Search

Update: 2018 TSCA Mercury Reporting Rule Revised

Posted on 11/22/2021 by Roger Marks and Lauren Scott


Update (11/8/21)

On November 8, a revision to EPA's 2018 rule "Reporting Requirements for TSCA Mercury Inventory: Mercury" was published to the Federal Register.

The original rule requires reporting from persons who manufacture (including import) mercury or mercury-added products, or otherwise intentionally use mercury in a manufacturing process. The latest update would mean companies that import pre-assembled products that contain a mercury-added component (such as a watch with a mercury-added battery) would be required to report such imports to EPA.

The original 2018 mercury reporting rule was challenged in the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in July 2018, and the court issued its decision on June 5, 2020, vacating an exemption for companies that import pre-assembled products containing a mercury-added component. In its decision, the court found that the exemption for importers of products containing mercury-added components was an unlawful interpretation of TSCA because it lacked a reasoned explanation.

The new revisions announced implement the court’s order vacating this exemption. This change goes into effect on December 8, 2021.


Original Article Text (7/6/18)

In late June 2018, US EPA finalized a rulemaking to require manufacturers, importers, distributors, and users of mercury and mercury-added products to report to EPA about their activities.

Issued under TSCA Section 8(b)(10), this new chemical reporting requirement will enable EPA to fulfill a statutory mandate under the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act: Once every three years, EPA must release an “inventory of mercury supply, use, and trade” that includes data collected from industry.

EPA estimates the new reporting requirement—including time spent learning the new rule, determining applicability, etc.—will result in a burden of 72,600 hours and $5.8 million in the first year or reporting.
For more information on which industries may be affected by this rulemaking, see our coverage of the proposed rule published in October 2017.  


Who Is Excluded?

Not every facility that has mercury on site will be required to report. The following groups are not covered by the new mercury reporting requirement:
 
  • Persons who only generate, handle, or manage mercury-containing wastes
  • Persons who only manufacture mercury as an impurity
  • Persons engaged in activities involving mercury not with the purpose of obtaining an immediate or eventual commercial advantage
EPA is also working on exemptions for facilities that already report for mercury and mercury-containing products under TSCA Section 8(a) Chemical Data Reporting, or CDR, and the IMERC Mercury-added Products Database. 


TSCA Training—Anytime, Anywhere

Learn what you must know to achieve and maintain compliance with EPA’s Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) reporting, recordkeeping, and chemical management rules. The TSCA Regulations Online Course covers the detailed rules for handling, storing, processing, and manufacturing regulated chemical substances. Plus, learn what you must report, record, and keep on file to avoid TSCA fines.
 

Tags: EPA, mercury, new rules, reporting and recordkeeping, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor was great, explaining complex topics in terms that were easily understandable and answering questions clearly and thoroughly.

Brittany Holm

Lab Supervisor

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

As always, Lion never disappoints

Paul Resley

Environmental Coordinator

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Very well structured, comprehensive, and comparable to live training seminars I've participated in previously. I will recommend the online course to other colleagues with training requirement needs.

Neil Luciano

EHS Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Spot and correct 4 of the most common universal waste errors before they result in a notice of violation during a Federal or state inspection.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.