Remembering Pan Am Flight 160—50 Years Later
November 3, 2023 marked the 50th anniversary of one of the most impactful hazmat disasters in history. Pan Am Flight 160 (call sign: "Clipper 160"), a cargo flight headed to Frankfurt, Germany from JFK Airport in New York City, crashed—likely because of improperly packaged hazardous materials.
Not long after departing from JFK on November 3, 1973, the three-man flight crew of Clipper 160 reported smoke in the electronic equipment center situated under the cockpit. The crew planned to make a landing in Boston, but were granted a landing back at JFK. Then the cockpit filled with thick smoke, changing the landing plan back to Boston.
The smoke became so thick that the crew lost control of the plane. Loaded with 52,912 lbs. of cargo including 15,360 lbs. of chemicals, the aircraft struck the ground nose-down less than one hundred yards from the end of the approved runway. No one on board survived.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) could not determine the cause of the “continuously generated and uncontrollable” smoke, but the Board believes that nitric acid leaked and reacted with sawdust it was packed in.
A “general lack of compliance” with the then-current regulations is believed to be a contributing factor, and that lack of compliance, NTSB claimed, “resulted from the complexity of the regulations, the industry wide lack of familiarity with the regulations at the working level, the over-lapping jurisdictions, and the inadequacy of government surveillance.”
In early 1975, the New York Times reported:
WASHINGTON, Feb. 24—The fatal crash of a Pan American World Airways cargo jet at Boston in November, 1973, was attributed today to inadequate regulations for the air shipment of hazardous materials and lax enforcement by the company and the Federal Aviation Administration of existing regulations.
The National Transportation Safety Board said that this laxity permitted improperly packaged nitric acid and other hazardous materials to be placed on board Clipper 160 without the knowledge of the crew.
New York Times, February 25, 1975
Reproducing the Hazmat Reaction
The Board’s accident report includes testing done to recreate the reaction of nitric acid improperly packed in saw dust—the situation that is believed to cause the smoke that filled the cockpit of Flight 160.
From the report, pages 14 and 15:
Test of Leaking Nitric Acid
Numerous hazardous materials on Clipper 160 had not been packaged according to regulations. Nitric acid was one. [The regulations require] nitric acid bottles ‘be placed in tightly closed metal containers, and well cushioned therein on all side with incombustible mineral packing material…The metal container must be packed in outside containers and well cushioned by incombustible mineral packing material as described in this section.’
The nitric acid bottles were found packed in marked wooden boxes and were cushioned by sawdust. There were no inside metal containers. On November 13, 1973, tests were conducted to determine the effects of leaking nitric acid.
- Wind Velocity 11kn.
Dew Point 31°F.
Packing materials recovered were air-dried. The packing material was then used to repack a bottle of nitric acid. The bottle cap was in place, but completely loose—no threads were engaged.
The box into which the bottle had been packed was then inverted, and the time recorded as 0:00 minutes. The following observations were made:7 min: Bluish-white smoke was observed from around the lower surface on the container.
11 min: The smoke downwind had an odor similar to that of burning wood.
13 min: The white smoke flared profusely around the box and was orange momentarily.
15 min: The quantity of smoke reduced.
17 min: The odor of the smoke was similar to that of burning wood.
19 ½ min: Flames were visible near the bottom of the box.
21 ½ min: Flames penetrated the top of the container.
The ground on all sides of the nitric acid box was sooted heavily.
Response to the 1973 Disaster
NTSB made 16 safety recommendations following its investigation of the incident—the first, on November 29, 1973, and the last on October 1, 1974.
The President of the United States signed the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act of 1975 into law less than two years after the incident on January 3, 1975. On this anniversary we remember the three crewmembers of Pan Am Flight 160. This tragic loss reminds us of the importance of the safe and compliant shipment of hazardous materials.
The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.
Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer
Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.
Senior Director of EH&S
If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.
The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.
Mary Sue Michon
My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.
The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.
I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.
Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.
Chemical Laboratory Manager
The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.
Best course instructor I've ever had. Funny, relatable, engaging; made it interesting and challenged us as the professionals we are.
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
What to do before, during, and after a RCRA hazardous waste inspection to defend your site from rising State and Federal penalties.