Search

Is It Recordable? Diagnosed Mental Illness

Posted on 3/25/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

Under OSHA's injury and illness reporting requirements, employers are not required to record mental illness as work-related unless the employee voluntarily provides the company with an opinion from a medical professional with “appropriate training and experience” stating that the employee has a mental illness that is work-related (29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix)).

Recently, an employer cited by OSHA for alleged injury and illness recordkeeping violations challenged those citations and asked a Federal appeals court “to narrowly define which medical professionals can diagnose mental-health illnesses.” The employer received a citation for declining to record mental illnesses cases reported by three employees following an explosion at the facility.

Each employee presented the employer with a diagnosis of a work-related mental health issue. The employer believed, however, that the persons who provided those diagnoses lacked the qualifications required by 29 CFR 1904. Therefore, the employer did not record these three cases as work related. 

An administrative law judge sided with the employer in part, vacating two of the three citations. For one case, the judge determined the diagnosing medical professional not qualified to make the diagnosis. In the second case, the judge ruled that the diagnoses was not work-related. The third citation was upheld because the company “didn’t provide any counter as to why the illness wasn’t work-related,” per the judge.

Is It Recordable? Diagnosed Mental Illness

OSHA and Work-related Mental Illness 

The OSHA recordkeeping regulation at 29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix) reads: 

You are not required to record injuries and illnesses if... The illness is a mental illness. Mental illness will not be considered work-related unless the employee voluntarily provides the employer with an opinion from a physician or other licensed health care professional with appropriate training and experience (psychiatrist, psychologist, psychiatric nurse practitioner, etc.) stating that the employee has a mental illness that is work-related.

29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix)


Because the word “appropriate” (meaning “especially suitable or compatible”) appears in the regulation above, the Court assessed whether each diagnosing provider had training that was “especially suitable" and “compatible” with that of professionals listed in the regulation (e.g., psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric nurse practitioners).

While the Court vacated two of the three citations, the judge ultimately rejected the employer's request to more clearly define the criteria for diagnosing mental health cases. The court based its decision in part on the statement that “it is well established that…a standard must be construed so as to avoid an absurd result.” The Judge argued that it would be "absurd" to exclude a diagnosis from a medical professional whose profession is not listed but who nonetheless has the requisite training and experience to make the diagnosis in question. 
 

Self-paced, Online OSHA Health & Safety Training

Get online OSHA safety training that prepares workers to identify and protect themselves from workplace health and safety hazards, including many of OSHA's Top 10 Most Cited Standards.

Tags: osha, OSHA compliance

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor created a great learning environment.

Avinash Thummadi

CAD & Environmental Manager

The instructor kept the class engaged and made learning fun. There was a lot of information to cover but time flew by. I will definitely use Lion in the future!

Chelsea Minguela

Hazmat Shipping Professional

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

I can't say enough how pleased I was with this course! Everything finally makes sense.

Kim Graham

Lab Manager

The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.

Misty Filipp

Material Control Superintendent

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!

Tony Petrik

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

In-flight hazmat incidents can be disastrous. This guide gives 5 tips for first-time air shippers to consider before offering dangerous goods for transportation on passenger or cargo aircraft.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.