Search

Combustible Dust Incident Under Investigation by US CSB

Posted on 8/14/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

The US Chemical Safety Board (CSB) is investigating the fatal explosions and fire that occurred July 29 at a facility in Fremont, Nebraska. A father and his two daughters were inside the facility and were fatally injured.

The facility produced animal bedding and wood fuel pellets for heating from wood waste. The local fire marshal’s office said the incident was caused by an accidental dust fire.

Combustible Dust Incident Under Investigation by US CSB

Dust as a Workplace Safety Hazard

OSHA’s Hazard Communication (HazCom) Standard defines combustible dust as “finely divided solid particulates of a substance or mixture that pose a flash-fire hazard or explosion hazard when dispersed in air or other oxidizing media.” [29 CFR 1910.1200]

Under the same Standard, combustible dust is also explicitly included in the definition of hazardous chemical: “Hazardous chemical means any chemical which is classified as a physical hazard or a health hazard, a simple asphyxiant, combustible dust, or hazard not otherwise classified.”

Dusts known to cause these hazards include metal dust, wood dust, coal and other carbon dusts, plastic dust and additives, biosolids, organic dust (sugar, flour, soap, dried blood, etc.), and certain textile materials.

This video shows what happened during a 2008 combustible dust explosion that killed 14 people and injured 38 others.


 
The US CSB identified 281 combustible dust incidents between 1980 and 2005 that led to the deaths of 119 workers, injured 718, and extensively damaged numerous industrial facilities. OSHA, Combustible Dust: An Explosion Hazard

What OSHA Regulations Apply to Combustible Dust?

While there is no specific OSHA standard for combustible dust, the Agency relies on multiple workplace health & safety requirements, as well as the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act, to cite violations.

If dust is found accumulated on surfaces or in material storage areas, for example, OSHA may cite the employer for housekeeping violations under the general industry standards for Walking-Working Surfaces (§1910.22(a)(1)–(2)) or Materials Handling and Storage (§1910.176(c)).

OSHA may also cite an employer for noncompliance with workplace ventilation standards in §1910.94, personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements in §1910.132, or hazard communication information and training requirements in §1910.1200 for hazardous chemicals, among others.

Combustible Dust and the OSH Act General Duty Clause

The General Duty Clause of the OSH Act (Section 5(a)(1)) requires employers to provide a workplace for employees that is free of recognized hazards that can cause serious injury or illness. In its 2023 combustible dust directive for enforcement personnel, OSHA lists scenarios that could result in a citation for a violation of the General Duty Clause related to combustible dust. 

The following are examples of workplace conditions for which a general duty clause citation (see Appendix C for sample citations) may be issued:

  • Problems related to dust collectors, e.g., dust collection equipment located inside the building (however, there are some exceptions) and dust collectors returning air back inside the building.

  • Ductwork-related problems, e.g., the ductwork not being grounded and ductwork not constructed of metal.

  • Improperly designed deflagration venting (venting to areas where employees are likely to be exposed to explosion/deflagration hazards).

  • Processing and material handling equipment, such as mixers, blenders, pulverizers, mills, dryers, ovens, filters, dust collectors, pneumatic conveyors, and screw conveyors, that are not protected by deflagration suppression systems.

  • Blowers, collection systems, and exhaust systems used at sawmills that are not designed, constructed, or maintained properly.

Tags: combustible dust, CSB, osha

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.

Jim Jani

Environmental Coordinator

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.

Marc Bugg

Hazardous Waste Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

A guide to developing standard operating procedures, or SOPs, that help you select, manage, and audit your hazmat agents and contractors.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.