EPA On Track for 2030 ODS Phase Out

Posted on 5/16/2019 by Anthony Cardno, CHMM

The Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer was signed on September 16, 1987 and has been ratified by 197 parties (all member states of the United Nations, as well as Niue, the Cook Islands, the Holy See, and the European Union), making it the most universally adopted UN treaty or protocol in history. The Protocol called for the phase-out of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) by certain deadlines in order to facilitate stratospheric ozone protection and recovery.

Chemical manufacturing, chemical production, and chemical import are all affected by this phase-out. But how has the phase-out been managed in the United States?

Ozone-depleting Substances: Class Determinations

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted essentially a “worst first” approach to phasing out ODS, accomplished by establishing two classes of ODS: Class I and Class II.

Clean Air Act Risk Management Plan (RMP) violations are a common misstep for businesses that use regulated refrigerants. Keep your facility up to date with the latest EPA standards with the Clean Air Act Regulations Online Course.

Class I Ozone-depleting Substances

Class I ozone-depleting substances are mostly chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) that were either listed in Title VI of the Clean Air Act (CAA) when Congress amended the law to empower EPA to enact regulations in support of the Montreal Protocol (such as tricholorethane and trichlorofluoromethane) or were added later by the EPA (such as methyl bromide and chlorobromomethane). These are the substances considered to have the greatest potential to permanently damage the stratospheric ozone layer.

Class II Ozone-depleting Substances

Class II ODS are largely hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), chemicals originally intended to replace the Class I ODS but almost as bad for the stratospheric ozone layer. This group includes substances such as pentachlorofluoropropane and dichlorofluoromethane.

The Phase-Out

Class I ODS were scheduled to be phased out of production by January 1, 2000 (with the exception of methyl chloroform, which was scheduled to be phased out by January 1, 2002). [57 FR 33754] Methyl Bromide’s phase-out was completed in 2005.

Class II ODS follow a different schedule, with full HCFC phase-out of production and consumption to be accomplished by 2030. While HCFC reduction is incremental each year, they are still in use in the United States for the time being.

Refrigerant blends that include Class II ODS are also due to be phased out by 2030. This includes, for instance, blends that contain HCFC-22 (monochlorodifluoromethane), such as R-401A, R-402A, R-408A, R-409A, R-414B, and R-502A.

Further reading: Managing Ozone-depleting Substances in Refrigerating Appliances

Significant New Alternative Policy (SNAP)  

As part of implementing the Montreal Protocol, Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 612 authorizes the EPA to use the Significant New Alternative Policy (SNAP) to find new substances to replace the phased-out ODS as adhesives, coatings, inks, aerosols, cleaning solvents, fire suppression and explosion protection, foam-blowing agents, refrigerants, sterilants, and tobacco expansion agents. Manufacturers, formulators, and end users can submit proposed substitutes for ODS to the Agency. The EPA then classifies proposed alternative substances as either:
  • Acceptable (reduce overall risk to human health and the environment compared to other substitutes for a particular end-use);
  • Acceptable subject to use conditions (okay only if used in a certain way);
  • Acceptable subject to narrowed use limits (certain specialized applications); or
  • Unacceptable (prohibited, pose significantly higher health/environmental risks).
The EPA’s newest expansion of the list of acceptable substitutes, Notice #34, was issued on October 4, 2018. That notice, as well as all previous Notices and Rules (covering substitutes deemed unacceptable or subject to use conditions/limits) can be found at

Progress Made on the Ozone Layer

Since the ratification of the Montreal Protocol, the ozone layer is recovering. So far, phasing out ozone-depleting substances has reduced greenhouse gas emissions significantly. The UN predicts that, if the gains made since 1987 hold, the upper ozone layer above the Northern Hemisphere will be fully recovered by the 2030s. The Antarctic ozone hole is expected to be completely gone sometime around mid-century.

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Master EPA regulations anytime, anywhere with these convenient, interactive online courses:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
The 2019 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.

Tags: Clean Air Act, EPA, HCFC, ozone

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.

Amanda Oswald

Shipping Professional

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Your hazmat paperwork is the first thing a DOT inspector will ask for during an inspection. From hazmat training records to special permits, make sure your hazmat documents are in order.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.