EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 7/6
Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
WHO: A waste management facility
According to EPA, a waste management facility in Wisconsin improperly disposed of hazardous electric arc furnace dust from a steel casting foundry at a company-owned landfill on at least 10 days. The dust was contaminated with chromium, a hazardous waste and known human carcinogen. The facility was not to treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste.
WHERE: Franklin, WI
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $232,000
Under the terms of the settlement, the facility has agreed to conduct leachate and groundwater monitoring as well as to update its waste management plan and training program. The settlement also includes a civil penalty of $232,000.
WHO: A seafood distributor
A seafood distributor in the Pacific Northwest has settled with EPA over alleged Clean Water Act violations at one if its crab and shrimp processing facilities. EPA cited more than 2,100 alleged violations of the company’s wastewater discharge permit during a 2017 inspection. These include discharge limit violations, as well as violations related to monitoring frequency, incorrect sampling, and incomplete or inadequate reporting.
WHERE: Westport, WA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $190,000
In addition to paying a fine, the company has launched a variety of new programs and implemented technologies to address compliance challenges at the Westport facility. As part of the agreement, the seafood distributor neither confirms nor denies EPA’s allegations.
WHO: A logistics company
On March 9, 2020, EPA filed a consent agreement and final order resolving violations of the Clean Water Act by a Washington logistics company that warehouses perishable goods. According to EPA, the company allegedly discharged pollutants to Fishtrap Creek in violation of its Industrial Stormwater General Permit. Other alleged violations include failure to implement corrective action after benchmark exceedances, failure to document monthly inspections, failure to monitor, and an inadequate stormwater pollution prevention plan.
WHERE: Lynden, WA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $41,500
The company agreed in an administrative compliance order on consent to develop and implement multiple engineering plans that will reduce pollutants from leaving the facility and entering Fishtrap Creek. The company also agreed to pay a penalty of $41,500.
Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager TrainingManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.
Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Tags: Clean Water Act, environmental enforcement, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, RCRA, Washington, Wisconsin
Find a Post
The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.
You blew the doors off the competition!
Lion Technology workshops are amazing!! You always learn so much, and the instructors are fantastic.
If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.
I really enjoy your workshops. Thank you for such a great program and all the help Lion has provided me over the years!
Hazardous Material Pharmacy Technician
Lion provided an excellent introduction to environmental regulations, making the transition to a new career as an EHS specialist less daunting of a task. Drinking from a fire hose when the flow of water is lessened, is much more enjoyable!
I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!
Senior Environmental Engineer
The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.
Material Release Agent
The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.
The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Explore the four specific 29 CFR Standards that OSHA inspectors overwhelmingly cite employers for when investigating COVID-19 exposure in the workplace.