4 TSCA Updates for Chemical Industry Pros
EPA is working to revise many of the TSCA chemical risk determinations completed in 2020. A draft of the revised TCE Risk Determination was announced on July 7, 2022. EPA will accept public comments on the draft revision until August 8.
A revised Risk Determination for Pigment Violet 29 (PV29) was released in March 2022.
EPA is progressing on chemical risk evaluations required under TSCA at a fast and furious pace. This month brought four TSCA-related announcements that chemical manufacturers, distributors, and users should be aware of.
Since October 30, EPA has extended the deadline for CDR submission, released a final TSCA risk evaluation for trichloroethylene (TCE), revised its draft risk evaluation for PV 29, and performed supplemental analysis on its 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation.
EPA Extends Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Deadline
US EPA will extend the deadline for Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) submission until January 29, 2021.
EPA posted a notice of the extension to the Federal Register on November 25, 2020.
The TSCA CDR submission period typically ends on September 30. Earlier this year, the deadline to report was extended until November 30. Stakeholders requested additional time due to technical issues they experienced with EPA's electronic reporting tool, e-CDRweb, so EPA extended the CDR reporting deadline again.
Read more: Who Must Submit the TSCA CDR?
EPA's final chemical risk evaluation for Trichloroethylene (TCE) appeared in the Federal Register on November 24, 2020.
Final Risk Evaluation for TCE
EPA found unreasonable risk to workers, occupational non-users, consumers, and bystanders in 52 of the 54 use cases studied across manufacturing, processing, and use of TCE. EPA found no unreasonable risk to the environment. With the final risk evaluation complete, EPA now has two years to create new restrictions or protections to address the risks identified for TCE.
Final Risk Evaluation for TCE
Revised Draft: C.I. Pigment Violet 29US EPA released a revised draft risk evaluation for C.I. Pigment Violet 29 (PV 29) on October 30 and extended the comment period for twenty days, until December 19, 2020.
Revised Draft Risk Evaluation for PV 29
Supplemental Analysis: 1,4-DioxaneEPA requested public comment on a supplemental analysis to its draft risk evaluation for 1,4-dioxane.
EPA reviewed eight additional consumer uses where 1,4-dioxane is present as a byproduct, none of which were covered in the initial draft risk evaluation. Uses EPA studied include surface cleaners, detergents, and paints and lacquers. EPA found no unreasonable risk for any of the additional eight additional uses analyzed.
Supplemental Analysis and Draft Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane
Risk Evaluations Will Keep ComingSince the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, also known as LCA or the "Lautenberg Law," amended TSCA, the law requires US EPA to evaluate the risks posed by all chemicals listed on the TSCA Inventory. If EPA's risk evaluation identifies unreasonable risk to the environment or human health the agency must create new restrictions on the manufacture, processing, or use of that chemical.
Find more updates on EPA's ongoing effort to evaluate the risks of all chemicals on the TSCA inventory in our blog.
Last of 2020! Dec. 2–3 | Complete EPA Regulations TrainingThis unique two-day webinar covers the latest environmental regulations you should be familiar with for 2021:
- EPA's new Waters of the US (WOTUS) Rule
- Major Lautenberg Law amendments to TSCA
- CSB's new chemical release reporting rule
- The latest Clean Air Act requirements for facilities
Or learn at your own pace with these two easy-to-use online courses:
Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course
TSCA Regulations Online Course
Tags: environmental compliance, lautenberg, TSCA
Find a Post
No comparison. Lion has the best RCRA training ever!!
The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.
Lion's online training is more comprehensive, has better slides, and is a superior training experience than what I would get from other trainers.
District Environmental Manager
My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.
Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation
I can take what I learned in this workshop and apply it to everyday work and relate it to my activities.
This training broke down the regulations in an easy-to-understand manner and made them less overwhelming. I now feel I have the knowledge to make more informed decisions.
Lion was very responsive to my initial questions and the website was user friendly.
Supply Chain Director
This course went above my expectations from the moment I walked in the door. The instructor led us through two days packed with useful compliance information.
Amazing instructor; real-life examples. Lion training gets better every year!
Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!
Hazmat Shipping Professional
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.