What is a Major Modification for New Source Review Purposes?
Like many Federal agencies, the EPA doesn’t seem to like the idea of sites being “grandfathered” out of regulations, so this expanded definition of the word “new” enables the agency to pull existing facilities into the New Source Review program.
What is New Source Review?NSR is a pre-construction review process. Certain new and existing facilities must go through this review if their Potential to Emit any one of the Criteria Pollutants exceeds certain amounts. Brand new facilities are subject to NSR if their PTE causes them to meet the definition of being a new Major Source (the definition of which depends on the designation of the Air Quality Control Region in which the facility is being built).
But what about existing facilities that already meet the applicable definition of “major source”?
Major ModificationsExisting facilities that meet the applicable definition of “major source” may have existed before the NSR program was introduced or they may have gone through NSR when they were first built. Regardless, they will go through NSR for the first time or again if they intend to make a “major modification” to the facility. If the modification meets the definition of “major modification,” the NSR process must be completed before the modification is made.
Major modifications are defined at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(2) as “any physical change in or change in the method of operation of a major stationary source that would result in:
- A significant emissions increase of a regulated NSR pollutant; and
- A significant net emissions increase of that pollutant from the major stationary source.
What are the regulated NSR pollutants?The NSR program is only concerned about a facility’s potential to emit one or more of the six “criteria pollutants” for which there are National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Those six pollutants are:
- Carbon monoxide
- Nitrogen dioxides
- Sulfur dioxide
- Particulate Matter (both “fine” particulates” and “course” particulates)
- Ozone (and its precursors: volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides)
What is considered a “significant increase” in PTE?The answer is different for each of the criteria pollutants:
- CO: 100 TPY
- NOx: 40 TPY
- S02: 40 TPY
- Ozone: 40 TPY (of VOCs)
- PM: 25 TPY total
- 15 TPY PM10
- 10 TPY PM2.5
- Lead: 0.6 TPY
How to calculate a “significant increase”The existing major source must calculate the difference between the source’s actual baseline emissions and the projected increase. The actual baseline emissions are calculated by looking at any consecutive 24-month period within the previous ten years from the planned modification date.
Projected increases are calculated by process engineers based on hourly emissions rates and the projected level of utilization of the source. If the projected increase itself (not the actual baseline plus the projected increase) meets the definition of “significant” for the criteria pollutant(s) in question, the site must go through NSR before they can make the modification.
What happens next?The exact requirements of NSR will depend on the AQCR’s designation as “attainment” or “non-attainment.” In either case, the facility will be required to obtain a Permit to Construct (PTC) and during the construction process install appropriate control technologies to limit emissions once the facility is up and running.
Master Clean Air Act ComplianceThe Clean Air Act Regulations online course guides professionals through compliance with Title V permit requirements, emissions and pollution controls, annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting, Risk Management Planning (RMP) responsibilities, and more.
Build the expertise needed to make informed decisions that help your site control pollution and maintain compliance. Interactive, easy to use, and available 24/7, the new online course will help you get up to speed with new and changing EPA Clean Air Act rules and protect your facility from costly EPA enforcement.
Tags: Clean Air Act, New Source Review, nsr
Find a Post
Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.
The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.
The instructor was great, explaining complex topics in terms that were easily understandable and answering questions clearly and thoroughly.
The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.
Material Control Superintendent
As always, Lion never disappoints
Lion provided an excellent introduction to environmental regulations, making the transition to a new career as an EHS specialist less daunting of a task. Drinking from a fire hose when the flow of water is lessened, is much more enjoyable!
I have attended other training providers, but Lion is best. Lion is king of the hazmat jungle!!!
Hazardous Waste Technician
Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.
Senior EHS Engineer
Lion is easily and consistently the best option for compliance training. I've learned new information from every instructor I've had.
I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.
Material Production/Logistics Manager
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Shipping papers are a crucial part of safely shipping hazardous materials. See the top 5 mistakes shippers make on shipping papers, and how to avoid them.