Search

Environmental Regulations Year in Review

Posted on 12/13/2011 by James Griffin

As the year comes to a close, we take a moment to look back and reflect on what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has done, and not done, over the past twelve months.
 
New and Amended Air Programs
The EPA had proposed to tighten the 2008 air quality standards for ground-level ozone ahead of schedule, but significant opposition from the regulated community and the White House led the Agency to withdraw the initiative.
 
The EPA also wrote new national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPS) for over a dozen industries, including: shipbuilding & wood furniture manufacture; primary lead processing; petroleum refineries; pharmaceuticals and printing; boilers; chemical manufacturing; gold mining; gasoline distribution; and amended the NESHAP for plating & polishing operations.
 
Although this was also the first year for large emitters to report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the EPA did delay the reporting deadline until September 30, 2011. As a complex and far-ranging new program, the reporting system for GHGs continues to develop.
 
New Water Rules
The Clean Water Act gives the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers authority over all “waters of the United States.” Over the past few years, a controversy has arisen over what waters and waterways are actually subject to regulation and NPDES permitting, and which are not. Several cases on this issue have reached the Supreme Court, and the last significant case (Rapanos v United States) resulted in a decision that didn’t quite explain which waters are or are not subject to regulation by the EPA. In an attempt to clear these muddied waters, the Agency and Corps published a draft in April explaining which waters they would and would not seek to regulate. There was a public comment period, but Lion Technology has heard little about this issue since, so it seems to lie dormant for now.
 
The EPA also completed another court-mandated rulemaking this fall. Over the past decade, several court cases have concluded that many pesticide applications would require NPDES permits under the Clean Water Act as well as pesticide permits under FIFRA. Because double-permitting what are generally routine activities is considered by some to be excessive, the EPA published a General Permit to manage the situation until Congress can amend the appropriate laws.
 
Another major water program the Agency worked on this year was yet another extension (until May 2013) for farms to complete their new oil spill prevention and countermeasure programs. After several years of extensions, all other facilities were finally subject to the new rules as of November 10 of this year.
 

Tags: Act, Air, Clean, Clean Water Act, EPA, new rules

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion's training was by far the best online RCRA training I've ever taken. It was challenging and the layout was great!

Paul Harbison

Hazardous Waste Professional

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

One of the best trainings I have ever received!

Brandon Morfin

EH&S Manager

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!

Tony Petrik

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

Lion's online training is more comprehensive, has better slides, and is a superior training experience than what I would get from other trainers.

Robert Brenner

District Environmental Manager

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Just starting out with shipping lithium batteries? The four fundamental concepts in this guide are the place to start.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.