Search

EPA Denies Four Challenges to GHG Endangerment Finding

Posted on 5/2/2022 by Roger Marks and Anthony Cardno, CHMM

US EPA has denied four petitions challenging the Agency’s 2009 determination that emissions of greenhouse gases to the air endanger human health.  

The Clean Air Act, amended in 1990, authorizes US EPA to regulate air pollution “which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare.” The Clean Air Act requires EPA to make determinations about the public health implications of air emissions from stationary sources (e.g., power plants) and mobile sources (e.g., cars and trucks).

EPA’s 2009 Endangerment Finding relates to six “long-lived and directly-emitted” greenhouse gases:
  • Carbon dioxide  (CO2)
  • Methane (CH4)
  • Nitrous oxide (N2O)
  • Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
  • Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
  • Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)
The 2009 Endangerment Finding paved the way for EPA to regulate GHGs under various Clean Air Act programs. Today, EPA requires industrial facilities that emit certain pollutants to report through the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program or GHGRP.

A forthcoming proposed rule would amend the GHGRP to update calculation and monitoring methods and require reporting of additional data, among other revisions (Fact Sheet).

In April 2022, EPA released the latest Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks.

The result of EPA denying these petitions is that the 2009 Endangerment Finding remains in place.  

Landmark EPA and Supreme Court actions related to greenhouse gases since 2000 include: 

[2003] EPA Denies Petition to Regulate GHGs 

In 2003, EPA denied a petition for the agency to regulate greenhouse gases from motor vehicles. Greenhouse gases did not satisfy the Clean Air Act criteria for “air pollutants,” EPA said at the time.

Many disagreed with EPA’s decision. Before long, the Supreme Court was asked to weigh in.

[2007] Massachusetts vs. EPA 

In the 2007 case Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court ruled that greenhouse gases “fit well within the Clean Air Act’s definition of air pollutant.”

Because GHGs are an air pollutant, US EPA has a legal responsibility to judge whether greenhouse gases contribute to climate change. EPA’s mandate to regulate air pollution is broad, partly by design. As one Supreme Court Justice put it in the 2007 decision:
 
“While Congress…might not have appreciated the possibility that burning fossil fuels could lead to global warming, they did understand that without regulatory flexibility, changing circumstances…would soon render the Clean Air Act obsolete.”

- Justice Stevens (Opinion dated April 2, 2007)


[2009] Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding  

The Supreme Court decision Mass. v. EPA required EPA to consider greenhouse gases as an air pollutant.

After completing the legal process to reach a determination, EPA decided that—yes, greenhouse gases do contribute to climate change. Therefore, they endanger human health and welfare and must be regulated under the Clean Air Act. This led EPA to create stricter fuel economy standards for motor vehicles.

The determination was upheld in 2012.

[2011—2014] GHGs and Title V Permitting

In 2011, the EPA “tailored” the definition of “major source” under both the Title V Permitting and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) programs so that only sites with the Potential to Emit (PTE) greater than or equal to 100,000 tons per year of greenhouse gases would be subject to the permitting requirements.

On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court decided that the EPA did not have the authority to change the definition of “major source” for one group of pollutants, but that PSD permits based on emissions of Clean Air Act “criteria pollutants” could continue to require limits on GHG emissions based on Best Available Control Technology (BACT).

EPA has made recommendations to state permitting authorities for how to incorporate GHG emissions controls into PSD and/or Title V permits.

In 2016, EPA proposed action revise Title V and PSD permitting to align with the courts' decisions on greenhouse gases. As of now, no final action has been taken. 

Clean Air Act Regulations Online Course 

Lion's unique Clean Air Act Regulations Online Course guides environmental professionals through the details and requirements of major Clean Air Act programs—from operating permits to emissions controls to greenhouse gas reporting. 

Tags: environmental compliance, EPA, greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas reporting

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion is at the top of the industry in compliance training. Course content and structure are updated frequently to make annual re-training enjoyable. I like that Lion has experts that I can contact for 1 year after the training.

Caroline Froning

Plant Chemist

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

One of the best trainings I have ever received!

Brandon Morfin

EH&S Manager

Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.

Jim Jani

Environmental Coordinator

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

This is the best RCRA training I've experienced! I will be visiting Lion training again.

Cynthia L. Logsdon

Principal Environmental Engineer

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.

Stephanie Gilliam

Material Production/Logistics Manager

I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.

Shane Hersh

Materials Handler

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Just starting out with shipping lithium batteries? The four fundamental concepts in this guide are the place to start.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.