Lion will be closed on Friday, July 3. For online training support, please contact support@lion.com.
Search

US EPA Aligns with HazCom, Impacts Tier II Reporting, Omits Combustible Dust

Posted on 6/25/2026 by Lion Technology Inc.

The US EPA finalized a rule to conform the Federal environmental regulations with OSHA’s 2024 Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) update. In doing so, the Agency revised the EPCRA hazard categories and the definition of hazard category, removed an obsolete term, and acknowledged OSHA’s new definition for combustible dust without incorporating it into 40 CFR. The rule changes go into effect August 21, 2026.

View the Final Rule in the Federal Register.

The EPCRA Hazard Category Update

The EPA is adopting OSHA’s HCS definitions of “hazard category,” “health hazard,” and “physical hazard.” These new definitions will be used for reporting under the hazardous chemical inventory regulations.

Facilities must comply with these changes starting with the 2027 EPCRA §312 annual inventory reports (i.e., Tier II reporting), due March 1, 2028.

The pre-update definitions of these terms under EPCRA can be found at 40 CFR 370.66 before August 21, 2026.

US EPA Aligns with HazCom, Impacts Tier II Reporting, Omits Combustible Dust

Removing “MSDS” and Redefining “SDS”

“Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)” and “Safety Data Sheet (SDS)” have the same meaning in 40 CFR. Both terms have been used in tandem in the Federal environmental regulations since 2016. All uses of “Material Safety Data Sheet” and “MSDS” will be gone from 40 CFR 370 on August 21, 2026. The definition of “Safety Data Sheet” is changing to align with the definition in—you guessed it—the Hazard Communication Standard.

Find the definition of Safety Data Sheet that the Agency plans to incorporate here.

Why EPA Used Both “MSDS” and “SDS”

OSHA overhauled the HCS in 2012 to incorporate elements of the Globally Harmonized System, or GHS. One change was to replace “Material Safety Data Sheet,” or “MSDS,” with “Safety Data Sheet,” or “SDS,” throughout the Hazard Communication Standard.

The EPA followed OSHA’s lead and revised the EPCRA regulations in 2016 to align them with that 2012 OSHA Rule. The Agency knew that consistency with OSHA’s regulatory language was essential to limit confusion. At the same time, swapping out MSDS for SDS may have confused others.

So, the terms stayed in 40 CFR until the EPA determined that eliminating “Material Safety Data Sheet” would not cause confusion. In doing so, the EPA removed 200 words from the regulations while making those regulations easier to navigate and apply.

Omitting OSHA’s New “Combustible Dust” Definition

In 2024, OSHA codified this definition for combustible dust at 29 CFR 1910.1200(c): “Combustible dust means finely divided solid particulates of a substance or mixture that pose a flashfire hazard or explosion hazard when dispersed in air or other oxidizing media.’’

The EPA is not adding OSHA’s definition of combustible dust to its regulations.

The Agency acknowledged OSHA’s addition of this definition and stated that it is already applicable to 40 CFR 370 by way of the existing reference to the OSHA HCS within the definition of “hazardous chemical” at 40 CFR 370.66, which includes “any hazardous chemical as defined under 29 CFR 1910.1200(c),” with some exceptions.

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!

Marti Severs

Enterprise Safety Manager

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!

Tony Petrik

Hazmat Shipping Professional

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.

Misty Filipp

Material Control Superintendent

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Use this guide as a quick reference to the most common HAZWOPER questions, and get course recommendations for managers and personnel who are in need of OSHA-required HAZWOPER training.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.