FAA Fines 3 Companies for Hazmat Shipping Violations
For hazmat air shippers, the 58th Edition of IATA’s Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR) is in effect as of January 1, 2017. Understanding the latest rules for hazmat air shipments is crucial to avoid costly fines, rejected shipments, and incidents in transit.
Learn from these mistakes to keep your hazmat shipments moving in compliance and on time.
A Columbus, OH–based distribution company will pay a $63,000 civil penalty to settle allegations it failed to properly mark, label, or complete shipping papers for an air shipment of corrosive wood cleaner.
Again in this case, the noncompliant hazmat shipment was discovered when it began leaking at a package sorting facility, again in Kentucky.
Lastly, an Atlanta, GA container company failed to meet 49 CFR and IATA DGR requirements, including preparing a shipper’s declaration, classification, packaging, marking, labeling, and providing emergency response information. In addition, the company failed to provide required hazmat training for employees involved in preparing shipments.
We’re kicking off 2017 with hazmat workshops in Boston, Hartford, Albany, New Jersey, Philadelphia, and Baltimore. Click here to see the 2017 schedule and sign up now.
Learn from these mistakes to keep your hazmat shipments moving in compliance and on time.
$72,000 for Flammable Solvents and More
A South Korean shipper was fined $72,000 for a 2014 incident in which a shipment of flammable solvents, pain, and resins offered for air transportation was found leaking at a package sorting facility in Kentucky. The company failed to select authorized packaging for the shipment and did not properly mark, label, or complete shipping papers as required under US DOT and IATA hazmat regulations.
$63,000 for Corrosive Wood Cleaner
A Columbus, OH–based distribution company will pay a $63,000 civil penalty to settle allegations it failed to properly mark, label, or complete shipping papers for an air shipment of corrosive wood cleaner.Again in this case, the noncompliant hazmat shipment was discovered when it began leaking at a package sorting facility, again in Kentucky.
$57,400 for Xylene by Air
Lastly, an Atlanta, GA container company failed to meet 49 CFR and IATA DGR requirements, including preparing a shipper’s declaration, classification, packaging, marking, labeling, and providing emergency response information. In addition, the company failed to provide required hazmat training for employees involved in preparing shipments.This Month: Hazmat Training in Boston, Hartford, Albany, NJ, Philly, Baltimore, and More!
Prepare your team to keep hazmat shipments in compliance with new and changing rules, in 2017 and beyond! Don’t miss Lion Technology’s nationally trusted Complete Multimodal Hazmat Shipper Certification Workshops for complete 49 CFR, IATA, and IMDG Code training on the 2017 rules to ship dangerous goods by ground, air, and vessel.We’re kicking off 2017 with hazmat workshops in Boston, Hartford, Albany, New Jersey, Philadelphia, and Baltimore. Click here to see the 2017 schedule and sign up now.
Tags: FAA, fines and penalties, hazmat shipping, IATA
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
In-flight hazmat incidents can be disastrous. This guide gives 5 tips for first-time air shippers to consider before offering dangerous goods for transportation on passenger or cargo aircraft.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.