Search

Are Generic and N.O.S. Hazmat Names the Same Thing?

Posted on 8/27/2018 by Philip "Flip" De Rea

The US DOT’s Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) require shippers to identify all hazardous materials using a proper shipping name (PSN) from column (2) of the 49 CFR 172.101 table.
Shippers must choose a PSN that:
 
  • Appears on the 172.101 Hazmat Table.
  • Accurately describes the material being shipped, and
  • Is the most specific name available.
Selecting the right PSN is one of the most important steps in the shipping process: The name assigned to your material provides accurate and specific information about the material and its hazards to First Responders, supply chain personnel, or anyone else who encounters your shipment in transport. Choosing an incorrect PSN can cause further mistakes in how the material is packaged, marked, labeled, handled, and segregated—and even impact emergency response in a worst-case scenario.
Naming_the_Material.jpg
Get up to speed on new and changing hazmat rules when the DOT Hazmat Ground Shipper Workshop comes to Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, Baton Rouge, Denver, Phoenix, San Francisco, San Diego, Las Vegas, Seattle, and more in Fall 2018.  

Reserve your seat now.


While the 172.101 Hazmat Table lists about three-thousand hazmat shipping names, it does not cover every possible hazardous material. So, what do shippers do when a specific name for their material cannot be found on the table? The DOT provides two tools to use to solve this problem; the placement of the letters “n.o.s.” at the end of a PSN, and the designation of certain PSNs as “generic.”

Because these two Proper Shipping Name designations often overlap, a common misconception in the shipping industry is that all PSNs ending with “n.o.s.” are “generic,” and vice versa. This is not the case!

The “n.o.s.” and “generic” designations are in fact distinct from each other and have different implications for hazmat transport safety.  


How & When to Use an N.O.S. PSN

Shippers may use Proper Shipping Names (PSN) that end in the abbreviation “n.o.s.”—short for “not otherwise specified”— to identify a hazardous material that is not specifically listed by name in the Hazmat Table at 49 CFR 172.101. N.O.S. shipping names cover groups of similar chemicals, materials with particular end-uses, and hazard class names.

Some examples of n.o.s. entries are:
 
  • Flammable solid, toxic, inorganic n.o.s.
  • Ketones, liquid n.o.s.
  • Medicine, liquid, toxic n.o.s.
  • Nitriles, inorganic, aqueous solution n.o.s.
The abbreviation “n.o.s.” located at the end of a PSN it is a tool used in the “identification” step to help shippers choose the best, most accurate PSN to identify their material.

For example:

Your Hazard Class 3, PG II material is accurately described by BOTH the PSN “Acetone” and the PSN “Ketones, liquid, n.o.s.” So, which PSN should you use?

At 49 CFR 172.101(c)(12)(ii) the DOT advise us that, given a choice, an accurate PSN that does NOT end in “n.o.s.” is better than one that does. This makes Acetone the best choice for the PSN.

Similarly, given a choice between the PSN “Flammable liquids, n.o.s.” and the PSN “Compounds, cleaning liquid”; the better choice will be, and is, “Compounds, cleaning liquid.”

You can ship hazmat using an n.o.s. name only when no more specific and accurate option is available. When a non-n.o.s. shipping name is available, it is always a more descriptive and accurate option—and therefore the right choice for HMR compliance.
 

When &  How to Use a “Generic” (G) PSN

A “generic” PSN is indicated by the presence of a “G” (for Generic) in column (1) of the 172.101 table, like “Fluorosilicates, n.o.s.” in the image below.

172101-table.JPG

Other examples of generic PSNs are:
 
  • Compounds, cleaning liquid
  • Ketones, liquid n.o.s.adding_chemical_name_poison_label.jpg
  • Metal catalyst, dry
  • Nitriles, inorganic, aqueous solution n.o.s.
When a PSN is designated as “generic” it means that the PSN, as listed, is too vague for use in transport.

When you (the shipper) use a generic PSN to mark packages and complete shipping papers, you must add technical name(s) (in parenthesis) to identify the source of the hazard. For example:
 
  • Corrosive liquid n.o.s (Sodium Carbonate, Potassium Carbonate)
  • Dyes, solid, toxic n.o.s. (Methyl Orange)
  • Pesticides, liquid, flammable, toxic (Acetone, 4-Nitrophenol)


G vs. N.O.S.: What's The Difference?

The extremely high co-occurrence between generic (G) PSNs and PSNs that end in “n.o.s.” is what causes confusion here. “Ketones, liquid n.o.s.” for example, or “Fluorosilicates, n.o.s.” are both generic shipping names that also end in n.o.s. This frequent overlap gives the impression that “generic” and “n.o.s.” are synonymous, but really it’s just an overlap; a common co-occurrence. Some generic (G) shipping names do not end in n.o.s., and some n.o.s. shipping names are not generic.

While shipping names that end in n.o.s. cover multiple materials with the same hazard class, chemical family, or use-group; those n.o.s. names do not necessarily require the addition of more information—only a “G” in column (1) of the 172.101 table tells you that.

If and only if your n.o.s. name is also “generic”—i.e. there is a “G” in Column 1--will you need to supplement it with technical names on your package markings or shipping papers.  

So, even though a “G” often appears in column (1) for a PSN that ends in “n.o.s.”, they are distinct pieces of advice and are used by hazmat handlers at different points in the shipping process. By understanding the difference between these two similar tools, you are better prepared to select the right shipping name for any material—and keep your shipments in full compliance.  


DOT, IATA, & IMDG Hazmat Shipper Training

Get more from your training budget and be confident you know what it takes to keep hazmat shipments in full compliance with the latest 49 CFR, IATA, and IMDG requirements. The Complete Multimodal Hazmat Shipper Certification program comes to Houston, Dallas, San Francisco, San Diego, Seattle, Kansas City, Detroit, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, and Chicago before the end of 2018.

Over four days of collaborative, interactive live training, this course guides you through a step-by-step process to properly identify and prepare hazmat for transport by highway, air, or vessel. Reserve your seat now.
 
 

Tags: DOT, hazardous materials,, hazmat shipping, PHMSA, proper shipping names

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

Amazing instructor; real-life examples. Lion training gets better every year!

Frank Papandrea

Environmental Manager

As always, Lion never disappoints

Paul Resley

Environmental Coordinator

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

This is a very informative training compared to others. It covers everything I expect to learn and even a lot of new things.

Quatama Jackson

Waste Management Professional

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Look beyond the annual "Top 10 List" to see specifics about the most cited OSHA health & safety Standards and the individual regulations that tripped up employers the most last year. 

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.