Search

Is It Recordable? Diagnosed Mental Illness

Posted on 3/25/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

Under OSHA's injury and illness reporting requirements, employers are not required to record mental illness as work-related unless the employee voluntarily provides the company with an opinion from a medical professional with “appropriate training and experience” stating that the employee has a mental illness that is work-related (29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix)).

Recently, an employer cited by OSHA for alleged injury and illness recordkeeping violations challenged those citations and asked a Federal appeals court “to narrowly define which medical professionals can diagnose mental-health illnesses.” The employer received a citation for declining to record mental illnesses cases reported by three employees following an explosion at the facility.

Each employee presented the employer with a diagnosis of a work-related mental health issue. The employer believed, however, that the persons who provided those diagnoses lacked the qualifications required by 29 CFR 1904. Therefore, the employer did not record these three cases as work related. 

An administrative law judge sided with the employer in part, vacating two of the three citations. For one case, the judge determined the diagnosing medical professional not qualified to make the diagnosis. In the second case, the judge ruled that the diagnoses was not work-related. The third citation was upheld because the company “didn’t provide any counter as to why the illness wasn’t work-related,” per the judge.

Is It Recordable? Diagnosed Mental Illness

OSHA and Work-related Mental Illness 

The OSHA recordkeeping regulation at 29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix) reads: 

You are not required to record injuries and illnesses if... The illness is a mental illness. Mental illness will not be considered work-related unless the employee voluntarily provides the employer with an opinion from a physician or other licensed health care professional with appropriate training and experience (psychiatrist, psychologist, psychiatric nurse practitioner, etc.) stating that the employee has a mental illness that is work-related.

29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(ix)


Because the word “appropriate” (meaning “especially suitable or compatible”) appears in the regulation above, the Court assessed whether each diagnosing provider had training that was “especially suitable" and “compatible” with that of professionals listed in the regulation (e.g., psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric nurse practitioners).

While the Court vacated two of the three citations, the judge ultimately rejected the employer's request to more clearly define the criteria for diagnosing mental health cases. The court based its decision in part on the statement that “it is well established that…a standard must be construed so as to avoid an absurd result.” The Judge argued that it would be "absurd" to exclude a diagnosis from a medical professional whose profession is not listed but who nonetheless has the requisite training and experience to make the diagnosis in question. 
 

Self-paced, Online OSHA Health & Safety Training

Get online OSHA safety training that prepares workers to identify and protect themselves from workplace health and safety hazards, including many of OSHA's Top 10 Most Cited Standards.

Tags: osha, OSHA compliance

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

This is the best RCRA training I've experienced! I will be visiting Lion training again.

Cynthia L. Logsdon

Principal Environmental Engineer

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

The instructor kept the class engaged and made learning fun. There was a lot of information to cover but time flew by. I will definitely use Lion in the future!

Chelsea Minguela

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Lion was very responsive to my initial questions and the website was user friendly.

Michael Britt

Supply Chain Director

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!

Brian Martinez

Warehouse Operator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

In-flight hazmat incidents can be disastrous. This guide gives 5 tips for first-time air shippers to consider before offering dangerous goods for transportation on passenger or cargo aircraft.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.