Search

Safe Drinking Water Act: Two Kinds of Water Quality Standards

Posted on 3/13/2012 by James Griffin

Q. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Environmental Protection Agency establishes quality standards for public water supply systems. The EPA sets two kinds of standards: “Primary” and “Secondary.” What’s the difference?
 
Primary Water Quality Standards
Primary Standards are health-based, and the EPA sets Primary Standards for contaminants that threaten public health. For each contaminant, a Primary Standard either specifies a treatment technique or sets a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and leaves it up to the public water system to figure out a way to purify the water below that level [40 CFR 141].
 
Secondary Water Quality Standards
Secondary Standards are aesthetic, not health-based. The EPA sets Secondary Standards for contaminants that do not present a health hazard but may make water unpleasant to drink [40 CFR 143].
 
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Enforcement
While the U.S. EPA sets Water Quality Standards, the standards are enforced by both the U.S. EPA and at the State level.
Every public water system must consistently monitor and sample its water supply for contaminants. While the EPA does not require monitoring for secondary contaminants (considering them non-enforceable recommendations), the Agency does recommend monitoring for secondary contaminants on the same schedule as primary inorganic contaminants [40 CFR 143.4]. State regulators may enforce secondary standards and require water systems to monitor and sample for secondary contaminants.
 
Notices of Violation
When a public water system violates a Primary Standard, by exceeding the authorized maximum contaminant level, it must notify its customers. The notification must contain:
 
  • Clear and readily understandable explanations of the violations,
  • The potential health effects,
  • What steps the water system is taking to correct the violation, and
  • Precautions customers should take until the violation is corrected and the water is again safe (“boil water” notifications, etc.)
When a public water system violates a Secondary Standard, the EPA (with one exception) does not require a notification, but State regulators may require one. The one exception is “fluorine.” When a water system violates the Secondary Standard for fluorine without violating the primary standard, it must notify its customers [40 CFR 141, Subpart Q].
 
More Information
The EPA publishes an annual summary of Health Advisories and Drinking Water Quality Standards and provides many guidance documents for regulated entities on its Web site.
 

Tags: EPA, reporting and recordkeeping, Safe Drinking Water Act

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker

Planner

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.

John Hutchinson

Senior EHS Engineer

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

Very well structured, comprehensive, and comparable to live training seminars I've participated in previously. I will recommend the online course to other colleagues with training requirement needs.

Neil Luciano

EHS Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.