Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 8/2

Posted on 8/2/2021 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A beauty products manufacturer
WHERE: Danville, IL
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $175,000

A company that specializes in the production of personal care products agreed to a six-figure settlement to resolve alleged hazardous waste air emissions violations. EPA alleges the company failed to monitor valves and pumps for leaks, maintain records, tag valves and flanges, inspect roof closures, and obtain a written tank assessment.

Due its proximity to a Superfund site and low-income communities, environmental justice played a significant role in EPA’s actions on this case.
 

WHO: A pharmaceutical facility
WHERE: Oelwein, IA
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $80,562

EPA reached a settlement with a blood anticoagulant manufacturer for failing to meet applicable organic air emission as well as other RCRA requirements. The company was seemingly operating as an unpermitted large quantity generator, according to EPA. The alleged violations created the potential for releases of hazardous wastes, including harmful air emissions.

A 2020 inspection found the company was allegedly operating as a large quantity generator that failed to have a contingency plan for releases of hazardous waste, conduct and document hazardous waste training, and properly mark equipment and keep records. In response to the inspection findings, the company agreed to take the necessary steps to return its facility to compliance.
 

WHO: A construction company
WHERE: Lincoln, NE
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $60,009

As a result of a 2019 inspection, EPA alleges a construction company violated the terms of its Clean Water Act permit. Since alerted to the alleged violations, the company took necessary steps to return to compliance and agreed to pay a civil penalty.

The company allegedly failed to implement practices to limit the release of construction pollution into streams and other waters. EPA says those failures resulted in discharges of sediment and construction-related pollutants into a tributary to Stevens Creek and Waterford Lake.
 

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Complete Environmental Regulations
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: Clean Water Act, enforcement, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, fines, hazardous waste management, penalties, RCRA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion Technology workshops are amazing!! You always learn so much, and the instructors are fantastic.

Dorothy Rurak

Environmental Specialist

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.

George Alva

Manufacturing Manager

Very well structured, comprehensive, and comparable to live training seminars I've participated in previously. I will recommend the online course to other colleagues with training requirement needs.

Neil Luciano

EHS Manager

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

These are the best classes I attend each year. I always take something away and implement improvements at my sites.

Kim Racine

EH&S Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

The definitive 10-step guide for new hazardous materials shipping managers. Quickly reference the major considerations and details that impact hazmat shipping compliance.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.