EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 11/29
The EPA enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why the Agency assesses civil penalties for environmental noncompliance. All violations mentioned are alleged unless we indicate otherwise.
We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy.
WHO: A cement processing facility
According to EPA, an Iowa cement manufacturer is a “major air emission source” that failed to comply with State and Federal regulations intended to limit harmful releases of air pollution. EPA reviewed facility records for 2019 and 2020 and found that the company allegedly exceeded Clean Air Act emissions limits, failed to submit required reports to the state, and failed to conduct required testing of equipment.
WHERE: Mason City, IA
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $197,500
Under the terms of the settlement with EPA, the company agreed to conduct additional air emissions testing to demonstrate ongoing compliance with the Clean Air Act. Cement plants are the third largest industrial source of air pollution, emitting more than 500,000 tons per year of pollutants, including particulate matter.
WHO: A plating chemicals manufacturer
EPA reached an agreement with a company that makes plating chemicals for the semiconductor industry over alleged hazardous waste violations. During an inspection of the facility, EPA identified several RCRA violations, including the failure to make a hazardous waste determination on some of its waste chemicals, failure to properly label hazardous waste containers, and failure to provide adequate aisle space in the facility's hazardous waste storage area for employees and emergency personnel.
WHERE: West Haven, CT
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $86,769
As a result of EPA's enforcement action, the company corrected the violations and established new compliance procedures, including new procedures to ensure that the facility's hazardous wastes are properly identified and handled. The company also permanently closed and removed a 500-gallon underground hazardous waste storage tank from the facility.
WHO: A pesticide applicator and distributor
In November 2016, environmental inspectors investigated possible links between the use of a fumigant at an almond farm and reported public health effects consistent with pesticidal exposure. EPA determined that the company that applied the fumigant misused it by not following all requirements on the product label. According to EPA, the company did not comply with the label’s soil surface compacting requirement, its site‑specific Fumigation Management Plan was missing numerous required elements, and its Post-Application Summary was inaccurate.
WHERE: Gilroy, CA
WHAT: FIFRA violations
HOW MUCH: $44,275
The fumigant used is a restricted-use pesticide intended to treat and manage soil‑borne disease, including wireworms and nematodes. The active ingredient is chloropicrin, an irritant with characteristics of tear gas. Restricted-use pesticides are not available for use by the public because of high toxicity, the potential to injure applicators and bystanders, and the risk of adverse effects on the environment.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Find a Post
The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.
Material Release Agent
The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.
The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.
Hazmat Shipping Professional
The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!
Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!
Hazardous Waste Professional
Lion is easily and consistently the best option for compliance training. I've learned new information from every instructor I've had.
The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.
Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer
You blew the doors off the competition!
I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.
Amazing instructor; real-life examples. Lion training gets better every year!
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Some limited quantity reliefs are reserved for specific modes of transport. Use this guide to identify which reliefs you can capitalize on, and which do not apply to your operations.