Search

Combustible Dust Incident Under Investigation by US CSB

Posted on 8/14/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

The US Chemical Safety Board (CSB) is investigating the fatal explosions and fire that occurred July 29 at a facility in Fremont, Nebraska. A father and his two daughters were inside the facility and were fatally injured.

The facility produced animal bedding and wood fuel pellets for heating from wood waste. The local fire marshal’s office said the incident was caused by an accidental dust fire.

Combustible Dust Incident Under Investigation by US CSB

Dust as a Workplace Safety Hazard

OSHA’s Hazard Communication (HazCom) Standard defines combustible dust as “finely divided solid particulates of a substance or mixture that pose a flash-fire hazard or explosion hazard when dispersed in air or other oxidizing media.” [29 CFR 1910.1200]

Under the same Standard, combustible dust is also explicitly included in the definition of hazardous chemical: “Hazardous chemical means any chemical which is classified as a physical hazard or a health hazard, a simple asphyxiant, combustible dust, or hazard not otherwise classified.”

Dusts known to cause these hazards include metal dust, wood dust, coal and other carbon dusts, plastic dust and additives, biosolids, organic dust (sugar, flour, soap, dried blood, etc.), and certain textile materials.

This video shows what happened during a 2008 combustible dust explosion that killed 14 people and injured 38 others.


 
The US CSB identified 281 combustible dust incidents between 1980 and 2005 that led to the deaths of 119 workers, injured 718, and extensively damaged numerous industrial facilities. OSHA, Combustible Dust: An Explosion Hazard

What OSHA Regulations Apply to Combustible Dust?

While there is no specific OSHA standard for combustible dust, the Agency relies on multiple workplace health & safety requirements, as well as the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act, to cite violations.

If dust is found accumulated on surfaces or in material storage areas, for example, OSHA may cite the employer for housekeeping violations under the general industry standards for Walking-Working Surfaces (§1910.22(a)(1)–(2)) or Materials Handling and Storage (§1910.176(c)).

OSHA may also cite an employer for noncompliance with workplace ventilation standards in §1910.94, personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements in §1910.132, or hazard communication information and training requirements in §1910.1200 for hazardous chemicals, among others.

Combustible Dust and the OSH Act General Duty Clause

The General Duty Clause of the OSH Act (Section 5(a)(1)) requires employers to provide a workplace for employees that is free of recognized hazards that can cause serious injury or illness. In its 2023 combustible dust directive for enforcement personnel, OSHA lists scenarios that could result in a citation for a violation of the General Duty Clause related to combustible dust. 

The following are examples of workplace conditions for which a general duty clause citation (see Appendix C for sample citations) may be issued:

  • Problems related to dust collectors, e.g., dust collection equipment located inside the building (however, there are some exceptions) and dust collectors returning air back inside the building.

  • Ductwork-related problems, e.g., the ductwork not being grounded and ductwork not constructed of metal.

  • Improperly designed deflagration venting (venting to areas where employees are likely to be exposed to explosion/deflagration hazards).

  • Processing and material handling equipment, such as mixers, blenders, pulverizers, mills, dryers, ovens, filters, dust collectors, pneumatic conveyors, and screw conveyors, that are not protected by deflagration suppression systems.

  • Blowers, collection systems, and exhaust systems used at sawmills that are not designed, constructed, or maintained properly.

Tags: combustible dust, CSB, osha

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

I think LION does an excellent job of any training they do. Materials provided are very useful to my day-to-day work activities.

Pamela Embody

EHS Specialist

The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.

Teresa Arellanes

EHS Manager

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!

Marti Severs

Enterprise Safety Manager

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.

Jim Jani

Environmental Coordinator

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.