Lion's office will be closed on Monday, September 1, in observance of Labor Day. For help with online training, please contact support@lion.com.
Search

EPA May Repeal "Fugitive Emissions" Exemption from Air Programs

Posted on 10/17/2022 by Roger Marks

US EPA has proposed to repeal amendments to the Clean Air Act that exempt “fugitive emissions” from counting toward key permitting thresholds under two New Source Review (NSR) programs for existing major sources in some industry categories.    

If the amendments are repealed, all major sources will be required to include fugitive emissions when determining whether a facility modification is “major” or not under NSR.

Amendments to the Clean Air Act standards made in 2008 allowed source categories that are not listed in the regulations to exclude fugitive emissions from the “major modification” count (see “Fugitive Emissions Rule”, 72 FR 77882).

The proposed change will impact existing major sources of air pollution only. The proposed action will not change the way fugitive emissions are handled when making a “major source” determination.

EPA will accept public comments on the proposed rule until December 13, 2022. In the October 14 Federal Register, EPA also says that “If anyone contacts EPA requesting a public hearing by October 19, 2022, the EPA will hold a virtual public hearing.”

What Are Fugitive Emissions?

Under the New Source Review program, EPA defines “fugitive emissions” this way:

Fugitive emissions means those emissions which could not reasonably pass through a stack, chimney, vent, or other functionally equivalent opening.

[40 CFR 51.166(b)(20)]

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) leaking from pipes or equipment at a petroleum refinery is an example of fugitive emissions that EPA provides in its proposal (87 FR 62325).

Read More: What is a Major Modification Under New Source Review?

How Does This Affect New Source Review (NSR)?

Before a physical or operational change can be made at an existing major source facility, the business must consider additional pollution that the change will cause. A modification is considered a major modification if it will cause a “significant net increase” in emissions of a regulated NSR pollutant or pollutants.  

NSR regulated pollutants are the six “criteria pollutants” and their precursors—carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, ozone (and VOCs), and lead.

Major modifications require a permit under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) programs. PSD and NNSR apply in areas designated as in attainment or in non-attainment of air pollution limits for NSR regulated pollutants, respectively.

If currently exempted major sources are required to count fugitive emissions in the future, and if those fugitive emissions cause a modification to exceed a threshold for any covered pollutant, a permit will be required before the modification can be made.

EPA May Repeal "Fugitive Emissions" Exemption from Air Programs

Final Environmental Training in 2022

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, and more—is a major challenge.

If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, don’t miss Lion’s final Complete Environmental Regulations Webinar of the year on December 5—6.  

Or train on environmental compliance topics at your own pace: 

Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: air pollution, Clean Air Act, environmental compliance, fugitive emissions, New Source Review

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.

Jim Jani

Environmental Coordinator

The instructor was great, explaining complex topics in terms that were easily understandable and answering questions clearly and thoroughly.

Brittany Holm

Lab Supervisor

Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!

Tony Petrik

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!

Amanda Walsh

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

No comparison. Lion has the best RCRA training ever!!

Matt Sabine

Environmental Specialist

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Four key considerations to help you maximize the convenience and quality of your experience with online training.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.