Search

Next Phase of TSCA Chemical Risk Evals Underway

Posted on 7/8/2021 by Roger Marks

TSCA requires EPA to establish management standards for any chemical substance that poses unreasonable risks of injury to health or the environment, based on the results of risk evaluations mandated by the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act or LCSA.

EPA has completed risk evaluations for the original 10 substances and now plans to promulgate TSCA Section 6 management standards for three of those chemicals: HBCD, PV-29, and chrysotile asbestos.

However, the timing for risk management standards for the remaining seven substances is uncertain.

In a TSCA policy updated announced on June 30, EPA announced changes to the risk evaluation process. Based on these changes, EPA will review the other seven completed risk evaluations to ensure that they “follow science and the law.”

What Could Change on Review

A new “whole chemical approach.” EPA is shifting its approach to TSCA risk evaluations. EPA will continue to evaluate the risk for each condition of use. Now, however, EPA will make an unreasonable risk determination for the chemical as a whole when a majority of the conditions of use for that chemical warrant the unreasonable risk label.

More exposure pathways considered. Consider more pathways, incl. possibly air, water, and disposal. Previous efforts to evaluate the risks of these chemicals did not consider pathways for which EPA regulatory programs already exist (e.g., the Clean Air and Water Acts, RCRA, CERCLA, etc.)

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). EPA previously determined that certain uses of the evaluated chemicals present no unreasonable risk. This determination was based on an assumption that employees who use the chemical will be outfitted with proper personal protective equipment (PPE).

EPA now believes that “assumptions that PPE is always provided to workers, and worn properly, are not justified.” With this in mind, the Agency will revisit six of the completed risk evaluations.  

10 Down, 40,000 To Go

EPA will continue to evaluate the risks of TSCA inventory chemicals—and they have their work cut out for them. Results from a one-time TSCA reporting rule in 2016 shows that more than 40,000 chemicals are active in commerce in the United States. 

The “Lautenberg Law” requires EPA to keep 20 risk evaluations moving forward at any given time. In other words, a new risk evaluation must begin each time one is completed. EPA released a list of 20 more high-priority chemicals in late 2020.

Online Training to Master TSCA Compliance

Be confident you can meet your EPA chemical reporting, recordkeeping, and management requirements under TSCA. 

The TSCA Regulations Online Course guides EHS managers through these complex rules—including how to use the TSCA Chemical Inventory; inventory, IUR, or “Form U” reporting responsibilities; Pre Manufacture Notifications (PMN); Significant New Use Rules (SNUR); management standards for PCBs, and much more.

Tags: chemical risk evaluations, chemicals, environmental compliance, lautenberg, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!

Amanda Walsh

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.

Teresa Arellanes

EHS Manager

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

What to do before, during, and after a RCRA hazardous waste inspection to defend your site from rising State and Federal penalties.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.