EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 6/29
Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.
Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
WHO: A retirement housing complex
A housing complex for the elderly in Omao has agreed to close 16 pollution-causing large capacity cesspools (LCCs) as part an agreement with Federal environmental officials. During a 2019 investigation, EPA officials discovered 14 of those LCCs serviced seven multi-unit residential buildings and one serviced a recreation center building.
Under the EPA compliance order, the facility has agreed to close the cesspools by December 31, 2022. The owners of the housing complex have since announced plans to replace the LCCs with a state-approved wastewater treatment system.
WHO: A farming company
EPA has cited a farm in Delaware for allegedly failing to comply with FIFRA’s agriculture Worker Protection Standard after allegedly failing to provide decontamination supplies to employees who worked in pesticide-treated areas, among other violations.
As part of the agreement, the farm does not admit liability for the alleged violations but has since certified compliance with the worker protection requirements.
WHO: A powder coating manufacturer
During a May 2019 inspection at a custom and industrial metal coating manufacturing facility, EPA found the facility allegedly failed to perform required hazardous waste determinations and failed to comply with hazardous waste generation and handling requirements.
In response to the inspection findings, the facility took the necessary steps to return to compliance. To settle the alleged violations, the company also agreed to pay a civil penalty of $19,000.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
WHO: A retirement housing complex
WHERE: Omao, HI
WHAT: Safe Drinking Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $55,182
A housing complex for the elderly in Omao has agreed to close 16 pollution-causing large capacity cesspools (LCCs) as part an agreement with Federal environmental officials. During a 2019 investigation, EPA officials discovered 14 of those LCCs serviced seven multi-unit residential buildings and one serviced a recreation center building.Under the EPA compliance order, the facility has agreed to close the cesspools by December 31, 2022. The owners of the housing complex have since announced plans to replace the LCCs with a state-approved wastewater treatment system.
WHO: A farming company
WHERE: Laurel, DE
WHAT: FIFRA violations
HOW MUCH: $25,000
EPA has cited a farm in Delaware for allegedly failing to comply with FIFRA’s agriculture Worker Protection Standard after allegedly failing to provide decontamination supplies to employees who worked in pesticide-treated areas, among other violations.As part of the agreement, the farm does not admit liability for the alleged violations but has since certified compliance with the worker protection requirements.
WHO: A powder coating manufacturer
WHERE: Cedar Rapids, IA
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $19,000
During a May 2019 inspection at a custom and industrial metal coating manufacturing facility, EPA found the facility allegedly failed to perform required hazardous waste determinations and failed to comply with hazardous waste generation and handling requirements.In response to the inspection findings, the facility took the necessary steps to return to compliance. To settle the alleged violations, the company also agreed to pay a civil penalty of $19,000.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Tags: Clean Water Act, Delaware, environmental enforcement, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, FIFRA, hawaii, Iowa, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Find out what makes DOT hazmat training mandatory for employees who sign the hazardous waste manifest, a “dually regulated” document for tracking shipments.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.