2 EPA Rules to Watch in 2017
As it often does, the turnover in US presidential administration this year signals major changes for environmental professionals nationwide.
Now that a new administrator has been sworn in to head the US Environmental Protection Agency, EHS managers are waiting to see how new leadership will impact the air, water, and chemical regulations they deal with every day.
We know already that under the Executive Order on Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs issued last month, Federal Agencies will now be required to eliminate two regulatory requirements for each new significant rulemaking they create.
EPA finalized two new rulemakings in the summer of 2015 that are nearly certain to face challenges under new EPA leadership. EHS managers who have responsibilities for air and water compliance issues should keep an eye on these two rules—EPA’s Clean Power Plan and the Waters of the United States or WOTUS Rule—which have already faced legal scrutiny. These legal battles to some extent involved new EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, who challenged EPA’s authority on behalf of industry as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma.
The Clean Power Plan was a target of legal challenges from states’ Attorneys General, and in February 2016, the US Supreme Court stayed the rule. A stay prevents EPA from implementing or enforcing the Clean Power Plan, pending the outcome of litigation. EPA and states now await the outcome of the court challenge to determine whether the Plan will move forward.
Because the rule was created under the Clean Air Act section 111(d) and already finalized, repealing it is no simple task. To rescind a regulation already in place, the Administrative Procedures Act requires EPA to submit the rule for a public review and comment period and provide evidence that shows a rule change is necessary.
In this case, opponents of the Clean Power Plan believe the cost-benefit analysis EPA conducted while creating the rule was flawed and/or insufficient. That is the main argument being levied against the Clean Power Plan in court, and it will likely be at the center of any attempt by EPA to rescind or repeal it.
In June 2015, EPA finalized a new definition of a key Clean Water Act term—“Waters of the United States.” This rule subjected more bodies of water to US EPA’s Clean Water Act (CWA) programs—oil spill rules, permit requirements, and limits on dredge-and-fill operations—on the basis that they share a “significant nexus” with larger bodies of water like rivers, lakes, and oceans covered under the CWA.
Like the Clean Power Plan, EPA’s WOTUS Rule faced legal challenges. In October 2015, a US Court of Appeals stayed the WOTUS Rule nationwide. Also like the Clean Power Plan, EPA and states now await the resolution of the challenge in court.
When these court cases are resolved, Lion News will report on the decisions and EPA’s likely next steps toward rescinding or retracting the Clean Power Plan or WOTUS rules. The legal challenges to these two rules have outlasted one administration already and could continue for the foreseeable future.
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
New! Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Now that a new administrator has been sworn in to head the US Environmental Protection Agency, EHS managers are waiting to see how new leadership will impact the air, water, and chemical regulations they deal with every day.
We know already that under the Executive Order on Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs issued last month, Federal Agencies will now be required to eliminate two regulatory requirements for each new significant rulemaking they create.
EPA finalized two new rulemakings in the summer of 2015 that are nearly certain to face challenges under new EPA leadership. EHS managers who have responsibilities for air and water compliance issues should keep an eye on these two rules—EPA’s Clean Power Plan and the Waters of the United States or WOTUS Rule—which have already faced legal scrutiny. These legal battles to some extent involved new EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, who challenged EPA’s authority on behalf of industry as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma.
Clean Power Plan for Greenhouse Gases
In August 2015, US EPA completed a Final Rule focused on setting state-specific, rate-based emissions limits for greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions from electricity generators. This major rulemaking, dubbed the Clean Power Plan, specifically aimed to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from coal-fired power plants.
The Clean Power Plan was a target of legal challenges from states’ Attorneys General, and in February 2016, the US Supreme Court stayed the rule. A stay prevents EPA from implementing or enforcing the Clean Power Plan, pending the outcome of litigation. EPA and states now await the outcome of the court challenge to determine whether the Plan will move forward.Because the rule was created under the Clean Air Act section 111(d) and already finalized, repealing it is no simple task. To rescind a regulation already in place, the Administrative Procedures Act requires EPA to submit the rule for a public review and comment period and provide evidence that shows a rule change is necessary.
In this case, opponents of the Clean Power Plan believe the cost-benefit analysis EPA conducted while creating the rule was flawed and/or insufficient. That is the main argument being levied against the Clean Power Plan in court, and it will likely be at the center of any attempt by EPA to rescind or repeal it.
Waters of the United States (WOTUS)
Update 03/01/17: Hours after this blog was posted, the president signed an executive order to require EPA to review its Waters of the United States (WOTUS) Final Rule.In June 2015, EPA finalized a new definition of a key Clean Water Act term—“Waters of the United States.” This rule subjected more bodies of water to US EPA’s Clean Water Act (CWA) programs—oil spill rules, permit requirements, and limits on dredge-and-fill operations—on the basis that they share a “significant nexus” with larger bodies of water like rivers, lakes, and oceans covered under the CWA.
When these court cases are resolved, Lion News will report on the decisions and EPA’s likely next steps toward rescinding or retracting the Clean Power Plan or WOTUS rules. The legal challenges to these two rules have outlasted one administration already and could continue for the foreseeable future.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise. Check out the latest interactive, expertly designed EPA compliance training options here:Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
New! Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
In-flight hazmat incidents can be disastrous. This guide gives 5 tips for first-time air shippers to consider before offering dangerous goods for transportation on passenger or cargo aircraft.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.