Lion will be closed on Friday, April 3. For online training support, please contact support@lion.com.
Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 9/16

Posted on 9/16/2024 by Lion Technology Inc.

The EPA Enforcement Roundup gives you insight into how and why US EPA and state partners assess penalties for environmental noncompliance. 

All violations or claims discussed below are alleged only unless we say otherwise, and we withhold the names of organizations and individuals to protect their privacy.

Your EPA Enforcement Roundup for this week:


A specialty chemical manufacturer will pay $89,768 in penalties and equipment for local responders to resolve alleged RCRA violations.

During a May 2023 inspection, EPA determined that the manufacturer qualified as a “large quantity generator” of hazardous waste but failed to meet the requirements of a facility producing that much waste. The alleged violations included:

  • Accumulating hazardous waste for longer than 90 days.
  • Failing to prepare a contingency plan to respond to emergencies.
  • Failing to plan with local emergency responders in the event of a release or threat of a release of hazardous waste.

Because the company failed to meet these requirements, it was operating as an unpermitted treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF).


A petroleum company will pay a $103,377 penalty to resolve alleged Clean Water Act violations in Maui.

In February 2023, EPA inspected the facility to evaluate compliance with the requirements of Clean Water Act Section 311. Based on a 2023 inspection, EPA noted that secondary containment system was not capable of preventing oil from escaping the system before a potential cleanup could occur.

Per EPA, the facility also failed to:

  • Provide sufficient secondary containment capacity that would contain the largest bulk storage container and precipitation.
  • Comply with the applicable industry standards for integrity testing of the additive bulk storage containers and the requirements for qualifications of workers performing the tests and inspections.


A dairy product company agreed to pay a $93,107 civil penalty to resolve alleged Clean Air Act chemical risk prevention violations.

EPA claims the company stores over 10,000 pounds of anhydrous ammonia and failed to comply with regulations intended to protect the surrounding community from accidental releases. The company allegedly failed to:

  • Update emergency contacts.
  • Conduct compliance audits at least every three years.
  • Conduct and document emergency response coordination activities.


Complete Environmental Regulations Training

Want a clearer idea of how major EPA air, water, and chemical programs all fit together to affect your site's activities? Join in on the next Complete Environmental Regulations Webinar on December 19–20 at Lion.com.

EH&S professionals who attend can identify the regulations that apply to their facility and locate key requirements to achieve compliance with the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to EPCRA, TSCA, Superfund, and more. Prefer to train at your own pace? Try the interactive online course.

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

Lion's online training is more comprehensive, has better slides, and is a superior training experience than what I would get from other trainers.

Robert Brenner

District Environmental Manager

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

Lion's training was by far the best online RCRA training I've ever taken. It was challenging and the layout was great!

Paul Harbison

Hazardous Waste Professional

Best course instructor I've ever had. Funny, relatable, engaging; made it interesting and challenged us as the professionals we are.

Amanda Schwartz

Environmental Coordinator

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

A guide to developing standard operating procedures, or SOPs, that help you select, manage, and audit your hazmat agents and contractors.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.