Search

Petition Seeks Limits on State Pesticide Labeling Rules

Posted on 3/3/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

Attorneys General from eleven states have petitioned US EPA to revise the requirements for labeling pesticides under FIFRA. The petitioners seek a change to the regulations that would prohibit states from imposing labeling standards for pesticides that are “inconsistent with EPA’s findings and conclusions” about a product’s health risks. 

EPA will accept public comments on the petition until March 24. 


Petition Seeks Limits on State Pesticide Labeling Rules

The Federal FIFRA regulations require product labels to feature specific “hazard and precautionary statements for humans and domestic animals…” These labels must be of a certain size, and must feature text of a certain point size (See 40 CFR 156.60.).

Some States have enacted laws or regulations that go above and beyond what US EPA requires when it comes to labeling products containing certain chemicals. US EPA, who must review and approve of States' environmental programs on a regular basis, generally allows States to create unique rules as long as those rules as at least as stringent as the Federal regulations. States may not, however, require labels that create "false or misleading" statements.  

Proposition 65 in California 

In California, for example, state law dictates that: 
 

No person in the course of doing business shall knowingly and intentionally expose any individual to a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity without first giving clear and reasonable warning to such individual...

California Health & Safety Code §25249.6

This provision was added to California State law by a public initiative called Proposition 65 or Prop 65 in November of 1986, also known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act. 

To implement this law, California created a list of chemicals that are “known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity”. The State updates the list every year, and now lists more than 1,000 chemicals. The "Proposition 65 List" includes many chemicals found in pesticide or herbicide products, including glyphosate.

Companies whose products contain these substances must notify consumers about the potential hazards, and take steps to prevent releases of hazardous chemicals to drinking water. 

EPA has the authority to disapprove of labeling rules like the ones created by California's Proposition 65. In 2019, EPA made it clear in a letter that they would no longer approve California Proposition 65 warning labels for products that contain glyphosate (known as the active ingredient in Roundup products). 

Labeling the chemical as a potential carcinogen constituted a "false and misleading statement," the Agency said at the time. Citing several earlier evaluations of the chemical (including by California) that found no substantial risk to public health, EPA determined that it was "false and misleading" to declare otherwise on packaging. Glyphosate was added to the Proposition 65 list in 2017, after the substance was designated as a "likely carcinogen" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.

George Alva

Manufacturing Manager

The instructor does a great job at presenting material in an approachable way. I have been able to save my company about $30,000 in the last year with what I have learned from Lion!

Curtis Ahonen

EHS&S Manager

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

I like Lion's workshops the best because they really dig into the information you need to have when you leave the workshop.

Tom Bush, Jr.

EHS Manager

Best course instructor I've ever had. Funny, relatable, engaging; made it interesting and challenged us as the professionals we are.

Amanda Schwartz

Environmental Coordinator

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Ace hazmat inspections. Protect personnel. Defend against civil and criminal penalties. How? See the self-audit "best practices" for hazardous materials shippers.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.