Search

What Are Hazmat Packing Groups?

Posted on 10/11/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

Not all “hazardous materials” are equally hazardous. Most of the Hazard Classes and Divisions 1—9 cover a range of materials that, while they share a primary hazard, each have their own properties, ingredients, etc. For example: Some Class 8 corrosive materials present a very severe potential hazard (e.g., sulfuric acid), while others pose less severe risks (household cleaning products).

This is why hazmat "packing groups" are essential, and why being able to determine the PG for a material is a must-have skill to ensure shipments are properly classified, packaged, described on shipping papers, etc. to comply with the US DOT Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) and international standards (e.g., ICAO/IATA, IMDG Code). 

Definition of Packing Group (49 CFR 171.8)

The HMR defines packing group to mean "a grouping according to the degree of danger” for hazardous materials (49 CFR 171.8). Packing Group is commonly shortened to “PG,” including when used on hazmat shipping papers.  

A hazmat packing group (PG) has a twofold purpose: 1) To communicate the degree of danger and 2) to determine the strength of packaging required to contain the material in transportation. 

PG indicates the degree of danger for the material compared to others in the same class/division:  

  • PG I indicates great danger
  • PG II indicates medium danger
  • PG III indicates minor danger

The packing group of a hazardous material correlates to a packaging performance level (X, Y, or Z) for certified UN or DOT specification packagings, as follows: 

  • X-rated packagings are strong enough to hold PG I, PG II, or PG III materials.
  • Y-rated packagings may be used to ship PG II or PG III materials. Not PG I. 
  • Z-rated packagings may be used for PG III materials only 

Free Whitepaper: Lion’s 10 Step Hazmat Shipper Starter Guide 

Which Classes/Divisions Have Packing Groups?

Most of the 9 hazard classes and divisions of regulated hazardous materials use PG I, II, and III to communicate severity of hazard. The video below shows how PG is determined for each class or division, including the criteria used to assign materials to the appropriate group.

These hazard classes/divisions are divided into PG I, II, and III: 

  • Class 3—Flammable liquids
  • Division 4.1*, 4.2, and 4.3—Flammable/reactive solids 
  • Division 5.1—Oxidizers 
  • Division 6.1—Poisons
  • Class 8—Corrosives 
  • Class 9—Miscellaneous (Some materials only) 

*Except self-reactive materials in Division 4.1

What About Other Hazard Classes and Divisions?

What about the rest of the 9 hazard classes and divisions regulated in transportation? The other classes and divisions also cover many different hazardous materials that can vary greatly in the severity of the hazard they pose. 

For some hazard classes and divisions, three categories of severity—PG I, II and III—are not adequate to communicate the full range of hazards represented in the class or division. In other cases, three categories are more than are needed. 

Instead of using packing groups, these classes and divisions are separated into “categories,” “hazard zones,” or other groupings to denote severity of hazard: 

  • Divisions 1.1—1.6 (Explosives)*  
  • Division 2.3 (Poison Gases) 
  • Self-reactive materials in Division 4.1
  • Division 5.2 (Organic Peroxides) 
  • Division 6.2 (Infectious Substances) 
  • Class 9—Miscellaneous (Some materials only)  

*Explosives in Class 1 are divided into thirteen compatibility groups that represent the degree of danger as well and prevent certain explosives from being transported together or with other incompatible materials. 

Division 2.1 and 2.2 Gases 

Flammable gases (Division 2.1) and Non-flammable gases (2.2) are not grouped by severity of hazard. These gases are transported in UN-specification cylinders that are engineered, tested, and regularly certified to contain any type of gas inside. 

Class 7—Radioactive Materials 

Radioactive materials (Class 7), meanwhile, are classified according to detailed criteria that fill an entire subpart of the HMR. Considerations for classifying radioactive hazmat include the type of nuclides present (alpha, beta, etc.), the radionuclide number, whether the material is fissile or non-fissile, and more (49 CFR 173 Subpart I).

Watch the video below to find out how the “non-PG” hazard classes and divisions are split up according to degree of danger. 

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!

Oscar Fisher

EHS Manager

No comparison. Lion has the best RCRA training ever!!

Matt Sabine

Environmental Specialist

Lion provided an excellent introduction to environmental regulations, making the transition to a new career as an EHS specialist less daunting of a task. Drinking from a fire hose when the flow of water is lessened, is much more enjoyable!

Stephanie Weathers

SHE Specialist

Lion Technology workshops are amazing!! You always learn so much, and the instructors are fantastic.

Dorothy Rurak

Environmental Specialist

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Lion's training was by far the best online RCRA training I've ever taken. It was challenging and the layout was great!

Paul Harbison

Hazardous Waste Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Explore ten hazardous waste management errors that caused generators in California the most trouble last year.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.