EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 5/10
Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.
Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
WHO: A construction company
A California construction company was ordered to pay a $2 million civil penalty for alleged violations of its stormwater permit. According to the US District Court, the company allegedly discharged lead, copper, pentachlorophenol, and zinc into Hall Creek, a Mad River tributary that exceeded permissible quantities, potentially threatening the local salmon population.
Other alleged violations include failure to implement plans, technologies, monitoring, and other preventative procedures and mechanisms, as well as failure to comply with reporting requirements of the Clean Water Act.
WHO: A biopharmaceutical research facility
A research facility focused on blood-plasma treatments announced a settlement with the EPA to resolve alleged violations related to its chemical management practices. According to EPA, the research facility allegedly failed to develop written operating procedures for safely conducting activities, implement a mechanical integrity program, implement an emergency response program with instructions on the use of relevant equipment, and meet recordkeeping requirements.
The company has already taken steps to comply with Clean Air Act’s Risk Management Plan requirements by hiring additional personnel to address the alleged violations. It has also agreed to pay a six-figure civil penalty.
WHO: An agricultural servicer
EPA has reached an agreement with a company that provides crop maintenance services over alleged FIFRA violations. After a series of inspections by State and Federal investigators, EPA found that the company allegedly produced pesticides in an unregistered establishment, distributed and sold misbranded pesticides, and failed to maintain equipment properly.
EPA claims two pesticides were being repackaged and distributed with improper labeling. While at the facilities, inspectors also found that a secondary containment unit and loading pad, both used to contain potential spills, were allegedly not up to industry standards.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
WHO: A construction company
WHERE: McKinleyville, CA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $2,087,750
A California construction company was ordered to pay a $2 million civil penalty for alleged violations of its stormwater permit. According to the US District Court, the company allegedly discharged lead, copper, pentachlorophenol, and zinc into Hall Creek, a Mad River tributary that exceeded permissible quantities, potentially threatening the local salmon population.Other alleged violations include failure to implement plans, technologies, monitoring, and other preventative procedures and mechanisms, as well as failure to comply with reporting requirements of the Clean Water Act.
WHO: A biopharmaceutical research facility
WHERE: Bradley, IL
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $527,144
A research facility focused on blood-plasma treatments announced a settlement with the EPA to resolve alleged violations related to its chemical management practices. According to EPA, the research facility allegedly failed to develop written operating procedures for safely conducting activities, implement a mechanical integrity program, implement an emergency response program with instructions on the use of relevant equipment, and meet recordkeeping requirements.The company has already taken steps to comply with Clean Air Act’s Risk Management Plan requirements by hiring additional personnel to address the alleged violations. It has also agreed to pay a six-figure civil penalty.
WHO: An agricultural servicer
WHERE: Rio Oso, CA
WHAT: FIFRA violations
HOW MUCH: $50,578
EPA has reached an agreement with a company that provides crop maintenance services over alleged FIFRA violations. After a series of inspections by State and Federal investigators, EPA found that the company allegedly produced pesticides in an unregistered establishment, distributed and sold misbranded pesticides, and failed to maintain equipment properly.EPA claims two pesticides were being repackaged and distributed with improper labeling. While at the facilities, inspectors also found that a secondary containment unit and loading pad, both used to contain potential spills, were allegedly not up to industry standards.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Tags: chemical management, chemicals, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, EPA Enforcement Roundup, FIFRA, fines, penalties, Risk Management Plan
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
In-flight hazmat incidents can be disastrous. This guide gives 5 tips for first-time air shippers to consider before offering dangerous goods for transportation on passenger or cargo aircraft.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.