Search

Protect Your Employees from Machine Injuries

Posted on 10/1/2013 by Joel Gregier

A Pennsylvania manufacturer faces a $61,600 fine for failing to have proper machine guarding on equipment, which led to a worker suffering a laceration injury. “Exposing workers to lacerations and possible amputation injuries by neglecting to ensure machine guarding is in place is unacceptable,” said OSHA Area Director Kim Nelson in Toledo. “Companies must be aware of the hazards that exist in their facilities and take all possible precautions to minimize the risk of injury.” (OSHA Press Release, 9/9/13)
 
OSHA 10 Hour general Industry training banner

 
In general, any machine that poses mechanical or physical hazards will require “guards” to provide a barrier of protection for the employees using the machine. Each guarding device should be designed to prevent the employee from having any part of his or her body in the danger zone of the machinery. Employers are responsible for identifying machine guarding hazard as required at 29 CFR 1910, Subpart O.
 
General Requirements
 
The employer must assess the workplace and identify machinery that could cause injury to any employee. [29 CFR 1910.212] One or more of the following could create a hazard to the machine operator and employees in the area of the machine:
 
  • Point of operation
  • Rotating parts
  • In-going nip points
  • Flying chips and sparks
Point of operation employee safety
Point of Operation
 
The point of operation is the area on the machine where the work is being performed on the material itself. Examples include cutting, shaping, boring, and forming operations.
 
See image on the right for an example of a point of operation.
 
 
 
Rotating machine parts employee safetyRotating Parts
 
Machinery with rotating motion can grip an employee’s clothing or by contact pull the employee into the machinery. Examples of rotating parts include collars, couplings, cams, clutches, flywheels, shafts, spindles, and meshing gears.
 
See image on the right for an example of a rotating part.
 
 
In-going Nip Points
 
Nip point hazard employee safetyThese hazards are caused by rotating parts on machinery and are categorized into three types:
  1. Parts rotating in opposite directions (e.g., intermeshing gears, rolling mills, and calendars)
  2. Between rotating parts and tangentially moving parts (e.g., chain and sprocket, rack and pinion)
  3. Between rotating parts and fixed parts (e.g., spoked handwheels, screw conveyors, and grinding wheels)
See image on the right for an example of a nip point.
 
 
Flying sparks employee safetyFlying Chips and Sparks
 
These operations have the potential to send particles toward the employee, resulting in burns, cuts, and other injuries. Examples include grinding, welding, sawing, and cutting operations.
 
See image on the right for an example of flying sparks.
 
 
Lion Technology offers convenient, easy-to-use OSHA online training available 24/7 to meet a number of training standards under 29 CFR, including the 10 Hour OSHA General Industry Online Course.
 

Tags: osha

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Having the tutorial buttons for additional information was extremely beneficial.

Sharon Ziemek

EHS Manager

I like the consistency of Lion workshops. The materials are well put together and instructors are top notch!

Kevin Pylka

Permitting, Compliance & Environmental Manager

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

Lion is my preferred trainer for hazmat and DOT.

Jim Jani

Environmental Coordinator

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!

Tony Petrik

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I really enjoy your workshops. Thank you for such a great program and all the help Lion has provided me over the years!

George Chatman

Hazardous Material Pharmacy Technician

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.