Lion's office will be closed on Friday, July 4, in observance of Independence Day. For help with online training, please contact support@lion.com.
Search

EPA Goes Back-to-Basics on NAAQS Reviews

Posted on 5/11/2018 by Roger Marks

power_plant_cleanpowerplan.gifCurrent US EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on May 9th signed a memorandum establishing a “back-to-basics” approach to Clean Air Act-required reviews of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

The memo, inspired by an April 12 Presidential memorandum to EPA, lays out five principles to guide EPA’s decision making pursuant to these air quality standards.


What Are NAAQS?

Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to set maximum allowable levels for six criteria pollutants in the ambient air: ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, lead, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. In areas where the pollution level rises above the NAAQS, facilities face more stringent requirements for building or modifying sources of air pollution.

The Clean Air Act also requires EPA to review these NAAQS levels every five years and adjust them, if necessary. Each time US EPA updates its NAAQs requirements for a given pollutant—as the Agency did for ozone on October 1, 2015—the update triggers a reassessment of regional attainment status. States must determine which regions attain the updated standard and which don’t and submit the data to US EPA.

EPA must complete the area designations within two years once the Agency updates any NAAQS.


5 Principles for Back-to-Basics NAAQS Reviews

The NAAQS memo lists five back-to-basics principles for EPA to follow to improve the NAAQS review process.
 
  1. Meet Statutory Deadlines. EPA will look for efficiencies to expediate the review process, which often drags on past the time limits mandated by law. EPA was sued in March 2018 for failure to complete area designations for its lowered ozone NAAQS, for example.

  2. Address All CAA Provisions for NAAQS Reviews. EPA specifically calls attention to Section 109(d)(2), which outlines the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Council’s role for providing advice and feedback on NAAQS standards. Pruitt’s memo states that EPA has not always met its full responsibilities under this section in previous NAAQS reviews.

  3. Streamline and Standardize the Process for Development and Review of Key Policy-relevant Information. EPA plans to improve its review of “policy-relevant science,” studies, and analyses “that address key questions related to the adequacy of primary and secondary NAAQS.”

  4. Differentiate Science and Policy Considerations in NAAQS Review Process. EPA wants to better distinguish between “science advice” and “policy advice” received from advisors and more clearly separate the pure science from the additional considerations—social, economic, etc.—that the Administrator considers before approving any NAAQS action.

  5. Issue Timely Implementation Regulations and Guidance. EPA pledges to do a better job of releasing guidance and information pursuant to changing NAAQS rules to the regulated community and State agencies.
Read the whole memo here.


Clean Air Act Online Trainingair-pollution.jpg

Are you responsible for Clean Air Act compliance? New to EPA regulations or need to identify the air programs that impact your facility? The Clean Air Act Regulations Online Course will guide you through the complex details and requirements of each Clean Air Act program, preparing you to achieve and maintain compliance, and avoid EPA fines now up to $95K per day, per violation.
 

Tags: back, basics, Clean Air Act, EPA, NAAQS, new rules, to

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

These are the best classes I attend each year. I always take something away and implement improvements at my sites.

Kim Racine

EH&S Manager

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

The instructor does a great job at presenting material in an approachable way. I have been able to save my company about $30,000 in the last year with what I have learned from Lion!

Curtis Ahonen

EHS&S Manager

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Spot and correct 4 of the most common universal waste errors before they result in a notice of violation during a Federal or state inspection.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.