Search

How NPDES Permit Rules Can Vary by State

Posted on 3/10/2015 by Anthony Cardno

When rainwater or melting snow flows over paved streets, parking lots, rooftops, and other surfaces at industrial and construction sites, the water can pick up debris, sediments, chemicals, and other pollutants before it runs down a storm drain. To prevent these pollutants from making surface waters unsafe for drinking, fishing, swimming, etc., US EPA regulations require facilities to obtain a permit in order to discharge stormwater from their sites. The program under which EPA issues these permits is called the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).

While the Federal government sets overall standards for individual permits (unique to a particular site) and general permits (covering groups of similarly situated dischargers), the majority of stormwater permits are implemented by State environmental agencies.

 
NPDES History

The Water Quality Act of 1987 required the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop NPDES permits for point source discharges of stormwater that violate the States' established water quality standards. When developing the NPDES permitting standards, EPA was charged with deciding which types of discharges would require a permit.

NPDES Permit Requirements

EPA's has created regulations at 40 CFR 122.26 that require permits for the following types of stormwater discharges:
  • For which a permit had previously been issued by the state
  • From municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s)
  • Associated with construction activity disturbing one or more acres
  • Associated with industrial activity (manufacturing, mining, oil and gas, etc.)
  • From other situations on a case-by-case basis
Stormwater at industry facility

State-level NPDES Variations

Each state can adjust the language of its permits to reflect the environmental realities in its region. State-level adjustments to the NPDES permit language often include variations to monitoring, control technology, reporting, recordkeeping, pollution prevention measures, and renewal requirements.

The three examples below illustrate how three very different US states manage stormwater permitting.

Arkansas

The state of Arkansas has adopted the Federal NPDES regulations by reference. In other words, an environmental manager looking for Arkansas' State NPDES regulations will be directed to the Federal rules in 40 CFR. For industry in its state, the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) has developed a Construction General Permit (ARR150000) and an Industrial General Permit (ARR00000).

The Construction permit is available to sites that disturb one or more acres. Sites that disturb five or more acres must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) and pay attendant fees to ADEQ prior to starting construction. Sites disturbing less than five acres do not need to submit an NOI but must create and post a construction site notice. All construction sites subject to the general permit must prepare and implement a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP).

Entities covered under the Industrial Stormwater general permit in Arkansas must submit an NOI and pay attendant fees to ADEQ prior to commencing activities. In addition, they must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) when activities cease and create and implement an SWPPP.

New Jersey

New Jersey's Stormwater Management Rule sets requirements more stringent than the Federal standards. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) issues a Basic Industrial Stormwater Permit (5G2) that is more restrictive than the Federal version of the permit.

The state also issues a Construction Activities General Permit (5G3) for any activity (even single-family home construction) that disturbs one or more acres of land. However, the New Jersey 5G3 permit does not cover construction at facilities involved in cement manufacturing, fertilizer manufacturing, steam electric, coal pile runoff, mineral mining and processing, ore mining and dressing and asphalt emulsion. Construction activity involving these sites requires an individual permit.

New Jersey issues stormwater general permits that cover discharges from other specific industries: scrap metal operations, concrete products manufacturing, hot mix asphalt production, concentrated animal feeding operations, and operations at Newark Airport.

Texas

The Industrial Stormwater Permit requirements of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) are more stringent than the US EPA rules as well. The permit covers discharges into any water of the state or any conveyance that is part of an MS4.

Another unique part of the Texas stormwater rules is that Texas assigns a rank to each facility's compliance history. Facilities with a poor compliance history ranking are not eligible to be covered under the General Permit and instead must apply for an individual permit.

These are just three examples of unique State-issued stormwater rules. When a facility analyzes its need for a stormwater discharge permit, it is critical that environmental managers check State requirements in addition to understanding the Federal US EPA NPDES program.

EPA Training on Water, Air, and Chemical Rules

NPDES permitting is just one of the major EPA programs covered at Lion's popular The Complete Environmental Regulations, presented in cities nationwide. If you're responsible for ensuring site compliance with the many complex programs—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, FIFRA, EPCRA, and more—this workshop will help you identify the requirements that apply to your facility and make decisions that put your environmental team in a position to succeed.


Tags: Act, Clean, EPA, NPDES, state rules, Water

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion courses are the standard to which all other workshops should strive for!

Brody Saleen

Registered Environmental Health Specialist

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

Amazing instructor; real-life examples. Lion training gets better every year!

Frank Papandrea

Environmental Manager

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.

Tom Berndt

HSE Coordinator

The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!

Brian Martinez

Warehouse Operator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Ace hazmat inspections. Protect personnel. Defend against civil and criminal penalties. How? See the self-audit "best practices" for hazardous materials shippers.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.