Lion's office will be closed on Friday, July 4, in observance of Independence Day. For help with online training, please contact support@lion.com.
Search

Question of the Week: Using a Mass Balance Approach for RCRA Tanks

Posted on 5/24/2011 by Lion Technology Inc.

Q. Does a hazardous waste storage tank need to be emptied every 90 days (or 180 days), or can a ”mass balance approach” be taken?
 
A. EPA stated in the January 11, 1982 issue of the Federal Register (47 FR 1250) that generators must remove all wastes from the tank within 90 days from the time he first places waste in the “empty” tank. The discussion goes on to say that the tank is considered empty “when its contents have been drained to the fullest extent possible…but it is not expected that 100% of the wastes will always be removed.” 
 
The EPA recognized that tank systems do not always allow for complete drainage due to flanges, screens, or siphons. Therefore, as general guidance, the EPA stated that a tank is considered empty when “the generator has left the tank’s drainage system open until a steady, continuous flow has ceased.”
 
In October 12, 2006, the EPA was asked whether a “mass balance approach” was acceptable in proving that no waste was accumulated in a storage tank for more than the applicable time limit. In their answer, the EPA stated that their interpretation of 40 CFR 262.34(a)(1)(ii) does allow for this mass balance approach. 
 
The conclusion is that tanks can be operated in one of two ways: in a “batch process or in a continuous flow process.”
 
The batch process refers to when a tank would receive a “batch” of hazardous waste, or subsequent batches, and the tank is fully emptied within 90 days from the date the first drop of hazardous waste was placed in the tank. 
 
The continuous flow process is when a tank receives hazardous waste on an ongoing basis. In this scenario, the EPA discusses a “mass balance approach.” The “key parameters” for this approach take into account things such as: the daily throughput of hazardous waste, the time period the waste resides, and the volume of the tank. 
 
The EPA considered that under a continuous flow process where periodically emptying the tank is impractical, a generator could comply with the 90-day accumulation limit by measuring the volume of hazardous waste that flows into and out of the tank and showing that an amount of hazardous waste at least equal to the volume of the tank flows through during each 90-day period. This is called a“mass balance approach.”
 
Another important thing to note is that it is the generator’s responsibility to prove the continuous flow process does not allow waste to accumulate more than 90- (or 180-) days and meets all the requirements applicable to the tank. The EPA discusses examples of ways to prove this, such using equipment to monitor material entering and leaving the tank and recording the results. 
 
 

Tags: hazardous, RCRA, waste

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I can't say enough how pleased I was with this course! Everything finally makes sense.

Kim Graham

Lab Manager

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

Lion courses are the standard to which all other workshops should strive for!

Brody Saleen

Registered Environmental Health Specialist

These are the best classes I attend each year. I always take something away and implement improvements at my sites.

Kim Racine

EH&S Manager

The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.

Tom Berndt

HSE Coordinator

The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.

Misty Filipp

Material Control Superintendent

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Ace hazmat inspections. Protect personnel. Defend against civil and criminal penalties. How? See the self-audit "best practices" for hazardous materials shippers.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.