Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 7/13

Posted on 7/13/2020 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A fertilizer manufacturer
WHERE: Rock Springs, WY
WHAT: RCRA and EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $775,000 plus nearly $20 million in site improvements

EPA alleges a Wyoming fertilizer manufacturer failed to properly identify and manage certain waste streams as hazardous wastes and failed to report certain quantities of toxic chemicals in accordance with RCRA and EPCRA regulations respectively.

Under the settlement, the company agrees to implement specific waste management measures valued at nearly $20 million. These measures include extensive new efforts to recover and reuse the phosphate content within wastes and avoid their disposal in the gypstack.  The settlement also includes a detailed plan setting the terms for the future closure and long-term care of the gypstack
 

WHO: An egg processing facility
WHERE: David City, NE
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $827,500 plus approximately $2 million in site improvements

An egg processing facility reached an agreement with EPA to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. Federal environmental officials allege the facility discharged ammonia and other pollutants in excess of Federal and State limits into Keysor Creek via the David City wastewater treatment system, in multiple instances since 2014.

The egg processor has agreed to spend about $2 million in upgrades to reduce the amount of pollutants the facility sends to the local wastewater treatment system. The company will also help pay for upgrades to the wastewater treatment facility to adequately treat the facility’s wastewater, and will increase the frequency of its pollutant monitoring and reporting.
 

WHO: A non-profit ski and recreation area
WHERE: Boise, ID
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $52,680

A not-for-profit ski area about 16 miles northwest of Boise, Idaho has been cited for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act, including deficiencies in Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Site Map, failure to conduct required inspections, and improperly installed and maintained “Best Management Practices.”

EPA has issued an Expedited Settlement Agreement, in which the non-profit organization agreed to pay a five-figure settlement to resolve the alleged violations.

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: Clean Water Act, egg, egg farm, EPA Enforcement Roundup, Idaho, nebraska, non profit, not for profit, RCRA, ski area, wyoming

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I really enjoyed this training. Even after years on both sides of the comprehension coin, I find myself still learning! The quality of the delivery exceeded much of the training I have received in the past.

Neil Ozonur

Safety Officer

Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!

Oscar Fisher

EHS Manager

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.

Stephanie Gilliam

Material Production/Logistics Manager

Lion Technology workshops are amazing!! You always learn so much, and the instructors are fantastic.

Dorothy Rurak

Environmental Specialist

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Tips to identify and manage universal waste under more-stringent state regulations for generators and universal waste handlers in California.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.