Search

Understanding Superfund Discovery and Remediation

Posted on 7/10/2013 by Anthony R. Cardno

On May 21, 2013, EPA announced the addition of 9 hazardous waste sites to the National Priorities List (NPL) and a proposal to add 9 more. This brings the total number of sites listed on the NPL to 1,685. According to EPA, 68% of those sites (1,145) have cleanup remedies in place.

So how does a site become a “Superfund site” and ultimately subject to remediation?

1. The site is discovered and EPA is notified. EPA discovers potential superfund sites through reports of releases of hazardous substances to the National Response Center required under 40 CFR 302. EPA may also learn of a potential superfund site through notices of releases in excess of permitted values, incidental observations by the public, and petitions by motivated citizens.

 

Shipping Lithium Batteries Banner

 

2. EPA conducts a preliminary assessment (PA), and a site inspection (SI) takes place. After discovering a potential cleanup site, the EPA sends a team to acquire and assess samples of contaminated air, water, soil, and other environmental media. The team also investigates pathways of chemical exposure and vulnerable target populations of citizens and natural habitat.

3. If warranted by the PA and SI, EPA will propose adding the site to the NPL. Using information garnered during the assessment and investigation, EPA ranks the site using its Hazard Ranking System. If a site scores highly, the Agency will propose adding it to the National Priorities List (NPL).

Bhopal Gas Tragedy

4. Provided public comment does not change EPA’s opinion of the site’s hazards and cleanup requirements, EPA adds the site to the NPL. After deciding to propose a site as a candidate for the NPL, the EPA will publish a public notice in the Federal Register. This is an opportunity for the candidate site, and the affected community, to comment on the EPA’s decision.

The addition of a site to the NPL does not automatically initiate a cleanup action. A site’s ranking may rise or fall as new sites are added, delaying or hastening the initiation of cleanup. The ultimate goal of the NPL is to make sites safe and clean using new technology, focusing on the worst problems at the worst sites first.

However, when a site is listed on the NPL, liability is automatically assigned to any “potentially responsible party.” Liability is determined after a site is added to the NPL. If EPA cannot identify responsible parties for the newly listed sites, EPA is required to investigate the full extent of the contamination before commencing cleanup activities at the site.

Where are the Superfund sites? EPA has a searchable map!

Learn which of the EPA’s major programs apply to your facility and your responsibilities for emergency preparedness and reporting of releases into the air, water, or land. The two-day Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop covers the core elements of the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, FIFRA, CERCLA (Superfund), and more!

 

Tags: CERCLA, EPA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.

Marc Bugg

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

Best course instructor I've ever had. Funny, relatable, engaging; made it interesting and challenged us as the professionals we are.

Amanda Schwartz

Environmental Coordinator

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.