How NPDES Permit Rules Can Vary by State

Posted on 3/10/2015 by Anthony Cardno

When rainwater or melting snow flows over paved streets, parking lots, rooftops, and other surfaces at industrial and construction sites, the water can pick up debris, sediments, chemicals, and other pollutants before it runs down a storm drain. To prevent these pollutants from making surface waters unsafe for drinking, fishing, swimming, etc., US EPA regulations require facilities to obtain a permit in order to discharge stormwater from their sites. The program under which EPA issues these permits is called the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).

While the Federal government sets overall standards for individual permits (unique to a particular site) and general permits (covering groups of similarly situated dischargers), the majority of stormwater permits are implemented by State environmental agencies.

NPDES History

The Water Quality Act of 1987 required the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop NPDES permits for point source discharges of stormwater that violate the States' established water quality standards. When developing the NPDES permitting standards, EPA was charged with deciding which types of discharges would require a permit.

NPDES Permit Requirements

EPA's has created regulations at 40 CFR 122.26 that require permits for the following types of stormwater discharges:
  • For which a permit had previously been issued by the state
  • From municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s)
  • Associated with construction activity disturbing one or more acres
  • Associated with industrial activity (manufacturing, mining, oil and gas, etc.)
  • From other situations on a case-by-case basis
Stormwater at industry facility

State-level NPDES Variations

Each state can adjust the language of its permits to reflect the environmental realities in its region. State-level adjustments to the NPDES permit language often include variations to monitoring, control technology, reporting, recordkeeping, pollution prevention measures, and renewal requirements.

The three examples below illustrate how three very different US states manage stormwater permitting.


The state of Arkansas has adopted the Federal NPDES regulations by reference. In other words, an environmental manager looking for Arkansas' State NPDES regulations will be directed to the Federal rules in 40 CFR. For industry in its state, the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) has developed a Construction General Permit (ARR150000) and an Industrial General Permit (ARR00000).

The Construction permit is available to sites that disturb one or more acres. Sites that disturb five or more acres must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) and pay attendant fees to ADEQ prior to starting construction. Sites disturbing less than five acres do not need to submit an NOI but must create and post a construction site notice. All construction sites subject to the general permit must prepare and implement a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP).

Entities covered under the Industrial Stormwater general permit in Arkansas must submit an NOI and pay attendant fees to ADEQ prior to commencing activities. In addition, they must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) when activities cease and create and implement an SWPPP.

New Jersey

New Jersey's Stormwater Management Rule sets requirements more stringent than the Federal standards. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) issues a Basic Industrial Stormwater Permit (5G2) that is more restrictive than the Federal version of the permit.

The state also issues a Construction Activities General Permit (5G3) for any activity (even single-family home construction) that disturbs one or more acres of land. However, the New Jersey 5G3 permit does not cover construction at facilities involved in cement manufacturing, fertilizer manufacturing, steam electric, coal pile runoff, mineral mining and processing, ore mining and dressing and asphalt emulsion. Construction activity involving these sites requires an individual permit.

New Jersey issues stormwater general permits that cover discharges from other specific industries: scrap metal operations, concrete products manufacturing, hot mix asphalt production, concentrated animal feeding operations, and operations at Newark Airport.


The Industrial Stormwater Permit requirements of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) are more stringent than the US EPA rules as well. The permit covers discharges into any water of the state or any conveyance that is part of an MS4.

Another unique part of the Texas stormwater rules is that Texas assigns a rank to each facility's compliance history. Facilities with a poor compliance history ranking are not eligible to be covered under the General Permit and instead must apply for an individual permit.

These are just three examples of unique State-issued stormwater rules. When a facility analyzes its need for a stormwater discharge permit, it is critical that environmental managers check State requirements in addition to understanding the Federal US EPA NPDES program.

EPA Training on Water, Air, and Chemical Rules

NPDES permitting is just one of the major EPA programs covered at Lion's popular The Complete Environmental Regulations, presented in cities nationwide. If you're responsible for ensuring site compliance with the many complex programs—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, FIFRA, EPCRA, and more—this workshop will help you identify the requirements that apply to your facility and make decisions that put your environmental team in a position to succeed.

Tags: Act, Clean, EPA, NPDES, state rules, Water

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.

Tom Berndt

HSE Coordinator

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I had a positive experience utilizing this educational program. It was very informative, convenient, and rewarding from a career perspective.

John Gratacos

Logistics Manager

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

The instructor does a great job at presenting material in an approachable way. I have been able to save my company about $30,000 in the last year with what I have learned from Lion!

Curtis Ahonen

EHS&S Manager

Lion courses are the standard to which all other workshops should strive for!

Brody Saleen

Registered Environmental Health Specialist

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Just starting out with shipping lithium batteries? Not before you can answer the four fundamental questions form this guide.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.