Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 11/15

Posted on 11/15/2021 by Lauren Scott

Industrial facilities in the United States are subject to complex, overlapping environmental regulations concerning air emissions, discharges to water, hazardous waste management and disposal, oil spills, chemical management, and more. Failure to comply with all applicable US EPA requirements can result in future liability and civil penalties as high as $100,000+ per day, per violation (and growing every year).

The EPA enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why the Agency assesses civil penalties for environmental noncompliance. All violations mentioned are alleged unless we indicate otherwise.

We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A supermarket chain
WHERE: Concord, CA
WHAT: FIFRA violations
HOW MUCH: $206,805

In March 2021, EPA conducted an inspection at a grocery store in California and found that the store allegedly sold an unregistered antibacterial spray to 28 customers. According to EPA, the disinfectant made unsubstantiated claims about its use against COVID-19.

Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), products that claim to kill or repel bacteria or germs, including disinfectants, are considered pesticides and must be registered with EPA. EPA maintains a list of approved products that have been proven effective against COVID-19.
 

WHO: An oil refinery
WHERE: Carson, CA
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $87,276

A California oil refinery agreed to a settlement with EPA over alleged unpermitted accumulations of hazardous waste. The oil-bearing hazardous waste included multiple types of sludge and solids from the petroleum refining process.

Instead of disposing of the oil-based hazardous waste off site, the company agreed to process the excess hazardous waste into usable product by December 31, 2021, contingent upon additional EPA oversight of the process.
 

WHO: A municipality
WHERE: Pāhala and Nāʻālehu, HI
WHAT: Safe Drinking Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $28,500

In June 2017, EPA and a municipality in Hawai’i voluntarily entered into an order to close five large capacity cesspools (LCCs) and complete a wastewater treatment facility as a replacement. The wastewater treatment plant design was not approved by the Department of Health by the established deadline of July 24, 2021. EPA issued a civil penalty for failure to meet this major milestone in the LCC closure agreement.

LCCs were banned under the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act in April 2005. Cesspools collect and discharge untreated raw sewage into the ground, where disease-causing pathogens and harmful chemicals can contaminate groundwater, streams, and the ocean.
 

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: Clean Water Act, coronavirus, COVID-19, enforcement, EPA Enforcement Roundup, FIFRA, fines, hazardous waste management, penalties, RCRA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.

Amanda Oswald

Shipping Professional

Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!

Oscar Fisher

EHS Manager

Excellent class, super instructor, very easy to follow. No rushing through material. Would like to take his class again.

Lawrence Patterson

EH&S Facility Maintenance & Security Manager

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

Very good. I have always appreciated the way Lion Tech develops, presents and provides training and materials.

John Troy

Environmental Specialist

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.