How GHS Affects OSHA’s Flammable Liquid Standard

Posted on 9/2/2014 by Joel Gregier

Flammable and combustible liquids have the potential to harm employees in the workplace, typically due to the fire hazard they pose. Because of this, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) maintains general requirements for the handling, storage, and use of liquids with a flash point below 200°F (“flammable liquids”) in containers, portable tanks, and tank systems. [29 CFR 1910.106]
The standard addresses the requirements for:
  • Design, construction, and capacity of flammable or combustible liquid storage units;
  • Ventilation; and
  • Storage.
GHS Modification
OSHA recently adopted the Globally Harmonized System for Classifying and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). While the bulk of the adopted standards relate to OSHA’s Hazard Communication (HazCom) Standard, GHS also affects several other OSHA regulations, including the Flammable Liquid Standard.
The main modification to the Flammable Liquid Standard is how flammables are classified.
“Old” Flammable and Combustible Classification
Under OSHA’s “old” standard (pre-GHS), liquids were defined as either “flammable” or “combustible” and divided into three “classes.” 
Flammables were considered the more dangerous liquids under the pre-GHS standard. These liquids have lower flash points, meaning that they ignite more easily. Flammable liquids were defined as any liquid with a flash point below 100°F and were considered to be “Class 1 liquids.” A flammable could be Class 1A, 1B, or 1C, with 1A being the most dangerous.
OSHA defined combustibles as liquids with a flash point ranging from 100°F to 200°F. These liquids were divided into Class 2 and Class 3 liquids. Class 2 combustibles were more flammable than Class 3, due to their lower flash points.
The goal of OSHA’s pre-GHS standard was to ensure that the liquids that posed the greatest hazard were regulated more stringently than less hazardous liquids. 
“New” Flammable Classification
Now that OSHA has adopted the GHS, the Class 1, 2, and 3 distinctions no longer exist. “Flammable liquids” are now divided into four “categories.” Despite the change, OSHA’s goal remains the same: to reserve the most stringent regulations for the most dangerous liquids. In fact, many of the old classes have approximately the same cut-off levels for flash point and boiling point as the new categories.
Below are the four categories of flammable liquids (with their approximate “old class” as comparison):
  • Category 1 – liquids having flash points below 73.4°F (23°C) and a boiling point at or below 95°F (35°C) (~IA);
  • Category 2 – liquids having flash points below 73.4°F (23°C) and a boiling point above 95°F (35°C) (~IB);
  • Category 3 – liquids having flash points at or above 73.4°F (23°C) and at or below 140°F (60°C) (~IC and II); and
  • Category 4 – liquids having flash points above 140°F (60°C) and at or below 199.4°F (93°C) (~III). 
 [29 CFR 1910.106(a)(19)]
To find all of the requirements under OSHA’s Flammable Liquid Standard, see 29 CFR 1910.106.
OSHA Requires Employee HazCom Training 
Under OSHA’s Hazard Communication (HazCom) Standard, all employers must train employees on the hazards present in their workplace. The Hazard Communication Online Course has been updated to include important information about OSHA’s adoption of the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) into its HCS. Employees who complete the course will be prepared to recognize new GHS chemical labels, use revised classification criteria, and read 16-section Safety Data Sheets (SDSs).

Tags: GHS, HazCom, materials handling, osha

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor was excellent. They knew all of the material without having to read from a notepad or computer.

Gary Hartzell

Warehouse Supervisor

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

I like the consistency of Lion workshops. The materials are well put together and instructors are top notch!

Kevin Pylka

Permitting, Compliance & Environmental Manager

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!

Amanda Walsh

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

A guide to developing standard operating procedures, or SOPs, that help you select, manage, and audit your hazmat agents and contractors.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.