Search

TSCA Chemical Data Reporting: The New Form U and You

Posted on 1/10/2012 by James Griffin

On August 16, 2011 (76 FR 50816), EPA published its new Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule, replacing the previously existing Inventory Update Report (IUR) Rule. While the form for submitting data remains the same (the Form U), some key information has changed.
 
History
In 1978, EPA compiled what is now known as the TSCA Master Inventory. In addition to mechanisms for adding new chemicals to the inventory (a subject for another time), EPA also requires manufacturers and importers to periodically submit specific information about substances on the inventory, including recent publications and site data, to better track the presence of these chemicals in the marketplace.
 
Between 1978 and 2006, EPA amended the Inventory Update Rule a number of times. In 2011, EPA considered making some major changes. The result was a delay in the announced reporting due date. Originally, data on 2010 production was due in mid-2011, but EPA told sites subject to the IUR to hold off on data submission until the new rule was finalized.
 
What’s the difference between the IUR and the CDR?
 The August 16, 2011 rule did more than just change the name of the reporting requirement. It also changed:
 
  • The location of the regulations. The IUR rules were in 40 CFR 710. The CDR rules are in 40 CFR 711.
  • The frequency of reporting. The IUR was on a five-year cycle. The CDR is a 4-year cycle. The current report is due in 2012 and the next reporting year will be 2016.
  • The submission period. Instead of the usual June 1 through September 30 period, the report is due between February 1 and June 30, 2012. (The June—September period will be reinstated for the 2016 report.)
Who is subject to CDR?
“For the 2012 submission period, any person who manufactured (including imported) for commercial purposes 25,000 lbs. (11,430 kg) or more of a chemical substance [on the inventory] at any single site owned or controlled by that person during the principal reporting year (i.e., calendar year 2011) is subject to reporting.” [40 CFR 711.8(a)]
 
Will there be more changes?
In addition to returning the submission period to June through September for the 2016 reporting year, there will be other changes. For 2016, any person who manufactured 25,000 lbs. or more of a chemical substance on the Inventory in ANY calendar year since the previous reporting year will have to submit the Form U in 2016.

Tags: EPA, reporting and recordkeeping, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

Very good. I have always appreciated the way Lion Tech develops, presents and provides training and materials.

John Troy

Environmental Specialist

I like Lion's workshops the best because they really dig into the information you need to have when you leave the workshop.

Tom Bush, Jr.

EHS Manager

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

Best course instructor I've ever had. Funny, relatable, engaging; made it interesting and challenged us as the professionals we are.

Amanda Schwartz

Environmental Coordinator

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

This report details major changes for hazardous waste generators from US EPA’s Generator Improvements Rule, as well as the latest updates from states that are still working to adopt new, stricter Federal requirements.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.