EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 3/14

Posted on 3/13/2017 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.), hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA), and much more.
For the second time in six months, EPA in January raised its fines for noncompliance with major environmental programs. We hope that providing information about EPA enforcement cases will help you identify and fix noncompliance issues that could leave your company facing costly penalties and future liability.

Who: A specialty chemical firm
Where: Pasadena, TX
What: Failure to submit TSCA Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) data  
How much: $350,000

For alleged failure to submit TSCA chemical inventory information for 17 chemicals before the 2012 submission deadline, a global specialty chemical business with facilities in Pasadena, TX will pay $350,000 to US EPA.

Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), chemical manufacturers and importers are required to submit certain chemical production, processing, and use data to EPA once every four years using the e-CDR online web reporting tool. The TSCA reporting rules have become more robust since 2012, with EPA now requiring chemical manufacturers and importers to submit a broader range of data than ever before.

Questions about TSCA reporting?  The TSCA Regulations Online Course guides you through the critical element of this EPA chemical program, including what to report and keep on file to maintain compliance and avoid EPA fines.

Who: A candy company
Where: Forest Park, IL
What: Failure to comply with Clean Air Act NAAQS requirements
How Much: $158,500

candy store EPA fineDuring an unannounced compliance inspection, US EPA identified a number of Clean Air Act emissions violations at an Illinois candy facility. Specifically, EPA cited the facility for failure to properly operate a catalytic oxidizer to control emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). According to EPA, the facility failed to adequately monitor the temperature of the oxidizer during operations—which led to excess emissions.  

In addition to paying a six-figure civil penalty, the company will install a new digital temperature monitor on the oxidizer and improve record keeping practices.

Who: A horse racetrack
Where: Ozone Park, NY
What: Clean Water Act NPDES permit violations
How much: $150,000

This violation took place at a racetrack in New York, but EPA wasn’t there to place bets. Because the racetrack takes care of many horses, the facility is a concentrated animal feeding operation, or CAFO, under the Clean Water Act. 

Certain CAFO’s must comply with US EPA’s regulations for discharge of pollutants to waterways. Find out more about animal feeding operations at EPA’s website.

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise. Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
New! Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Just Launched! Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
The 2017 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.

Tags: Act, Air, Clean, Clean Water Act, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, fines and penalties, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion provided an excellent introduction to environmental regulations, making the transition to a new career as an EHS specialist less daunting of a task. Drinking from a fire hose when the flow of water is lessened, is much more enjoyable!

Stephanie Weathers

SHE Specialist

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Lion was very responsive to my initial questions and the website was user friendly.

Michael Britt

Supply Chain Director

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Ace hazmat inspections. Protect personnel. Defend against civil and criminal penalties. How? See the self-audit "best practices" for hazardous materials shippers.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.