Lion.com will be offline for scheduled maintenance on Wednesday, August 19, for about 30 minutes starting at 5:30 PM ET. 
Search

EPA Goes Back-to-Basics on NAAQS Reviews

Posted on 5/11/2018 by Roger Marks

power_plant_cleanpowerplan.gifCurrent US EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on May 9th signed a memorandum establishing a “back-to-basics” approach to Clean Air Act-required reviews of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

The memo, inspired by an April 12 Presidential memorandum to EPA, lays out five principles to guide EPA’s decision making pursuant to these air quality standards.


What Are NAAQS?

Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to set maximum allowable levels for six criteria pollutants in the ambient air: ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, lead, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. In areas where the pollution level rises above the NAAQS, facilities face more stringent requirements for building or modifying sources of air pollution.

The Clean Air Act also requires EPA to review these NAAQS levels every five years and adjust them, if necessary. Each time US EPA updates its NAAQs requirements for a given pollutant—as the Agency did for ozone on October 1, 2015—the update triggers a reassessment of regional attainment status. States must determine which regions attain the updated standard and which don’t and submit the data to US EPA.

EPA must complete the area designations within two years once the Agency updates any NAAQS.


5 Principles for Back-to-Basics NAAQS Reviews

The NAAQS memo lists five back-to-basics principles for EPA to follow to improve the NAAQS review process.
 
  1. Meet Statutory Deadlines. EPA will look for efficiencies to expediate the review process, which often drags on past the time limits mandated by law. EPA was sued in March 2018 for failure to complete area designations for its lowered ozone NAAQS, for example.

  2. Address All CAA Provisions for NAAQS Reviews. EPA specifically calls attention to Section 109(d)(2), which outlines the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Council’s role for providing advice and feedback on NAAQS standards. Pruitt’s memo states that EPA has not always met its full responsibilities under this section in previous NAAQS reviews.

  3. Streamline and Standardize the Process for Development and Review of Key Policy-relevant Information. EPA plans to improve its review of “policy-relevant science,” studies, and analyses “that address key questions related to the adequacy of primary and secondary NAAQS.”

  4. Differentiate Science and Policy Considerations in NAAQS Review Process. EPA wants to better distinguish between “science advice” and “policy advice” received from advisors and more clearly separate the pure science from the additional considerations—social, economic, etc.—that the Administrator considers before approving any NAAQS action.

  5. Issue Timely Implementation Regulations and Guidance. EPA pledges to do a better job of releasing guidance and information pursuant to changing NAAQS rules to the regulated community and State agencies.
Read the whole memo here.


Clean Air Act Online Trainingair-pollution.jpg

Are you responsible for Clean Air Act compliance? New to EPA regulations or need to identify the air programs that impact your facility? The Clean Air Act Regulations Online Course will guide you through the complex details and requirements of each Clean Air Act program, preparing you to achieve and maintain compliance, and avoid EPA fines now up to $95K per day, per violation.
 

Tags: back, basics, Clean Air Act, EPA, NAAQS, new rules, to

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.

Sharon Ziemek

EHS Manager

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

Best instructor ever! I was going to take my DOT training w/a different provider, but based on this presentation, I will also be doing my DOT training w/Lion!

Donna Moot

Hazardous Waste Professional

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!

Marti Severs

Enterprise Safety Manager

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Explore ten hazardous waste management errors that caused generators in California the most trouble last year.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.