Search

TSCA Reform Status Report: 1 Year Later

Posted on 10/6/2017 by Anthony Cardno

On June 22, 2016, President Obama signed into law the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (LCSA), more commonly referred to as “TSCA Reform.” The new law focused heavily on creating new risk-based safety standards and establishing a mandatory requirement for the EPA to evaluate existing chemicals under strict and enforceable deadlines.

More than one year later, where does the Environmental Protection Agency stand on meeting its responsibilities for implementing TSCA reform?


New TSCA Risk-based Safety Standards

TSCA required the EPA to create “cradle-to-grave” management programs for any chemical that poses an unreasonable risk of injury to human health and the environment. The Lautenberg Act revises the standard by which the EPA makes an “unreasonable risk” determination. The Lautenberg Act requires EPA to create a risk-based screening process for identifying which chemicals already on the TSCA Inventory exhibit a high- or low-priority for safety assessment within one year.
 


The EPA has created this screening process and on November 10, 2016, identified the first 10 chemicals that will undergo the process. Each of these 10 will be designated as “high priority” (a full risk-evaluation will follow as well as probably regulatory development) or “low priority” (no further action will be taken).

Decisions about the chemicals must be made before June 22, 2019. By 2019, three years from the development of the screening process, the EPA is required to enlarge the list of chemicals being evaluated to 20 high-priority and 20 low-priority chemicals.


The TSCA Chemical Inventory “Reset Rule”

The regulations for creating the initial TSCA inventory were promulgated into 40 CFR 710 in 1977. By 2015, the Inventory had grown to about 85,000 chemicals. There was some concern that some of these chemicals might no longer be manufactured in or imported into the United States.

Section 10 of the Lautenberg Act requires the EPA to categorize chemicals on the TSCA Inventory as active or inactive and to reaffirm any Confidential Business Information (CBI) claims on chemicals already on the Inventory. The EPA has five years chemical inventory subject to TSCAafter compiling the list of active chemicals to review all CBI claims. EPA has promulgated the rules for what is being called the “Inventory Reset” into 40 CFR 710.

Manufacturers and processors must submit a one-time retrospective notice to indicate which of the 85,000 chemicals on the Inventory they have manufactured or imported in a ten-year period from June 21, 2006 to June 21, 2016. This notice, the Notice of Activity Form A, must be submitted to EPA by February 7, 2018. Any chemical not reported as being manufactured or imported in that ten-year period will be deemed “inactive” and separated out from the “active” chemicals.

Once EPA has moved a listed chemical to the inactive list, any person planning to manufacture, import, or process the substance must submit a Notice of Activity Form B not more than 90 days prior to the anticipated date of manufacturing, importing, or processing.

Read more about the “TSCA inventory reset rule” here: TSCA Inventory Reset Reporting Requirement.


Live Training on TSCA Reports and Recordkeeping

Join a full-time Lion instructor and TSCA expert on October 19 from 1—3 PM for the final TSCA Reporting & Recordkeeping Rules Webinar of 2017!

Find out what you must collect, report, and keep on file to maintain compliance with EPA’s latest TSCA chemical reporting and recordkeeping regulations. Plus, get the latest updates on EPA’s efforts to implement TSCA reform and how new chemical reporting requirements are already impacting chemical facilities nationwide.
 

Tags: chemicals, EPA, lautenberg, reporting and recordkeeping, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion courses are the standard to which all other workshops should strive for!

Brody Saleen

Registered Environmental Health Specialist

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

The instructor created a great learning environment.

Avinash Thummadi

CAD & Environmental Manager

Very good. I have always appreciated the way Lion Tech develops, presents and provides training and materials.

John Troy

Environmental Specialist

Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.

Jim Jani

Environmental Coordinator

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

Lion's training was by far the best online RCRA training I've ever taken. It was challenging and the layout was great!

Paul Harbison

Hazardous Waste Professional

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Four key considerations to help you maximize the convenience and quality of your experience with online training.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.