Lion.com will be offline for scheduled maintenance on Wednesday, August 19, for about 30 minutes starting at 5:30 PM ET. 
Search

Safe Drinking Water Act: Two Kinds of Water Quality Standards

Posted on 3/13/2012 by James Griffin

Q. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Environmental Protection Agency establishes quality standards for public water supply systems. The EPA sets two kinds of standards: “Primary” and “Secondary.” What’s the difference?
 
Primary Water Quality Standards
Primary Standards are health-based, and the EPA sets Primary Standards for contaminants that threaten public health. For each contaminant, a Primary Standard either specifies a treatment technique or sets a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and leaves it up to the public water system to figure out a way to purify the water below that level [40 CFR 141].
 
Secondary Water Quality Standards
Secondary Standards are aesthetic, not health-based. The EPA sets Secondary Standards for contaminants that do not present a health hazard but may make water unpleasant to drink [40 CFR 143].
 
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Enforcement
While the U.S. EPA sets Water Quality Standards, the standards are enforced by both the U.S. EPA and at the State level.
Every public water system must consistently monitor and sample its water supply for contaminants. While the EPA does not require monitoring for secondary contaminants (considering them non-enforceable recommendations), the Agency does recommend monitoring for secondary contaminants on the same schedule as primary inorganic contaminants [40 CFR 143.4]. State regulators may enforce secondary standards and require water systems to monitor and sample for secondary contaminants.
 
Notices of Violation
When a public water system violates a Primary Standard, by exceeding the authorized maximum contaminant level, it must notify its customers. The notification must contain:
 
  • Clear and readily understandable explanations of the violations,
  • The potential health effects,
  • What steps the water system is taking to correct the violation, and
  • Precautions customers should take until the violation is corrected and the water is again safe (“boil water” notifications, etc.)
When a public water system violates a Secondary Standard, the EPA (with one exception) does not require a notification, but State regulators may require one. The one exception is “fluorine.” When a water system violates the Secondary Standard for fluorine without violating the primary standard, it must notify its customers [40 CFR 141, Subpart Q].
 
More Information
The EPA publishes an annual summary of Health Advisories and Drinking Water Quality Standards and provides many guidance documents for regulated entities on its Web site.
 

Tags: EPA, reporting and recordkeeping, Safe Drinking Water Act

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Lion is easily and consistently the best option for compliance training. I've learned new information from every instructor I've had.

Rachel Mathis

EHS Specialist

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

I really enjoy your workshops. Thank you for such a great program and all the help Lion has provided me over the years!

George Chatman

Hazardous Material Pharmacy Technician

The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!

Brian Martinez

Warehouse Operator

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.