Search

Is It Recordable? Diagnosed Mental Illness

Posted on 3/25/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

Under OSHA's injury and illness reporting requirements, employers are not required to record mental illness as work-related unless the employee voluntarily provides the company with an opinion from a medical professional with “appropriate training and experience” stating that the employee has a mental illness that is work-related (29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix)).

Recently, an employer cited by OSHA for alleged injury and illness recordkeeping violations challenged those citations and asked a Federal appeals court “to narrowly define which medical professionals can diagnose mental-health illnesses.” The employer received a citation for declining to record mental illnesses cases reported by three employees following an explosion at the facility.

Each employee presented the employer with a diagnosis of a work-related mental health issue. The employer believed, however, that the persons who provided those diagnoses lacked the qualifications required by 29 CFR 1904. Therefore, the employer did not record these three cases as work related. 

An administrative law judge sided with the employer in part, vacating two of the three citations. For one case, the judge determined the diagnosing medical professional not qualified to make the diagnosis. In the second case, the judge ruled that the diagnoses was not work-related. The third citation was upheld because the company “didn’t provide any counter as to why the illness wasn’t work-related,” per the judge.

Is It Recordable? Diagnosed Mental Illness

OSHA and Work-related Mental Illness 

The OSHA recordkeeping regulation at 29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix) reads: 

You are not required to record injuries and illnesses if... The illness is a mental illness. Mental illness will not be considered work-related unless the employee voluntarily provides the employer with an opinion from a physician or other licensed health care professional with appropriate training and experience (psychiatrist, psychologist, psychiatric nurse practitioner, etc.) stating that the employee has a mental illness that is work-related.

29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix)


Because the word “appropriate” (meaning “especially suitable or compatible”) appears in the regulation above, the Court assessed whether each diagnosing provider had training that was “especially suitable" and “compatible” with that of professionals listed in the regulation (e.g., psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric nurse practitioners).

While the Court vacated two of the three citations, the judge ultimately rejected the employer's request to more clearly define the criteria for diagnosing mental health cases. The court based its decision in part on the statement that “it is well established that…a standard must be construed so as to avoid an absurd result.” The Judge argued that it would be "absurd" to exclude a diagnosis from a medical professional whose profession is not listed but who nonetheless has the requisite training and experience to make the diagnosis in question. 
 

Self-paced, Online OSHA Health & Safety Training

Get online OSHA safety training that prepares workers to identify and protect themselves from workplace health and safety hazards, including many of OSHA's Top 10 Most Cited Standards.

Tags: osha, OSHA compliance

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I had a positive experience utilizing this educational program. It was very informative, convenient, and rewarding from a career perspective.

John Gratacos

Logistics Manager

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

I can't say enough how pleased I was with this course! Everything finally makes sense.

Kim Graham

Lab Manager

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.

Stephanie Gilliam

Material Production/Logistics Manager

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.

George Alva

Manufacturing Manager

Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.

John Hutchinson

Senior EHS Engineer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Decrease spill, release, and injury risk and increase savings with these "source reduction" strategies to prevent unused chemicals from becoming regulated as hazardous waste.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.