Search

How Do EPA Water Quality Standards Affect Your Business?

Posted on 10/11/2016 by Roger Marks

To protect public drinking water supplies, recreation, and fish and wildlife, the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish water quality standards (WQS) for waters of the United States where appropriate and attainable.
 
Not all bodies of water are the same, of course, so EPA must consider a number of factors to determine what constitutes “acceptable” water quality in a given situation. Different habitats—lakes, ponds, rivers, streams, and wetlands—behave differently. Most waters of the United States are freshwater habitats, but some are saltwater and others are brackish (where salt- and fresh-water bodies intermingle).

EPA also considers how the water is used: What’s acceptable water quality for the local fish and wildlife population may not be acceptable for recreation or public drinking water supplies. Variables like these make establishing a single set of requirements for every water of the United States, at the very least, impractical.

So how does EPA meet the Clean Water Act mandate to establish WQS?

EPA Water Quality Standards


EPA Delegates Water Quality to the States

EPA delegates the responsibility to establish WQS to the individual states. Each state is required to establish, review, and revise (when necessary) WQS for any waters of the United States within its boundaries. EPA then reviews and approves or disapproves each state’s WQS.

Water Quality Standards consist of:
  • Designated uses,
  • Numeric and/or narrative criteria for each use, and
  • An anti-degradation policy.
Once approved, the WQS are promulgated and enforced by the issuing state. If a state has not established WQS, or if EPA does not approve of the state’s standards, then the EPA’s national standards at 40 CFR 131, Subpart D apply in that state. See the 40 CFR 131, Subpart D WQS here.  
 

What Are Designated Uses?

The state adopts WQS for individual water bodies by first designating what uses the water might be put to. Such uses may include, but are not limited to:
  • Aquatic life support
  • Fish consumption
  • Shellfish harvesting
  • Drinking water supply
  • Swimming
Since the goal of the Clean Water Act is to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters,” the state will need to base its water quality standards on how well the body of water supports the assigned uses. Once the uses are identified, the state determines whether the water can support that use. This determination can range from “Fully Supporting” to “Not Attainable.”


Numeric and Narrative Water Quality Criteria

The criteria established by the state in the WQS for each body of water can be numeric, narrative, or both.

Numeric criteria are measurable physical, chemical, or biological limits based on accepted science and health data. For instance, numeric criteria can be a limit of < 3.2 ppb for lead contamination or a minimum dissolved oxygen level of 9.5 mg/L.

Narrative criteria define, rather than quantify, conditions and attainable goals. For instance, narrative criteria can be not allowing the discharge of toxic pollutants in concentrations that may affect public health or the natural aquatic environment.


What Is an Antidegradation Policy or Anti-Backsliding?

The state must also adopt an antidegradation policy to protect and maintain existing uses. “Antidegradation” is not defined in the regulations, but it is broadly interpreted as not allowing water quality to worsen to a less usable level, no matter the future economic or social development in the area around the water body. [40 CFR 131.12]


How Has EPA’s Waters of the US Definition Changed Over Time?

If you follow EPA water regulations, you may remember that in 2015, US EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACoE) announced a rulemaking to expand on the definition of “Waters of the United States.” The updated definition would put more bodies of water under the scope of EPA’s Clean Water Act, including water quality standards. Read about the updated definition of “Waters of the United States” here.  

The rule took effect in August 2015, but after facing legal challenges by affected industry groups, the new definition of “Waters of the United States” was stayed nationwide by a US Court of Appeals. This stay has delayed enforcement of the updated rules until the legal challenges are settled.

How Do EPA Water Quality Standards Affect Businesses?

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limits, including Stormwater Discharge permit limits (40 CFR 122), National Pre-Treatment Program limits for discharging into Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) (40 CFR 403), state-level non-point source controls, and other rules or regulatory programs are designed with the intent of meeting these water quality standards. Over time, effluent limits and controls may become more or less stringent if the quality of water in the body being discharged into improves or deteriorates.

Get a Clear Picture of Your Environmental Responsibilities

At the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop, collaborate and learn alongside other EHS managers from your area to identify the EPA rules that affect your job.

Get a clear view of how the thousands of pages of environmental restrictions and requirements come together to regulate your site. From permitting and pollution control under the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts and chemical management under TSCA, EPCRA, and CERCLA, to the basics of hazardous waste management under RCRA and much more, this expert-led workshop will help you make decisions that put your environmental team in a position to succeed.

The 2017 schedule is available now and includes a workshop in our new Environmental Training Center in Sparta, NJ! Register to receive a full year of Lion Membership for complete on-the-job compliance support. 

Tags: Act, Clean, EPA, NPDES, Water, Water Quality Standards

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!

Amanda Walsh

Hazardous Waste Professional

I had a positive experience utilizing this educational program. It was very informative, convenient, and rewarding from a career perspective.

John Gratacos

Logistics Manager

One of the best trainings I have ever received!

Brandon Morfin

EH&S Manager

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

The instructor created a great learning environment.

Avinash Thummadi

CAD & Environmental Manager

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Decrease spill, release, and injury risk and increase savings with these "source reduction" strategies to prevent unused chemicals from becoming regulated as hazardous waste.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.