Search

OSHA Revises Combustible Dust Emphasis Program

Posted on 2/3/2023 by Nick Waldron

Effective January 30, OSHA revised its National Emphasis Program (NEP) for combustible dust. The purpose of the NEP update is for OSHA to continue to inspect facilities that generate or handle combustible dusts that are likely to cause fire, flash fire, deflagration, and/or explosion hazards.

The updated combustible dust NEP replaces a directive in place since 2008, and will remain in effect until OSHA cancels it. It does not replace OSHA’s directive for inspection of grain handling facilities, but may affect the scope of coverage.

Industries Added to Target List 

Appendix B of the updated directive includes a revised list of industries that OSHA compliance and enforcement officers will use “for targeting purposes.”

That list now includes:  

  • Commercial Bakeries (NAICS 311812)
  • Printing Ink Manufacturing (325910
  • Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, and Planning (321912)
  • Leather and Hide Tanning and Finishing (316110)
  • Truss Manufacturing (321214)
  • ​Grain and Field Bean Merchant Wholesalers (424510)

OSHA added these industries to the targeting list because data collected since the NEP took effect indicates “heightened potential” for combustible dust hazards at their facilities.

The full list of industries targeted for combustible dust starts on page B-1 of the directive.

OSHA also removed six industry groups from the NEP targeting list, including fossil fuel power generation and cookie & cracker manufacturing. OSHA found a lower likelihood of combustible dust hazards at these types of workplaces.

What is Combustible Dust?

OSHA’s NEP includes a definition for combustible dust based on relevant NFPA standards, which reads:

Combustible dust. A finely divided combustible particulate solid that presents a flash-fire hazard or explosion hazard when suspended in air or the process-specific oxidizing medium over a range of concentrations.

Dusts known to cause these hazards include:

  • Metal dust such as aluminum and magnesium.
  • Wood dust.
  • Coal and other carbon dusts.
  • Plastic dust and additives.
  • Biosolids.
  • Other organic dust such as sugar, flour, paper, soap, and dried blood.
  • Certain textile materials.

The directive states that "the majority of combustible dust hazards resulting in fires and explosions involved combustible dust generated during the manufacturing and processing of agricultural, food, wood, and metal products. In 2018, wood and food products made up 70% of materials involved in combustible dust fires and explosions. 

OSHA Website | Combustible Dust: An Explosion Hazard

OSHA Revises Combustible Dust Emphasis Program

Combustible dusts are dusts that, when suspended in the air in a confined space and exposed to an ignition source, can ignite or explode—often with catastrophic results. These dusts may accumulate on rafters or equipment until they are shaken lose and become airborne due to an explosion or other “primary event.”

This video from the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) shows what happened during a combustible dust explosion at a sugar plant in 2008 that killed 14 people and injured 38 others. 
 

What OSHA Regulations Apply to Combustible Dust?

Since initiating the Combustible Dust NEP in 2007, OSHA has conducted approximately 600 inspections per year under the program. While there is no specific OSHA Standard for combustible dust, the Agency relies on multiple workplace health & safety requirements, as well as the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act, to cite violations. 

If dust is found accumulated on surfaces or in material storage areas, for example, OSHA may cite the employer for housekeeping violations under the general industry Standards for Walking-Working Surfaces (1910.22(a)(1)—(2)) or Materials Handling and Storage (1910.176(c)).  

OSHA may also cite an employer for noncompliance with workplace ventilation standards in 1910.94, personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements in 1910.132, or hazard communication information and training requirements in 1910.1200 for hazardous chemicals, among others. .  

Combustible Dust and the OSH Act General Duty Clause

The General Duty Clause of the OSH Act (Section 5(a)(1)) requires employers to provide a workplace for employees that is free of recognized hazards that can cause serious injury or illness. In its combustible dust directive for enforcement personnel, OSHA lists scenarios that could result in a citation for a violation of the General Duty Clause related to combustible dust.

The following are examples of workplace conditions for which a general duty clause citation (See Appendix C for sample citations) may be issued:

  • Problems related to dust collectors, e.g., dust collection equipment located inside the building (however, there are some exceptions) and dust collectors returning air back inside the building.

  • Ductwork-related problems, e.g., the ductwork not being grounded and ductwork not constructed of metal.

  • Improperly designed deflagration venting (venting to areas where employees are likely to be exposed to explosion/deflagration hazards).

  • Processing and material handling equipment, such as, mixers, blenders, pulverizers, mills, dryers, ovens, filters, dust collectors, pneumatic conveyors, and screw conveyors, are not protected by deflagration suppression systems.

  • Blowers, collection systems, and exhaust systems used at sawmills that are not designed, constructed, or maintained properly.

More resources:
OSHA Press Release about the revised NEP
Combustible Dust Safety Poster

Tags: combustible dust, enforcement, OSHA compliance, safety inspections

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.

John Hutchinson

Senior EHS Engineer

Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!

Tony Petrik

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!

Marti Severs

Enterprise Safety Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Decrease spill, release, and injury risk and increase savings with these "source reduction" strategies to prevent unused chemicals from becoming regulated as hazardous waste.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.