Search

What Are Hazmat Packing Groups?

Posted on 10/11/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

Not all “hazardous materials” are equally hazardous. Most of the Hazard Classes and Divisions 1—9 cover a range of materials that, while they share a primary hazard, each have their own properties, ingredients, etc. For example: Some Class 8 corrosive materials present a very severe potential hazard (e.g., sulfuric acid), while others pose less severe risks (household cleaning products).

This is why hazmat "packing groups" are essential, and why being able to determine the PG for a material is a must-have skill to ensure shipments are properly classified, packaged, described on shipping papers, etc. to comply with the US DOT Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) and international standards (e.g., ICAO/IATA, IMDG Code). 

Definition of Packing Group (49 CFR 171.8)

The HMR defines packing group to mean "a grouping according to the degree of danger” for hazardous materials (49 CFR 171.8). Packing Group is commonly shortened to “PG,” including when used on hazmat shipping papers.  

A hazmat packing group (PG) has a twofold purpose: 1) To communicate the degree of danger and 2) to determine the strength of packaging required to contain the material in transportation. 

PG indicates the degree of danger for the material compared to others in the same class/division:  

  • PG I indicates great danger
  • PG II indicates medium danger
  • PG III indicates minor danger

The packing group of a hazardous material correlates to a packaging performance level (X, Y, or Z) for certified UN or DOT specification packagings, as follows: 

  • X-rated packagings are strong enough to hold PG I, PG II, or PG III materials.
  • Y-rated packagings may be used to ship PG II or PG III materials. Not PG I. 
  • Z-rated packagings may be used for PG III materials only 

Free Whitepaper: Lion’s 10 Step Hazmat Shipper Starter Guide 

Which Classes/Divisions Have Packing Groups?

Most of the 9 hazard classes and divisions of regulated hazardous materials use PG I, II, and III to communicate severity of hazard. The video below shows how PG is determined for each class or division, including the criteria used to assign materials to the appropriate group.

These hazard classes/divisions are divided into PG I, II, and III: 

  • Class 3—Flammable liquids
  • Division 4.1*, 4.2, and 4.3—Flammable/reactive solids 
  • Division 5.1—Oxidizers 
  • Division 6.1—Poisons
  • Class 8—Corrosives 
  • Class 9—Miscellaneous (Some materials only) 

*Except self-reactive materials in Division 4.1

What About Other Hazard Classes and Divisions?

What about the rest of the 9 hazard classes and divisions regulated in transportation? The other classes and divisions also cover many different hazardous materials that can vary greatly in the severity of the hazard they pose. 

For some hazard classes and divisions, three categories of severity—PG I, II and III—are not adequate to communicate the full range of hazards represented in the class or division. In other cases, three categories are more than are needed. 

Instead of using packing groups, these classes and divisions are separated into “categories,” “hazard zones,” or other groupings to denote severity of hazard: 

  • Divisions 1.1—1.6 (Explosives)*  
  • Division 2.3 (Poison Gases) 
  • Self-reactive materials in Division 4.1
  • Division 5.2 (Organic Peroxides) 
  • Division 6.2 (Infectious Substances) 
  • Class 9—Miscellaneous (Some materials only)  

*Explosives in Class 1 are divided into thirteen compatibility groups that represent the degree of danger as well and prevent certain explosives from being transported together or with other incompatible materials. 

Division 2.1 and 2.2 Gases 

Flammable gases (Division 2.1) and Non-flammable gases (2.2) are not grouped by severity of hazard. These gases are transported in UN-specification cylinders that are engineered, tested, and regularly certified to contain any type of gas inside. 

Class 7—Radioactive Materials 

Radioactive materials (Class 7), meanwhile, are classified according to detailed criteria that fill an entire subpart of the HMR. Considerations for classifying radioactive hazmat include the type of nuclides present (alpha, beta, etc.), the radionuclide number, whether the material is fissile or non-fissile, and more (49 CFR 173 Subpart I).

Watch the video below to find out how the “non-PG” hazard classes and divisions are split up according to degree of danger. 

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

Lion's training was by far the best online RCRA training I've ever taken. It was challenging and the layout was great!

Paul Harbison

Hazardous Waste Professional

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

I like the consistency of Lion workshops. The materials are well put together and instructors are top notch!

Kevin Pylka

Permitting, Compliance & Environmental Manager

Very good. I have always appreciated the way Lion Tech develops, presents and provides training and materials.

John Troy

Environmental Specialist

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.

Marc Bugg

Hazardous Waste Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Tips to identify and manage universal waste under more-stringent state regulations for generators and universal waste handlers in California.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.