Search

What is a Major Modification for New Source Review Purposes?

Posted on 3/30/2021 by Anthony Cardno, CHMM

When it comes to regulations, words don’t always mean what we think they mean. The Federal government has been known to change or expand the meanings of words. For instance, under the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review (NSR) program, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) doesn’t limit the definition of “new” to only brand-new facilities being built from the ground up. They more broadly interpret “new” to mean any facility newly subject to the regulations.

Like many Federal agencies, the EPA doesn’t seem to like the idea of sites being “grandfathered” out of regulations, so this expanded definition of the word “new” enables the agency to pull existing facilities into the New Source Review program.

What is New Source Review?

NSR is a pre-construction review process. Certain new and existing facilities must go through this review if their Potential to Emit any one of the Criteria Pollutants exceeds certain amounts. Brand new facilities are subject to NSR if their PTE causes them to meet the definition of being a new Major Source (the definition of which depends on the designation of the Air Quality Control Region in which the facility is being built). 

But what about existing facilities that already meet the applicable definition of “major source”?

Major Modifications

Existing facilities that meet the applicable definition of “major source” may have existed before the NSR program was introduced or they may have gone through NSR when they were first built. Regardless, they will go through NSR for the first time or again if they intend to make a “major modification” to the facility. If the modification meets the definition of “major modification,” the NSR process must be completed before the modification is made.

Major modifications are defined at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(2) as “any physical change in or change in the method of operation of a major stationary source that would result in:
  • A significant emissions increase of a regulated NSR pollutant; and
  • A significant net emissions increase of that pollutant from the major stationary source.

What are the regulated NSR pollutants?

The NSR program is only concerned about a facility’s potential to emit one or more of the six “criteria pollutants” for which there are National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Those six pollutants are:
  • Carbon monoxide
  • Nitrogen dioxides
  • Sulfur dioxide
  • Particulate Matter (both “fine” particulates” and “course” particulates)
  • Ozone (and its precursors: volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides)
  • Lead

What is considered a “significant increase” in PTE?

The answer is different for each of the criteria pollutants:
  • CO: 100 TPY
  • NOx: 40 TPY
  • S02: 40 TPY
  • Ozone: 40 TPY (of VOCs)
  • PM: 25 TPY total
    • 15 TPY PM10
    • 10 TPY PM2.5
  • Lead: 0.6 TPY

How to calculate a “significant increase”

The existing major source must calculate the difference between the source’s actual baseline emissions and the projected increase. The actual baseline emissions are calculated by looking at any consecutive 24-month period within the previous ten years from the planned modification date.

Projected increases are calculated by process engineers based on hourly emissions rates and the projected level of utilization of the source.  If the projected increase itself (not the actual baseline plus the projected increase) meets the definition of “significant” for the criteria pollutant(s) in question, the site must go through NSR before they can make the modification.

What happens next?

The exact requirements of NSR will depend on the AQCR’s designation as “attainment” or “non-attainment.” In either case, the facility will be required to obtain a Permit to Construct (PTC) and during the construction process install appropriate control technologies to limit emissions once the facility is up and running.

Master Clean Air Act Compliance 

The Clean Air Act Regulations online course guides professionals through compliance with Title V permit requirements, emissions and pollution controls, annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting, Risk Management Planning (RMP) responsibilities, and more. 

Build the expertise needed to make informed decisions that help your site control pollution and maintain compliance. Interactive, easy to use, and available 24/7, the new online course will help you get up to speed with new and changing EPA Clean Air Act rules and protect your facility from costly EPA enforcement. 

Tags: Clean Air Act, New Source Review, nsr

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.

Sharon Ziemek

EHS Manager

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

Lion's online training is more comprehensive, has better slides, and is a superior training experience than what I would get from other trainers.

Robert Brenner

District Environmental Manager

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.

Marc Bugg

Hazardous Waste Professional

This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.

Rachel Stewart

Environmental Manager

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.

Misty Filipp

Material Control Superintendent

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Knowing why TSDFs reject loads of hazardous waste—and the exact steps to follow if it happens—can reduce your anxiety and uncertainty about rejection.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.