Search

Revised Definition of WOTUS Proposed

Posted on 3/17/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

Updated 11/20/2025

A proposed rule to revise the definition of the “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) was published in the Federal Register today, November 20, 2025. The proposed rule from US EPA and the Department of the Army implements the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. EPA and considers feedback from a wide range of sources.

See the new definition of “waters of the United States” from the proposed rule:
Under the agencies’ proposed rule, the term “waters of the United States” would include (1) traditional navigable waters and the territorial seas; (2) most impoundments of “waters of the United States;” (3) relatively permanent tributaries of traditional navigable waters, the territorial seas, and impoundments; (4) wetlands adjacent (i.e., having a continuous surface connection) to traditional navigable waters, impoundments, and tributaries; and (5) lakes and ponds that are relatively permanent and have a continuous surface connection to a traditional navigable water, the territorial seas, or a tributary. The agencies are also proposing to amend the exclusions for waste treatment systems, prior converted cropland, and certain ditches, and to add an exclusion for groundwater. Finally, the agencies are proposing to add definitions for “continuous surface connection,” “ditch,” “prior converted cropland,” “relatively permanent,” “tributary,” and “waste treatment system.”
Federal Register 52498, Updated Definition of the “Waters of the United States”
US EPA will accept comments on the proposed rule until January 5, 2026.

Revised Definition of WOTUS Proposed


Updated 03/25/2025 

EPA officially announced plans to revise the definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS) in the Federal Register on March 24. In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Sackett v. EPA, EPA is also seeking input from the regulated community about the meaning and scope of key regulatory terms such as relatively permanent waterscontinuous surface connection, and jurisdictional ditches.

Stakeholders and the public are invited to submit comments in writing or participate in upcoming WOTUS listening sessions to be hosted by EPA in April-May 2025. 

Read more: "WOTUS Notice: The Final Response to SCOTUS"

2025 WOTUS Guidance From EPA, Army Engineers

US EPA has announced plans to revise, again, its definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act. The regulatory definition of WOTUS determines, in part, which bodies of water—e.g., streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands, etc.—are protected by Federal law/regulations. 

The Agency, with the US Army Corps of Engineers, also provided new guidance on how the Clean Water Act will be enforced under this administration. Changes to the Waters of the US definition affect industry compliance with Federal water protection programs including: 
  • Oil Discharge Notifications (40 CFR 110);
  • Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plans (40 CFR 112);
  • NPDES Permitting and Stormwater Discharge Permits (40 CFR 122);
  • The “per-industry standards” (40 CFR 405-471); and
  • Dredge and Fill Permitting (33 CFR 323).

Why Change the WOTUS Definition Under the CWA?

In the Clean Water Act, Congress authorizes US EPA to regulate all “navigable waters.” How regulators interpret the term “navigable waters” has been the central issue of legal challenges for decades, including in two landmark Supreme Court cases—Rapanos v. United States (2006) and Sackett v. EPA (2012). The resolution of both cases led EPA to revise the definition of WOTUS.

One specific, long-running challenge for EPA has been to provide definitive, clear direction about the status of wetlands that are somehow “connected to” protected waters. 

Read more: Impact of Sackett v. EPA on CWA Compliance 

March 2025 WOTUS Guidance from EPA

EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers issued new joint guidance on WOTUS for the regulated community on March 12, 2025. It seems likely that any future rule to revise the Clean Water Act regulations will reflect the policy stated in this latest memo. 

EPA is interpreting WOTUS to include: 

“only those adjacent wetlands that have a continuous surface connection because they directly abut [a jurisdictional water] (e.g. they are not separated by uplands, a berm dike, or similar feature).” 

Wetlands that are “far removed from and not directly abutting covered waters” do not meet the legal standard to be a WOTUS, per the March 12 guidance. 

The memorandum also says: 

“The Sackett Court recognized that there may be some instances where that line drawing problem is difficult, such as during periods of drought or low tide or in those instances where there may be temporary interruptions in surface connection. The agencies will work to resolve these scenarios on a case-by-case basis and provide further clarity when appropriate…” 

Read the joint guidance from EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers:
“Continuous Surface Connection Under the Definition of WOTUS Under the CWA” 

Public Input on Future WOTUS Rule

EPA is also announcing public listening sessions and an open public comment docket to encourage input on post-Sackett WOTUS implementation from industry stakeholders, environmental and conservation groups, and the public. Listening sessions and the deadline for public comments will be announced in the Federal Register under the title "WOTUS Notice: The Final Response to SCOTUS." 

2025 Environmental Regulations Training

Gain solid footing amid non-stop updates and revisions on EPA air, water, and chemical programs! Join an experienced, credentialed instructor for the next live Complete Environmental Regulations Webinar on May 15–16, 2025.

EH&S professionals who attend can identify the regulations that apply to their facility and locate key requirements to achieve compliance with the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to EPCRA, TSCA, Superfund, and more. Prefer to train at your own pace? Try the interactive online course.

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

No comparison. Lion has the best RCRA training ever!!

Matt Sabine

Environmental Specialist

The instructor created a great learning environment.

Avinash Thummadi

CAD & Environmental Manager

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.

Amanda Oswald

Shipping Professional

The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.

Teresa Arellanes

EHS Manager

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!

Oscar Fisher

EHS Manager

Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.

Jim Jani

Environmental Coordinator

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

As always, Lion never disappoints

Paul Resley

Environmental Coordinator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Your hazmat paperwork is the first thing a DOT inspector will ask for during an inspection. From hazmat training records to special permits, make sure your hazmat documents are in order.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.