Search

How GHS Labels Will Affect Chemical Shipments

Posted on 2/17/2015 by Scott Dunsmore

When OSHA revised its Hazard Communication Standard to align with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) in 2012, the worlds of hazardous materials shipping and workplace safety collided. Starting June 1, 2015, shippers must comply with the new classification, labeling, and documentation standards of OSHA's revised HazCom Standard. Many suppliers already use the new GHS labels, and overlapping DOT and OSHA hazard communication labeling standards have caused confusion for shippers at best and shipping delays at worst, especially for air shipments.
DOT Hazmat and OSHA GHS Hazcom Labels

GHS and DOT Labels on the Same Package

In some cases, the workplace container that holds a hazardous chemical will also be the package in which the material is shipped (e.g., a 5-gallon 1A1 drum containing a flammable liquid paint thinner). Because this material is subject to both OSHA workplace hazard communication requirements and US DOT's Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), both GHS HazCom and DOT hazmat labels and pictograms may be present.

GHS Labels on Non-hazmat Shipments

There are situations in which a package that requires OSHA GHS labels does not require hazmat shipping labels. In these situations, the GHS labels may cause confusion, raise questions from freight forwarders or carriers, and even delay the shipment.

For example, GHS includes a health hazard class for "Serious Eye Damage/Eye Irritation" [GHS, Chapter 3.3]. Materials in Category 1 of this GHS hazard class require labels with the "corrosion" pictogram. However, unless the material also meets the 49 CFR or IATA DGR definition of a corrosive material (i.e., it can destroy skin tissue or metal), then no hazmat shipping label is required. IATA's 56th Edition Dangerous Goods Regulations (IATA DGR) addresses this issue with a new note in the regulation for hidden dangerous goods in Section 2.

 
"Diamond-shaped GHS pictograms on packages may indicate the presence of dangerous goods. While some pictograms identify substances that only pose a hazard for supply and use, other GHS pictograms contain symbols that are largely equivalent to the symbols contained in the hazard labels used in transport, and which may therefore be classified as dangerous goods." [Note to IATA DGR 2.2.2]

If you are shipping a material that is not regulated by the IATA DGR (or other hazmat regulation), but does require GHS labeling, taking the following measures can minimize potential delays:
  • Contact your carriers in advance. Provide information that they may need to ensure your classification is correct and complete.
  • Include a statement on your shipping paperwork that indicates the material is not regulated under the hazmat shipping requirements.
  • Include a marking on the package indicating that the material is not subject to the hazmat shipping requirements.
By discussing your products with your carriers prior to shipment, you can minimize delays during transportation.

Prepare for the June 1 Deadline

Gain clarity about the relationship between GHS requirements and 49 CFR hazmat labeling standards and be prepared before the June 1 deadline. Join the next session of the live, instructor-led GHS Compliance for Hazmat Shippers Webinar on March 17 from 1 to 3 PM ET. The webinar will help you get ready to conquer the challenges hazmat shippers face now that OSHA's new GHS rules are imminent. Don't let hazard labeling delay your shipments, confuse your supply-chain partners, or subject you to DOT or OSHA civil penalties-sign up now.


Tags: DOT, GHS, HazCom, hazmat shipping, IATA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

This is the best RCRA training I've experienced! I will be visiting Lion training again.

Cynthia L. Logsdon

Principal Environmental Engineer

These are the best classes I attend each year. I always take something away and implement improvements at my sites.

Kim Racine

EH&S Manager

Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!

Marti Severs

Enterprise Safety Manager

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

The instructor does a great job at presenting material in an approachable way. I have been able to save my company about $30,000 in the last year with what I have learned from Lion!

Curtis Ahonen

EHS&S Manager

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Explore ten hazardous waste management errors that caused generators in California the most trouble last year.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.