EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 6/13
The EPA enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why the Agency assesses civil penalties for environmental noncompliance. All violations mentioned are alleged unless we indicate otherwise.
We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy.
WHO: A packaging and construction materials manufacturer
Three affiliated facilities in the Southeast allegedly failed to properly operate and monitor their industrial flares, which resulted in excess emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), according to a settlement with EPA. The facilities will perform air quality monitoring designed to detect benzene at the fence lines. Monitoring results must be made publicly available online to provide neighboring communities with more information about their air quality.
WHERE: Lake Charles, LA and Calvert City, KY
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1 million plus $110 million in site improvements
The three facilities must also install and operate air pollution control and monitoring technology to reduce flaring and the subsequent air pollution. Once fully implemented, the pollution controls are estimated to reduce emissions of ozone-forming VOCs by 2,258 tons per year, toxic air pollutants, (including benzene) by 65 tons per year, and greenhouse gases by over 50,733 tons per year.
WHO: A dental equipment supplier
EPA recently reached an agreement with a dental equipment provider after the company allegedly produced and sold two pesticides even after they were no longer registered with EPA. The products were designed to disinfect dental equipment. The company has since stopped making and selling the pesticides and agreed to pay a six-figure civil penalty.
WHERE: Cuyahoga Falls, OH
WHAT: FIFRA violations
HOW MUCH: $654,064
Under FIFRA, products that claim to kill, destroy, prevent, or repel bacteria or viruses, among other things on surfaces, are considered pesticides and must go through EPA’s registration process to ensure that the products perform as intended prior to their distribution or sale in commerce. Public health claims can only be made for products that have been registered with EPA.
WHO: A food processing facility
According to State environmental investigators, a tofu maker improperly shipped approximately 150 gallons of hazardous waste to a company in New Jersey that can only accept empty containers. Additionally, the hazardous waste was shipped without the correct hazardous waste shipping papers. The tofu company also exceeded the amount of hazardous waste it is authorized to generate under its registered waste generator status with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP).
WHERE: Ayer, MA
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $19,092
Under the terms of the agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty and use $14,319 of the penalty for a Supplemental Environmental Project. The project will pay for 50 percent of the hazardous materials disposal costs for nearby residents dropping off materials at a disposal event and pay for event marketing materials.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Tags: Clean Air Act, EPA, FIFRA, fines, hazardous waste management, penalties, RCRA, roundup
Find a Post
Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.
Chemical Laboratory Manager
The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.
I can't say enough how pleased I was with this course! Everything finally makes sense.
Lion was very responsive to my initial questions and the website was user friendly.
Supply Chain Director
The instructor was great, explaining complex topics in terms that were easily understandable and answering questions clearly and thoroughly.
Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.
This is a very informative training compared to others. It covers everything I expect to learn and even a lot of new things.
Waste Management Professional
The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.
These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!
EHS & Facility Engineer
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Explore the four specific 29 CFR Standards that OSHA inspectors overwhelmingly cite employers for when investigating COVID-19 exposure in the workplace.