Lion will be closed on Monday, February 16, 2026. Online training support is available via support@lion.com.
Search

Safe Drinking Water Act: Two Kinds of Water Quality Standards

Posted on 3/13/2012 by James Griffin

Q. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Environmental Protection Agency establishes quality standards for public water supply systems. The EPA sets two kinds of standards: “Primary” and “Secondary.” What’s the difference?
 
Primary Water Quality Standards
Primary Standards are health-based, and the EPA sets Primary Standards for contaminants that threaten public health. For each contaminant, a Primary Standard either specifies a treatment technique or sets a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and leaves it up to the public water system to figure out a way to purify the water below that level [40 CFR 141].
 
Secondary Water Quality Standards
Secondary Standards are aesthetic, not health-based. The EPA sets Secondary Standards for contaminants that do not present a health hazard but may make water unpleasant to drink [40 CFR 143].
 
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Enforcement
While the U.S. EPA sets Water Quality Standards, the standards are enforced by both the U.S. EPA and at the State level.
Every public water system must consistently monitor and sample its water supply for contaminants. While the EPA does not require monitoring for secondary contaminants (considering them non-enforceable recommendations), the Agency does recommend monitoring for secondary contaminants on the same schedule as primary inorganic contaminants [40 CFR 143.4]. State regulators may enforce secondary standards and require water systems to monitor and sample for secondary contaminants.
 
Notices of Violation
When a public water system violates a Primary Standard, by exceeding the authorized maximum contaminant level, it must notify its customers. The notification must contain:
 
  • Clear and readily understandable explanations of the violations,
  • The potential health effects,
  • What steps the water system is taking to correct the violation, and
  • Precautions customers should take until the violation is corrected and the water is again safe (“boil water” notifications, etc.)
When a public water system violates a Secondary Standard, the EPA (with one exception) does not require a notification, but State regulators may require one. The one exception is “fluorine.” When a water system violates the Secondary Standard for fluorine without violating the primary standard, it must notify its customers [40 CFR 141, Subpart Q].
 
More Information
The EPA publishes an annual summary of Health Advisories and Drinking Water Quality Standards and provides many guidance documents for regulated entities on its Web site.
 

Tags: EPA, reporting and recordkeeping, Safe Drinking Water Act

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.

John Hutchinson

Senior EHS Engineer

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.

George Alva

Manufacturing Manager

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.