Search

Understanding Superfund Discovery and Remediation

Posted on 7/10/2013 by Anthony R. Cardno

On May 21, 2013, EPA announced the addition of 9 hazardous waste sites to the National Priorities List (NPL) and a proposal to add 9 more. This brings the total number of sites listed on the NPL to 1,685. According to EPA, 68% of those sites (1,145) have cleanup remedies in place.

So how does a site become a “Superfund site” and ultimately subject to remediation?

1. The site is discovered and EPA is notified. EPA discovers potential superfund sites through reports of releases of hazardous substances to the National Response Center required under 40 CFR 302. EPA may also learn of a potential superfund site through notices of releases in excess of permitted values, incidental observations by the public, and petitions by motivated citizens.

 

Shipping Lithium Batteries Banner

 

2. EPA conducts a preliminary assessment (PA), and a site inspection (SI) takes place. After discovering a potential cleanup site, the EPA sends a team to acquire and assess samples of contaminated air, water, soil, and other environmental media. The team also investigates pathways of chemical exposure and vulnerable target populations of citizens and natural habitat.

3. If warranted by the PA and SI, EPA will propose adding the site to the NPL. Using information garnered during the assessment and investigation, EPA ranks the site using its Hazard Ranking System. If a site scores highly, the Agency will propose adding it to the National Priorities List (NPL).

Bhopal Gas Tragedy

4. Provided public comment does not change EPA’s opinion of the site’s hazards and cleanup requirements, EPA adds the site to the NPL. After deciding to propose a site as a candidate for the NPL, the EPA will publish a public notice in the Federal Register. This is an opportunity for the candidate site, and the affected community, to comment on the EPA’s decision.

The addition of a site to the NPL does not automatically initiate a cleanup action. A site’s ranking may rise or fall as new sites are added, delaying or hastening the initiation of cleanup. The ultimate goal of the NPL is to make sites safe and clean using new technology, focusing on the worst problems at the worst sites first.

However, when a site is listed on the NPL, liability is automatically assigned to any “potentially responsible party.” Liability is determined after a site is added to the NPL. If EPA cannot identify responsible parties for the newly listed sites, EPA is required to investigate the full extent of the contamination before commencing cleanup activities at the site.

Where are the Superfund sites? EPA has a searchable map!

Learn which of the EPA’s major programs apply to your facility and your responsibilities for emergency preparedness and reporting of releases into the air, water, or land. The two-day Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop covers the core elements of the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, FIFRA, CERCLA (Superfund), and more!

 

Tags: CERCLA, EPA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor made the class enjoyable. He presented in a very knowledgeable, personable manner. Best class I've ever attended. Will take one again.

John Nekoloff

Environmental Compliance Manager

Amazing instructor; real-life examples. Lion training gets better every year!

Frank Papandrea

Environmental Manager

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

The instructor was great, explaining complex topics in terms that were easily understandable and answering questions clearly and thoroughly.

Brittany Holm

Lab Supervisor

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!

Amanda Walsh

Hazardous Waste Professional

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

Excellent class, super instructor, very easy to follow. No rushing through material. Would like to take his class again.

Lawrence Patterson

EH&S Facility Maintenance & Security Manager

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.