Search

Airbag Warning: Do Not Drive These Pre-2016 Car Models

Posted on 8/26/2024 by Lion Technology Inc.

Citing potentially lethal danger from unreplaced Takata airbag inflators, car makers Ford and Mazda issued “Do Not Drive” orders for several older vehicle models this month.

When the defective airbag inflators deploy, the “explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants, resulting in serious injury or death,” warns the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

The Do Not Drive orders cover nearly 500,000 vehicles released by Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, or Mazda between 2003 and 2015 that were previously recalled and have not been repaired.

See the announcement from NHTSA.

Airbag Warning: Do Not Drive These Pre-2016 Car Models

The orders from Ford and Mazda are the latest action from manufacturers who have weathered the Takata recall for many years. Several automakers have issued Do Not Drive orders since the recall effort began, including Acura, BMW, Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, Honda, Infiniti, Mazda, Nissan, Pontiac, and Toyota.

“Tens of millions of vehicles with Takata air bags are under recall,” regulators warn.

The industry-wide effort to recall and replace defective airbags started more than a decade ago. In that time, these devices have caused dozens of deaths (including 27 in the US) and injured hundreds. Takata declared bankruptcy in 2017.

The Washington Post reports that, per Carfax, more than 6 million cars are still equipped with defective air bags.

Motorists in the US can check the status of ongoing vehicle recalls at NHTSA’s website: Check for Recalls.

BMW Airbag Recall: July 2024

In July 2024, BMW recalled nearly 400,000 older 3 Series models (2006—2011).

In a public notice, the NHTSA warns BMW drivers about “a sport or M-sport steering wheel equipped with a Takata driver’s front air bag module that contains a PSDI-5 inflater that could have been installed by an owner, even though it was not officially offered/approved by BMW…”

Why Are Car Airbags Regulated as a Hazardous Material in Transportation?

Since the 2015 US DOT PHMSA rulemaking to harmonize US regulations with international standards, safety devices must be described in transportation in one of two ways:

  • UN3268, Safety devices, electrically initiated, 9
  • UN0503, Safety devices, pyrotechnic, 1.4G

The first of these two is reserved for safety devices that pass specific testing criteria found in Special Provision 160 and have been certified by a PHMSA-approved explosives testing lab.

Class 9 hazardous materials are excepted from the more stringent labeling, marking, and shipping paper requirements that apply to safety devices shipped as explosive materials (1.4G). Also, if a safety device is not "used in vehicles, vessels or aircraft to enhance safety to persons,” it cannot qualify for Class 9 reliefs.

Training to Ship Hazmat Safety Devices

The Shipping Airbags and Other Automotive Safety Devices online course prepares shippers to ensure compliance with detailed US and international regulations for classifying, packaging, marking, labeling, and documenting shipments of safety devices like airbag inflators, airbag modules, and seatbelt pretensioners.

Access training from any internet connection, stop and start as needed to fit your schedule, and receive a trusted Certificate from Lion Technology when you complete the course.

Tags: airbag, hazardous materials

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.

Amanda Oswald

Shipping Professional

The instructor kept the class engaged and made learning fun. There was a lot of information to cover but time flew by. I will definitely use Lion in the future!

Chelsea Minguela

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.

Stephanie Gilliam

Material Production/Logistics Manager

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

I have attended other training providers, but Lion is best. Lion is king of the hazmat jungle!!!

Henry Watkins

Hazardous Waste Technician

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Find out what makes DOT hazmat training mandatory for employees who sign the hazardous waste manifest, a “dually regulated” document for tracking shipments.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.