from additional loss through the use of hearing protectors.
Join the conversation! Visit the osh-mgmt
Discussion Group to post comments, ask questions, and get answers!
Getting More Answers
Lion Members gain access to our extensive online
databases of helpful compliance advice, regulatory documents,
and resources. E-mail
your question to our regulatory experts or open your own hotline
account. Membership
services are free to workshop attendees for one year. Or,
purchase or renew your membership
online.
Back–to–top
OSHA News
02/28/2007OSHA Fines Two Hollis, N.H., Contractors
$81,800 for Cave-In Hazards at Nashua Worksite
Two Hollis, N.H., contractors face a combined total of $81,800 in fines from the U.S. Department of Labor's
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for alleged cave-in hazards at a Nashua construction site.
Read more...
02/27/2007Dixie's Leominster, Mass. Plant Earns
Prestigious Workplace Safety and Health "Star" from U.S. Labor Department's OSHA
Dixie Consumer Products' Leominster, Mass., manufacturing plant has earned membership in the prestigious "Star"
Voluntary Protection Programs (VPP) of the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA). Read more...
02/22/2007U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA Cites Safety
Violations at Columbus Foam Insulation Manufacturing Plant, Proposing $155,000 in Penalties: Federal Action Follows August 2006 Fatality
The U.S. Labor Department's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has proposed $155,000 in fines
against Insulfoam-Columbus in Columbus, Ohio, for alleged repeat, willful and serious violations of federal workplace
safety standards following the death of an employee in August 2006. Read
more...
02/22/2007U.S. Labor Department's OSHA Cites Arapahoe Utilities & Infrastructure in Englewood for Alleged Safety Violations
The U.S. Labor Department's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has cited Arapahoe Utilities & Infrastructure
Inc., Englewood, Colo., for unsafe working conditions following two accidents where employees were working in excavations
at two construction sites in Denver. Proposed penalties total $145,000.
Read more...
02/22/2007U.S. Department of Labor’s OSHA Forms
Safety Partnership with Legacy Building Group and Clayco during Expansion of Casino Queen: Reducing Injuries and
Illnesses is Top Priority During $60-Million Construction Project
The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has agreed to
form a safety partnership with Legacy Building Group and Clayco, a joint venture, and their
subcontractors with the goal of reducing accidents, injuries and illnesses during the $60 million expansion
project of the Casino Queen.
Read more...
View
more OSHA news
Back–to–top
CSB News
02/28/2007CSB Issues Final
Report on Chlorine Release at DPC Enterprises in Glendale, Arizona: Report Notes
Company's Lack of Engineering Safeguards
In a final report issued February 28th, the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB)
concluded that insufficient safety margins, a lack of engineering safeguards,
unclear procedures and training, and an absence of published guidance were among
the causes of a release of up to 1,920 pounds of chlorine from the DPC Enterprises
facility in Glendale, Arizona, on November 17, 2003. Read more...
02/23/2007CSB Releases New Strategic Plan
for 2007-2012; Heightened Emphasis on Greater Chemical Safety Impact
In a final report issued February 28th, the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB) concluded that
insufficient safety margins, a lack of engineering safeguards, unclear procedures and training,
and an absence of published guidance were among the causes of a release of up to 1,920 pounds of
chlorine from the DPC Enterprises facility in Glendale, Arizona, on November 17, 2003.
Read more...
View
more CSB news
Back–to–top
Recent OSHA Rules and Standards
For Lion Members
and Recent Course Attendees
02/14/2007Electrical Standard
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is revising the general
industry electrical installation standard found in Subpart S of 29 CFR Part 1910. The
Agency has determined that electrical hazards in the workplace pose a significant risk
of injury or death to employees, and that the requirements in the revised standard are
reasonably necessary to provide protection from these hazards. This final rule focuses
on safety in the design and installation of electric equipment in the workplace.
Read more...
View
more OSHA actions
Back–to–top
Recent OSHA Interpretations
To view the most recent OSHA interpretive letters visit the Lion
Online Library.
Back–to–top
|