EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 5/30
The EPA enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why the Agency assesses civil penalties for environmental noncompliance. All violations mentioned are alleged unless we indicate otherwise.
We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy.
WHO: A waste incineration facility
An investigation by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency concluded that employees at a now-closed incinerator improperly labeled and handled hazardous waste on numerous occasions since 1996. The Agency also claims that the incinerator failed to monitor levels of hazardous materials , such as mercury, lead, and nickel in certain waste streams between 2014 and 2020.
WHERE: Cottage Grove, MN
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $2.8 million
The facility made two dozen corrections to resolve the alleged violations and achieve compliance with its hazardous waste permit. In August 2021, the company announced plans to shut down the incinerator and shift operations to another facility in Massachusetts.
WHO: A power station
EPA reached an agreement with a power hub in Colorado to resolve alleged groundwater contamination issues and ensure the proper closure of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) surface impoundments. Produced primarily from the burning of coal, CCR is a large industrial waste stream that can contain harmful levels of contaminants such as mercury, cadmium, and arsenic. Without proper management, contaminants from CCR can pollute waterways, groundwater, drinking water, and the air.
WHERE: Pueblo, CO
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $925,000
According to the agreement, the company failed to monitor groundwater under the facility, conduct statistical analysis of groundwater data, and establish groundwater background contaminant concentrations. The company has agreed to design a groundwater monitoring system that meets CCR program requirements and implement a corrective measures plan.
WHO: A construction equipment company
According to EPA, a New England construction company allegedly failed to obtain permit coverage at a construction site in Lancaster, MA. Due to a lack of erosion controls at the site, sediment runoff from this site impacted nearby wetlands. Dirt, sediment, and other pollutants carried off construction sites can damage aquatic habitat, contribute to algal blooms, and physically clog streams and pipes.
WHERE: Lancaster, MA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $18,000
The company has since agreed to pay the civil penalty and adhere to the terms of its permit for discharging stormwater. All construction sites one acre or larger with the potential to discharge stormwater to surface waters are required to obtain coverage under EPA's General Permit for Discharges from Construction Activities, comply with the terms of the permit, and thereby minimize sediment discharges.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Find a Post
Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.
The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.
Material Release Agent
This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.
I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.
I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.
The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.
Hazardous Waste Professional
The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
I can't say enough how pleased I was with this course! Everything finally makes sense.
I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!
Senior Environmental Engineer
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Just starting out with shipping lithium batteries? Not before you can answer the four fundamental questions form this guide.