Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 6/12

Posted on 6/12/2023 by Lion Technology Inc.

US businesses are subject to complex, overlapping environmental regulations related to air emissions, discharges to water, hazardous waste management and disposal, oil spills, chemical management, and more. Failure to comply with all applicable US EPA requirements can result in future liability and civil penalties as high as $100,000+ per day, per violation.

The EPA Enforcement Roundup highlights enforcement actions that offer insight into how and why US EPA and state partners assess penalties for noncompliance for environmental regulations.

All violations or claims discussed below are alleged only unless we say otherwise, and we withhold the names of organizations and individuals to protect their privacy.

Your EPA Enforcement Roundup for this week:

A major brewing company will pay $537,000 for alleged Clean Air and EPCRA violations at eleven breweries across the US.

EPA announced this settlement to resolve alleged environmental violations related to anhydrous ammonia, a common refrigerant, at facilities in eleven US states.

Anhydrous ammonia is considered an extremely hazardous substance by EPA, subject to the requirements for Risk Management Planning (RMP) under the Clean Air Act. Covered facilities must revise and re-submit a plan to EPA every five years. 

The company is required to hire independent experts to review each of the company’s eleven breweries that use anhydrous ammonia in accordance with relevant refrigeration industry standards and implement corrective actions based on the recommendations of those reviews.

A Kansas City environmental company will pay $75,095 in civil penalties to resolve alleged hazardous waste management (RCRA) violations.

A hazardous and solid waste storage facility in Missouri settled with EPA to resolve alleged violations of its RCRA hazardous waste permit.

RCRA permit violations alleged include:

  • Failure to minimize hazardous waste releases.
  • Failure to inspect hazardous waste tanks daily.
  • Failure to equip all open-ended valves or lines with closures.
  • Failure to obtain a hazardous waste permit for wastes not covered by the facility’s existing permit.

The company immediately took steps to return to compliance upon notification, per EPA.

A chemical company in St. Louis will pay a $49,953 penalty to resolve alleged Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) reporting violations.

EPA reviewed chemical inventory records of a facility in St. Louis, finding that the company used quantities of several hazardous chemicals that require reporting under the EPCRA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) program, including methanol, xylene, and toluene, but failed to submit the TRI. 

The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act requires covered facilities to report to EPA on the release, storage, manufacture, processing, or other use of toxic chemicals. 

TRI reporting is due by July 1 each year.

Complete Environmental Regulations Training

Want a clearer idea of how major EPA air, water, and chemical programs all fit together to affect your site's activities? Join in on the next Complete Environmental Regulations Webinar on July 27–28 at Lion.com.

EH&S professionals who attend can identify the regulations that apply to their facility and locate key requirements to achieve compliance with the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to EPCRA, TSCA, Superfund, and more. Prefer to train at your own pace? Try the interactive online course.

Tags: Clean Air Act, EPA Enforcement Roundup, hazardous waste management, RCRA

News and insights delivered to your inbox weekly.
View our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I chose Lion's online webinar because it is simple, effective, and easily accessible.

Jeremy Bost

Environmental Health & Safety Technician

The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!

Brian Martinez

Warehouse Operator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Find out what makes DOT hazmat training mandatory for employees who sign the hazardous waste manifest, a “dually regulated” document for tracking shipments.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.