Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 10/25

Posted on 10/25/2021 by Lauren Scott

Industrial facilities in the United States are subject to complex, overlapping environmental regulations concerning air emissions, discharges to water, hazardous waste management and disposal, oil spills, chemical management, and more. Failure to comply with all applicable US EPA requirements can result in future liability and civil penalties as high as $100,000+ per day, per violation (and growing every year).

The EPA enforcement actions highlighted below provide insight into how and why the Agency assesses civil penalties for environmental noncompliance. All violations mentioned are alleged unless we indicate otherwise.

We withhold the names of organizations and individuals subject to enforcement to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A chemical manufacturer
WHERE: Six locations in TX and IA
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $3.4 million

An international chemical manufacturer agreed to implement $50 million in upgrades and compliance measures at five company facilities in Texas and one in Iowa. The upgrades are expected to eliminate thousands of tons of air pollution and help bring the facilities into compliance with Federal and State air pollution control regulations.

According to EPA, the facilities failed to properly operate and monitor industrial flares, which resulted in excess emissions of harmful air pollution. The company also allegedly failed to comply with other key operating constraints to ensure the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants contained in the gases routed to the flares are effectively combusted.
 

WHO: A specialty pest services firm
WHERE: Tacoma, WA
WHAT: RCRA and FIFRA violations
HOW MUCH: $214,407

In March 2019, a local fire department responded to a fire at a chemical facility related to alleged mismanagement of 177.5 pounds of partially spent pesticide. According to EPA, the pesticide reacted with water in the air to produce hydrogen phosphide gas, or phosphine, which spontaneously ignited. As a result, one person working nearby was taken to the hospital due to phosphine poisoning.

The company has since closed the facility where the incident occurred and agreed to pay $180,000 for RCRA violations and $34,407 to resolve FIFRA violations. RCRA violations include receiving dangerous waste from off-site generators without a permit and storing and/or treating dangerous waste without a permit. The company allegedly violated FIFRA by disregarding the requirements of the pesticide’s label.
 

WHO: A hazardous waste treatment facility
WHERE: San Jose, CA
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $25,000

EPA reached a settlement with a hazardous waste facility for improper management of hazardous waste. EPA conducted an inspection in 2019 and found that the facility violated its State hazardous waste permit by allegedly failing to replace metal tags on equipment used to transfer hazardous waste. These tags are required to help identify equipment regulated under RCRA provisions.

In addition, the company allegedly failed to separate containers of incompatible hazardous waste during storage, which can lead to employee injuries or a release to the environment through fire or explosion.
 
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, fines, hazardous waste management, penalties, RCRA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.

Jim Jani

Environmental Coordinator

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

I have attended other training providers, but Lion is best. Lion is king of the hazmat jungle!!!

Henry Watkins

Hazardous Waste Technician

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

I like the consistency of Lion workshops. The materials are well put together and instructors are top notch!

Kevin Pylka

Permitting, Compliance & Environmental Manager

Lion's training was by far the best online RCRA training I've ever taken. It was challenging and the layout was great!

Paul Harbison

Hazardous Waste Professional

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.

Teresa Arellanes

EHS Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Knowing why TSDFs reject loads of hazardous waste—and the exact steps to follow if it happens—can reduce your anxiety and uncertainty about rejection.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.