Lion.com will be offline from 11:00 PM ET on March 22, to 6:00 AM ET on March 23, for updates. For trouble logging in or accessing Lion.com after this period, please call 862-271-4199 or 888-LION-511.
Search

Is It Recordable? Diagnosed Mental Illness

Posted on 3/25/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

Under OSHA's injury and illness reporting requirements, employers are not required to record mental illness as work-related unless the employee voluntarily provides the company with an opinion from a medical professional with “appropriate training and experience” stating that the employee has a mental illness that is work-related (29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix)).

Recently, an employer cited by OSHA for alleged injury and illness recordkeeping violations challenged those citations and asked a Federal appeals court “to narrowly define which medical professionals can diagnose mental-health illnesses.” The employer received a citation for declining to record mental illnesses cases reported by three employees following an explosion at the facility.

Each employee presented the employer with a diagnosis of a work-related mental health issue. The employer believed, however, that the persons who provided those diagnoses lacked the qualifications required by 29 CFR 1904. Therefore, the employer did not record these three cases as work related. 

An administrative law judge sided with the employer in part, vacating two of the three citations. For one case, the judge determined the diagnosing medical professional not qualified to make the diagnosis. In the second case, the judge ruled that the diagnoses was not work-related. The third citation was upheld because the company “didn’t provide any counter as to why the illness wasn’t work-related,” per the judge.

Is It Recordable? Diagnosed Mental Illness

OSHA and Work-related Mental Illness 

The OSHA recordkeeping regulation at 29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix) reads: 

You are not required to record injuries and illnesses if... The illness is a mental illness. Mental illness will not be considered work-related unless the employee voluntarily provides the employer with an opinion from a physician or other licensed health care professional with appropriate training and experience (psychiatrist, psychologist, psychiatric nurse practitioner, etc.) stating that the employee has a mental illness that is work-related.

29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix)


Because the word “appropriate” (meaning “especially suitable or compatible”) appears in the regulation above, the Court assessed whether each diagnosing provider had training that was “especially suitable" and “compatible” with that of professionals listed in the regulation (e.g., psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric nurse practitioners).

While the Court vacated two of the three citations, the judge ultimately rejected the employer's request to more clearly define the criteria for diagnosing mental health cases. The court based its decision in part on the statement that “it is well established that…a standard must be construed so as to avoid an absurd result.” The Judge argued that it would be "absurd" to exclude a diagnosis from a medical professional whose profession is not listed but who nonetheless has the requisite training and experience to make the diagnosis in question. 
 

Self-paced, Online OSHA Health & Safety Training

Get online OSHA safety training that prepares workers to identify and protect themselves from workplace health and safety hazards, including many of OSHA's Top 10 Most Cited Standards.

Tags: osha, OSHA compliance

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!

Oscar Fisher

EHS Manager

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.

Tom Berndt

HSE Coordinator

Lion's online training is more comprehensive, has better slides, and is a superior training experience than what I would get from other trainers.

Robert Brenner

District Environmental Manager

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.

Teresa Arellanes

EHS Manager

I really enjoy your workshops. Thank you for such a great program and all the help Lion has provided me over the years!

George Chatman

Hazardous Material Pharmacy Technician

Very well structured, comprehensive, and comparable to live training seminars I've participated in previously. I will recommend the online course to other colleagues with training requirement needs.

Neil Luciano

EHS Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.